Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.51 · 22.0% (67 of 305 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.59 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.46 · 30.8% (94 of 305 decks)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Cyclone relevance 0.62 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (61 of 305 decks)
- Powder Keg relevance 0.64 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.49 · 15.4% (47 of 305 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (52 of 305 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (51 of 305 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (42 of 305 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.43 · 19.7% (60 of 305 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.51 · 9.5% (29 of 305 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (31 of 305 decks)
- Masticore relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.42 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.42 · 16.1% (49 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Hivemaster relevance 0.50 · 6.9% (21 of 305 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.51 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Elf relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.32 · 36.7% (112 of 305 decks)
- Ley Weaver relevance 0.46 · 8.5% (26 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (51 of 305 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (28 of 305 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.35 · 23.0% (70 of 305 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.39 · 12.8% (39 of 305 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (71 of 305 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.39 · 13.1% (40 of 305 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.35 · 18.0% (55 of 305 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Soultiller relevance 0.46 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (51 of 305 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.33 · 19.3% (59 of 305 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.28 · 35.4% (108 of 305 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.29 · 33.4% (102 of 305 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Scrapper relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (21 of 305 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Creeping Mold relevance 0.43 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
Card Stacks
27
Card Stacks
27Showing 1-2 of 27
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 64%
- Elvish Mystic 51%
- Fyndhorn Elves 47%
- Fyndhorn Elder 14%
- Wirewood Elf 11%
- Boreal Druid 9%
- Greenweaver Druid 7%
- Druid of the Cowl 6%
- Leaf Gilder 5%
- Nantuko Elder 4%
- Woodland Mystic 1%
- Golden Hind 1%
Other options: Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Rootrider Faun, Goobbue Gardener
Cards like Priest of Titania
4.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 29%
- Mana Reflection 23%
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 39%
- Skyshroud Claim 38%
- Three Visits 25%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 15%
- Ranger's Path 6%
- Hunting Wilds 4%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
7.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
8.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 45%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Kodama's Reach 36%
- Explosive Vegetation 16%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Migration Path 5%
- Far Wanderings 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Deep Reconnaissance 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Terramorph 1%
- Peregrination 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Untamed Wilds, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Verdant Mastery, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, Map the Wastes, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Green Sun's Zenith
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Krosan Grip
5.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 28%
- Naturalize 17%
- Wilt 1%
Other options: Break Asunder, Oxidize, Stomp and Howl, Natural Reclamation, Relic Crush, Wear Away, Verdigris
Cards like Reclamation Sage
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Indrik Stomphowler, Viridian Shaman, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists
Cards like Caged Sun
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Patchwork Banner, Hall of Triumph
Cards like Vernal Bloom
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other green decks
Cards
- Vernal Bloom 31%
- Utopia Sprawl 14%
Cards like Wild Growth
2.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 23%
- Overgrowth 6%
- Fertile Ground 4%
Other options: Market Festival, Dawn's Reflection, Wolfwillow Haven, Verdant Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Glittering Frost, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Vitalize
6.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Garruk Wildspeaker
7.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards like Arbor Elf
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 35%
- Quirion Ranger 16%
- Scryb Ranger 7%
Cards like Zendikar Resurgent
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other green decks
Cards like Regrowth
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Unnatural Restoration, True Ancestry, Nature's Spiral, Elven Cache
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Galadhrim Brigade, Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Wood Elves
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards like Exploration
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Dawntreader Elk, Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Explore
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.59 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (42 of 305 decks)
- Masticore relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Hivemaster relevance 0.50 · 6.9% (21 of 305 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.51 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Elf relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.32 · 36.7% (112 of 305 decks)
- Ley Weaver relevance 0.46 · 8.5% (26 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (51 of 305 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (28 of 305 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.39 · 12.8% (39 of 305 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.39 · 13.1% (40 of 305 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.35 · 18.0% (55 of 305 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Soultiller relevance 0.46 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.28 · 35.4% (108 of 305 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Scrapper relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (21 of 305 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.29 · 29.2% (89 of 305 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 0.41 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Lyrist relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (27 of 305 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.27 · 31.1% (95 of 305 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (32 of 305 decks)
- Gempalm Strider relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.33 · 12.8% (39 of 305 decks)
- Tribal Forcemage relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.25 · 34.4% (105 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.28 · 21.6% (66 of 305 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.37 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.25 · 33.8% (103 of 305 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (28 of 305 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.31 · 12.8% (39 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.30 · 13.4% (41 of 305 decks)
- Nantuko Elder relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
Artifacts
49
Artifacts
49 Showing 1-10 of 49
All artifacts (49)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Powder Keg relevance 0.64 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (52 of 305 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.51 · 9.5% (29 of 305 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.42 · 16.1% (49 of 305 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.33 · 19.3% (59 of 305 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (26 of 305 decks)
- Staff of Nin relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.28 · 13.1% (40 of 305 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Kusari-Gama relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 21.0% (64 of 305 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.16 · 16.1% (49 of 305 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (10 of 305 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 16.4% (50 of 305 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 27.5% (84 of 305 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (25 of 305 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (10 of 305 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 50.5% (154 of 305 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.46 · 30.8% (94 of 305 decks)
