Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Zilortha, Strength Incarnate relevance 2.72 · 3.3% (81 of 2,445 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 2.59 · 3.4% (63 of 1,839 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 2.56 · 8.2% (43 of 523 decks)
- Vhati il-Dal relevance 2.50 · 4.7% (10 of 214 decks)
- Captain Sisay relevance 1.99 · 1.1% (19 of 1,797 decks)
- Darigaaz, the Igniter relevance 1.77 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 1.63 · 6.6% (12 of 181 decks)
- Stonebrow, Krosan Hero relevance 1.57 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 1.46 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.46 · 4.2% (13 of 310 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.38 · 1.0% (75 of 7,235 decks)
- Multani, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.26 · 3.2% (11 of 346 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 1.00 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- The First Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.94 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.94 · 2.0% (8 of 396 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.90 · 1.2% (13 of 1,085 decks)
- Tymna the Weaver // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.90 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Reki, the History of Kamigawa relevance 0.87 · 1.7% (8 of 484 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 0.86 · 1.1% (2 of 185 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.84 · 2.1% (6 of 291 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.84 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Kolvori, God of Kinship // The Ringhart Crest relevance 0.81 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Katerina of Myra's Marvels // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.76 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.75 · 3.8% (3 of 78 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.75 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.72 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 0.70 · 1.2% (7 of 606 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.70 · 3.6% (2 of 55 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.68 · 6.1% (2 of 33 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (3 of 102 decks)
All parallel cards (8)
All most relevant (30)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 1.13 · 18.7% (207 of 1,108 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.10 · 29.6% (328 of 1,108 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.00 · 38.7% (429 of 1,108 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.96 · 14.1% (156 of 1,108 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.91 · 23.0% (255 of 1,108 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.90 · 18.6% (206 of 1,108 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.89 · 38.8% (430 of 1,108 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.86 · 18.9% (209 of 1,108 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.85 · 10.8% (120 of 1,108 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.85 · 40.9% (453 of 1,108 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.81 · 16.4% (182 of 1,108 decks)
- Thorn Elemental relevance 0.78 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (174 of 1,108 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.74 · 10.7% (119 of 1,108 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.74 · 24.1% (267 of 1,108 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.74 · 12.3% (136 of 1,108 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.72 · 15.5% (172 of 1,108 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.71 · 20.7% (229 of 1,108 decks)
- Hunted Troll relevance 0.69 · 9.7% (107 of 1,108 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.68 · 13.4% (149 of 1,108 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (224 of 1,108 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (110 of 1,108 decks)
- Treeshaker Chimera relevance 0.64 · 9.9% (110 of 1,108 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (192 of 1,108 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.63 · 8.6% (95 of 1,108 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.62 · 35.3% (391 of 1,108 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.61 · 11.8% (131 of 1,108 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (129 of 1,108 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (211 of 1,108 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.61 · 10.6% (118 of 1,108 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 1.13 · 18.7% (207 of 1,108 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.10 · 29.6% (328 of 1,108 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.96 · 14.1% (156 of 1,108 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.91 · 23.0% (255 of 1,108 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.90 · 18.6% (206 of 1,108 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.89 · 38.8% (430 of 1,108 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.86 · 18.9% (209 of 1,108 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.85 · 10.8% (120 of 1,108 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.81 · 16.4% (182 of 1,108 decks)
- Thorn Elemental relevance 0.78 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (174 of 1,108 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.74 · 10.7% (119 of 1,108 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.74 · 12.3% (136 of 1,108 decks)
- Hunted Troll relevance 0.69 · 9.7% (107 of 1,108 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.68 · 13.4% (149 of 1,108 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (110 of 1,108 decks)
- Treeshaker Chimera relevance 0.64 · 9.9% (110 of 1,108 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.63 · 8.6% (95 of 1,108 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (129 of 1,108 decks)
- Hydra Omnivore relevance 0.61 · 10.6% (118 of 1,108 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.60 · 9.7% (107 of 1,108 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.60 · 23.2% (257 of 1,108 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (99 of 1,108 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (134 of 1,108 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.56 · 8.6% (95 of 1,108 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.56 · 10.6% (118 of 1,108 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 15.4% (171 of 1,108 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 17.4% (193 of 1,108 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (136 of 1,108 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.00 · 38.7% (429 of 1,108 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (192 of 1,108 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (211 of 1,108 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.58 · 12.4% (137 of 1,108 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (162 of 1,108 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (166 of 1,108 decks)
All instants (4)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.74 · 24.1% (267 of 1,108 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.61 · 11.8% (131 of 1,108 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (145 of 1,108 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (144 of 1,108 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.85 · 40.9% (453 of 1,108 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.72 · 15.5% (172 of 1,108 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.71 · 20.7% (229 of 1,108 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (224 of 1,108 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.62 · 35.3% (391 of 1,108 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.58 · 16.7% (185 of 1,108 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.56 · 24.1% (267 of 1,108 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.54 · 11.9% (132 of 1,108 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.86 · 27.3% (302 of 1,108 decks)
EDH data for Silvos, Rogue Elemental: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,108 real decks.