Cards like Harrow
5.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
79% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
2.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 79%
- Roiling Regrowth 60%
- Entish Restoration 58%
- Cycle of Renewal 34%
- Scapeshift 29%
- Planar Engineering 20%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
4.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards
- Garruk's Uprising 79%
- Elemental Bond 47%
- Kavu Lair 3%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 48%
- Skyshroud Claim 38%
- Three Visits 35%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 26%
- Ranger's Path 14%
- Glimpse the Core 13%
- Hunting Wilds 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 64%
- Rampant Growth 60%
- Kodama's Reach 44%
- Explosive Vegetation 22%
- Migration Path 18%
- Far Wanderings 15%
- Shared Roots 12%
- Search for Tomorrow 12%
- Grow from the Ashes 11%
- Reach the Horizon 9%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 8%
- Map the Frontier 3%
- Primal Growth 3%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Terramorph 1%
- New Generation's Technique 1%
- Verdant Mastery 1%
Other options: Beneath the Sands, Deep Reconnaissance, They Went This Way, Peregrination, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Exploration
7.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Traverse the Outlands 22%
- Boundless Realms 9%
- Reshape the Earth 7%
- Harvest Season 4%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey, Turtle Tracks
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 26%
- World Shaper 14%
Cards like Scute Swarm
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 45%
- Springheart Nantuko 14%
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
3.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Parallel Lives
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Parallel Lives 18%
- Doubling Season 15%
- Primal Vigor 5%
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 26%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 6%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 6%
- Undergrowth Champion 5%
- Sazh's Chocobo 4%
- Scythecat Cub 3%
- Seedship Agrarian 2%
- Territorial Scythecat 2%
- Floral Evoker 1%
Other options: Vinelasher Kudzu, Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Heritage Reclamation
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
All top picks (50)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.56 · 56.6% (605 of 1,068 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.64 · 30.5% (326 of 1,068 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.45 · 60.5% (646 of 1,068 decks)
- Sustenance relevance 0.84 · 8.1% (86 of 1,068 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.45 · 56.1% (599 of 1,068 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 43.7% (467 of 1,068 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.46 · 49.3% (526 of 1,068 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.63 · 14.8% (158 of 1,068 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (67 of 1,068 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.32 · 78.7% (840 of 1,068 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.61 · 15.4% (165 of 1,068 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.57 · 21.1% (225 of 1,068 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.50 · 29.6% (316 of 1,068 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.46 · 36.2% (387 of 1,068 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.39 · 51.5% (550 of 1,068 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.65 · 9.5% (101 of 1,068 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (140 of 1,068 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.49 · 28.4% (303 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (127 of 1,068 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.46 · 34.4% (367 of 1,068 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.53 · 19.9% (212 of 1,068 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (146 of 1,068 decks)
- Viewpoint Synchronization relevance 0.63 · 8.4% (90 of 1,068 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.51 · 20.9% (223 of 1,068 decks)
- Six relevance 0.43 · 35.9% (383 of 1,068 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.59 · 10.7% (114 of 1,068 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.56 · 12.7% (136 of 1,068 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (190 of 1,068 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.50 · 19.9% (212 of 1,068 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (123 of 1,068 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (150 of 1,068 decks)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 0.61 · 7.9% (84 of 1,068 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.35 · 54.5% (582 of 1,068 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.48 · 22.3% (238 of 1,068 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (103 of 1,068 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 32.0% (342 of 1,068 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (122 of 1,068 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.47 · 23.8% (254 of 1,068 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (137 of 1,068 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (177 of 1,068 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.32 · 58.1% (620 of 1,068 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.47 · 20.4% (218 of 1,068 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.32 · 56.5% (603 of 1,068 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.43 · 29.1% (311 of 1,068 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.47 · 19.9% (213 of 1,068 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.43 · 28.2% (301 of 1,068 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.37 · 43.2% (461 of 1,068 decks)
- Fortitude relevance 0.61 · 5.8% (62 of 1,068 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (139 of 1,068 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 57.7% (616 of 1,068 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.56 · 56.6% (605 of 1,068 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.64 · 30.5% (326 of 1,068 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.45 · 56.1% (599 of 1,068 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (67 of 1,068 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.57 · 21.1% (225 of 1,068 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.50 · 29.6% (316 of 1,068 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.39 · 51.5% (550 of 1,068 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.65 · 9.5% (101 of 1,068 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.49 · 28.4% (303 of 1,068 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.51 · 20.9% (223 of 1,068 decks)
- Six relevance 0.43 · 35.9% (383 of 1,068 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.59 · 10.7% (114 of 1,068 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.50 · 19.9% (212 of 1,068 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (150 of 1,068 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.35 · 54.5% (582 of 1,068 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.32 · 58.1% (620 of 1,068 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.32 · 56.5% (603 of 1,068 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.37 · 43.2% (461 of 1,068 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.52 · 11.1% (119 of 1,068 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.42 · 26.3% (281 of 1,068 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.43 · 23.2% (248 of 1,068 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (145 of 1,068 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.33 · 47.8% (510 of 1,068 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (88 of 1,068 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.40 · 26.4% (282 of 1,068 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.39 · 29.3% (313 of 1,068 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.43 · 19.1% (204 of 1,068 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.32 · 45.0% (481 of 1,068 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.38 · 28.1% (300 of 1,068 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.41 · 19.9% (213 of 1,068 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.44 · 14.0% (150 of 1,068 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.36 · 30.7% (328 of 1,068 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.48 · 9.4% (100 of 1,068 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (249 of 1,068 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.38 · 24.4% (261 of 1,068 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.32 · 40.5% (433 of 1,068 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (174 of 1,068 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.41 · 17.0% (182 of 1,068 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.40 · 18.1% (193 of 1,068 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (108 of 1,068 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.35 · 32.2% (344 of 1,068 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.51 · 5.8% (62 of 1,068 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (59 of 1,068 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (156 of 1,068 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.43 · 12.0% (128 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.41 · 13.5% (144 of 1,068 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.30 · 39.1% (418 of 1,068 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.34 · 27.2% (290 of 1,068 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.42 · 11.2% (120 of 1,068 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (183 of 1,068 decks)