- Cyclone relevance 0.62 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.35 · 23.0% (70 of 305 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (71 of 305 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.35 · 12.1% (37 of 305 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (28 of 305 decks)
- Primal Order relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.31 · 13.8% (42 of 305 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.30 · 14.8% (45 of 305 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.31 · 12.1% (37 of 305 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.26 · 21.0% (64 of 305 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (29 of 305 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.22 · 33.4% (102 of 305 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (37 of 305 decks)
- Overwhelming Instinct relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.27 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (42 of 305 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (69 of 305 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.22 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (25 of 305 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.20 · 18.0% (55 of 305 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (58 of 305 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Recycle relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Elephant Grass relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 14.4% (44 of 305 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (32 of 305 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.16 · 23.3% (71 of 305 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Epic Struggle relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.51 · 22.0% (67 of 305 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (61 of 305 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (31 of 305 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (51 of 305 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.32 · 17.4% (53 of 305 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.40 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.23 · 28.2% (86 of 305 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.25 · 14.1% (43 of 305 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.23 · 17.7% (54 of 305 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (69 of 305 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.19 · 18.7% (57 of 305 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (61 of 305 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (42 of 305 decks)
- Tribal Unity relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (42 of 305 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (25 of 305 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.15 · 17.7% (54 of 305 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (27 of 305 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Seedtime relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 23.0% (70 of 305 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.09 · 55.1% (168 of 305 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 38.4% (117 of 305 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.49 · 15.4% (47 of 305 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (51 of 305 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.43 · 19.7% (60 of 305 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.29 · 33.4% (102 of 305 decks)
- Creeping Mold relevance 0.43 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.31 · 16.1% (49 of 305 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.28 · 28.2% (86 of 305 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.31 · 17.0% (52 of 305 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.34 · 10.5% (32 of 305 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (41 of 305 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (26 of 305 decks)
- Restock relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (49 of 305 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.22 · 38.4% (117 of 305 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.34 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (32 of 305 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (17 of 305 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.20 · 33.8% (103 of 305 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (62 of 305 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.21 · 26.2% (80 of 305 decks)
- Deep Reconnaissance relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (13 of 305 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.18 · 31.8% (97 of 305 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Whirlwind relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 305 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.19 · 18.4% (56 of 305 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.23 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Wildest Dreams relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Tsunami relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (25 of 305 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
Planeswalkers
11
Planeswalkers
11 Showing 1-10 of 11
All planeswalkers (11)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.42 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.26 · 36.4% (111 of 305 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.25 · 13.1% (40 of 305 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (20 of 305 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (10 of 305 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
Battles
1
Battles
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
Utility Lands
46
Utility Lands
46 Showing 1-10 of 46
All utility lands (46)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.34 · 15.7% (48 of 305 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (25 of 305 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.34 · 11.1% (34 of 305 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (26 of 305 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (22 of 305 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (32 of 305 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.25 · 16.4% (50 of 305 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.26 · 11.8% (36 of 305 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (24 of 305 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (44 of 305 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (38 of 305 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 14.8% (45 of 305 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (23 of 305 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (19 of 305 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.19 · 11.5% (35 of 305 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 14.8% (45 of 305 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 13.1% (40 of 305 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (12 of 305 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.18 · 9.8% (30 of 305 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (10 of 305 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (62 of 305 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.15 · 19.3% (59 of 305 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (18 of 305 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (15 of 305 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 18.0% (55 of 305 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 15.1% (46 of 305 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.15 · 6.9% (21 of 305 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (10 of 305 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (9 of 305 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 8.9% (27 of 305 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
Lands
20
Lands
20 Showing 1-10 of 20
All lands (20)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.25 · 27.5% (84 of 305 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.27 · 15.4% (47 of 305 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.25 · 21.6% (66 of 305 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.18 · 33.4% (102 of 305 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.22 · 11.8% (36 of 305 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (33 of 305 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (34 of 305 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (32 of 305 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (25 of 305 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (26 of 305 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (16 of 305 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 4.6% (14 of 305 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (11 of 305 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (8 of 305 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 81.3% (248 of 305 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Fist of Krosa, from 305 real Commander decks.