Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.64 · 60.4% (174 of 288 decks)
- Scattershot Archer relevance 0.78 · 32.6% (94 of 288 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.65 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.53 · 39.9% (115 of 288 decks)
- Endbringer relevance 0.60 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Oak Street Innkeeper relevance 0.60 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Hercules, Prince of Power relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Pathway Arrows relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Powerful Broker relevance 0.56 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.42 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Spawnwrithe relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.42 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.42 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Zimone's Experiment relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.35 · 26.4% (76 of 288 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.37 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.33 · 26.7% (77 of 288 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.37 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Matsu-Tribe Sniper relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.35 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 53.1% (153 of 288 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.29 · 31.6% (91 of 288 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Patron of the Orochi relevance 0.40 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.32 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Old-Growth Troll relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
Card Stacks
14
Card Stacks
14Showing 1-2 of 14
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
8.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
- Ohran Frostfang 44%
- Oakhame Adversary 17%
- Ohran Viper 3%
Cards like Wild Growth
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 26%
- Overgrowth 13%
- Fertile Ground 9%
- Wolfwillow Haven 4%
- Shimmerwilds Growth 4%
- Dawn's Reflection 2%
- Market Festival 2%
- Blighted Burgeoning 2%
- Verdant Haven 1%
Other options: Glittering Frost
Cards like Viridian Longbow
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.51 in other green decks
Cards
- Snakeskin Veil 26%
- Tyvar's Stand 25%
- Overprotect 5%
- Blossoming Defense 2%
Other options: Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
8.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Giant Adephage
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Giant Adephage 29%
- Spawnwrithe 7%
Cards like Scattershot Archer
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Skyway Sniper, Trophy Hunter
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 30%
- Lightning Greaves 22%
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Thunderfoot Baloth
7.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Managorger Hydra
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other green decks
Cards like Bloated Contaminator
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Thundering Ceratok
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.64 · 60.4% (174 of 288 decks)
- Scattershot Archer relevance 0.78 · 32.6% (94 of 288 decks)
- Endbringer relevance 0.60 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Oak Street Innkeeper relevance 0.60 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Hercules, Prince of Power relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Powerful Broker relevance 0.56 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.42 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Spawnwrithe relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.42 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.35 · 26.4% (76 of 288 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.37 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.33 · 26.7% (77 of 288 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.37 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Matsu-Tribe Sniper relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.35 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 53.1% (153 of 288 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.29 · 31.6% (91 of 288 decks)
- Patron of the Orochi relevance 0.40 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.32 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Old-Growth Troll relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Doomskar Warrior relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.23 · 44.4% (128 of 288 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.29 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.33 · 12.2% (35 of 288 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.29 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Aberrant Manawurm relevance 0.44 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.33 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (48 of 288 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.27 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
Artifacts
40
Artifacts
40 Showing 1-10 of 40
Page size
All artifacts (40)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.65 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.53 · 39.9% (115 of 288 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Pathway Arrows relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.42 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.26 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.22 · 22.9% (66 of 288 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.24 · 8.0% (23 of 288 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 30.2% (87 of 288 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 27.8% (80 of 288 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 58.7% (169 of 288 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.34 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.30 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Family's Favor relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.30 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.21 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.20 · 21.2% (61 of 288 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.20 · 19.1% (55 of 288 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.17 · 25.3% (73 of 288 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.18 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.16 · 26.4% (76 of 288 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.19 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.18 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.12 · 44.1% (127 of 288 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.31 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Lumaret's Favor relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.25 · 23.3% (67 of 288 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.20 · 39.2% (113 of 288 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.23 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.26 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.24 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.22 · 19.1% (55 of 288 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.21 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.26 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.18 · 25.7% (74 of 288 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 20.1% (58 of 288 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.17 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Clear Shot relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.15 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.13 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.14 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Zimone's Experiment relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.34 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Chelonian Tackle relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.25 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Follow the Lumarets relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Revenge of the Hunted relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Alluring Scent relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 23.3% (67 of 288 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.17 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.19 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.17 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 28.5% (82 of 288 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.13 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
Planeswalkers
7
Planeswalkers
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All planeswalkers (7)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.30 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.22 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
Utility Lands
37
Utility Lands
37 Showing 1-10 of 37
Page size
All utility lands (37)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.27 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (72 of 288 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.18 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.15 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.15 · 20.1% (58 of 288 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (90 of 288 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
Lands
21
Lands
21 Showing 1-10 of 21
Page size
All lands (21)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.22 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (32 of 288 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 19.1% (55 of 288 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 91.0% (262 of 288 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Saryth, the Viper's Fang, from 288 real Commander decks.