All artifacts (28)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.46 · 49.3% (526 of 1,068 decks)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 0.61 · 7.9% (84 of 1,068 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (137 of 1,068 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.43 · 28.2% (301 of 1,068 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (129 of 1,068 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (94 of 1,068 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.44 · 19.1% (204 of 1,068 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.40 · 28.7% (306 of 1,068 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.53 · 7.4% (79 of 1,068 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.39 · 13.6% (145 of 1,068 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (70 of 1,068 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (76 of 1,068 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (53 of 1,068 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (48 of 1,068 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.35 · 5.0% (53 of 1,068 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (56 of 1,068 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (64 of 1,068 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (42 of 1,068 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (36 of 1,068 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (129 of 1,068 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (356 of 1,068 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (30 of 1,068 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (134 of 1,068 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 14.6% (156 of 1,068 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (95 of 1,068 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (32 of 1,068 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (34 of 1,068 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 48.4% (517 of 1,068 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Sustenance relevance 0.84 · 8.1% (86 of 1,068 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (140 of 1,068 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.53 · 19.9% (212 of 1,068 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (190 of 1,068 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (103 of 1,068 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 32.0% (342 of 1,068 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.47 · 23.8% (254 of 1,068 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (177 of 1,068 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.47 · 19.9% (213 of 1,068 decks)
- Fortitude relevance 0.61 · 5.8% (62 of 1,068 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.34 · 46.8% (500 of 1,068 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.56 · 5.8% (62 of 1,068 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (90 of 1,068 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (79 of 1,068 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.49 · 6.9% (74 of 1,068 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.30 · 41.9% (447 of 1,068 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.33 · 33.1% (353 of 1,068 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (188 of 1,068 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.38 · 15.3% (163 of 1,068 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (192 of 1,068 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (69 of 1,068 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.49 · 4.1% (44 of 1,068 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.27 · 33.6% (359 of 1,068 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (88 of 1,068 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.17 · 79.4% (848 of 1,068 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (87 of 1,068 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.30 · 19.3% (206 of 1,068 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (72 of 1,068 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.31 · 13.9% (148 of 1,068 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.37 · 5.9% (63 of 1,068 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (78 of 1,068 decks)
- Kavu Lair relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (30 of 1,068 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (85 of 1,068 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (46 of 1,068 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.49 · 2.7% (29 of 1,068 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.49 · 2.7% (29 of 1,068 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.27 · 14.5% (155 of 1,068 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.25 · 19.9% (213 of 1,068 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (50 of 1,068 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (28 of 1,068 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (33 of 1,068 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (26 of 1,068 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.26 · 6.6% (71 of 1,068 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (74 of 1,068 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.23 · 12.4% (132 of 1,068 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (181 of 1,068 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (58 of 1,068 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (41 of 1,068 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (62 of 1,068 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (49 of 1,068 decks)
All instants (42)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.45 · 60.5% (646 of 1,068 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.32 · 78.7% (840 of 1,068 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.46 · 34.4% (367 of 1,068 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.48 · 22.3% (238 of 1,068 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 57.7% (616 of 1,068 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (117 of 1,068 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 16.1% (172 of 1,068 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.49 · 5.4% (58 of 1,068 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (66 of 1,068 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.38 · 11.8% (126 of 1,068 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.40 · 5.7% (61 of 1,068 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.35 · 10.6% (113 of 1,068 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.26 · 31.8% (340 of 1,068 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (115 of 1,068 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (40 of 1,068 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.25 · 29.0% (310 of 1,068 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.29 · 13.7% (146 of 1,068 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (67 of 1,068 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.27 · 15.5% (166 of 1,068 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (166 of 1,068 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (103 of 1,068 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.21 · 24.4% (261 of 1,068 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (142 of 1,068 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (48 of 1,068 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (42 of 1,068 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.17 · 32.2% (344 of 1,068 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (115 of 1,068 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (51 of 1,068 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (65 of 1,068 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (63 of 1,068 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (128 of 1,068 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (46 of 1,068 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (59 of 1,068 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (31 of 1,068 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (38 of 1,068 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 53.7% (574 of 1,068 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 37.9% (405 of 1,068 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (40 of 1,068 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (34 of 1,068 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (60 of 1,068 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (53 of 1,068 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (26 of 1,068 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 43.7% (467 of 1,068 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.63 · 14.8% (158 of 1,068 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.61 · 15.4% (165 of 1,068 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.46 · 36.2% (387 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (127 of 1,068 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (146 of 1,068 decks)
- Viewpoint Synchronization relevance 0.63 · 8.4% (90 of 1,068 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.56 · 12.7% (136 of 1,068 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (123 of 1,068 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.47 · 20.4% (218 of 1,068 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.43 · 29.1% (311 of 1,068 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (139 of 1,068 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.51 · 12.9% (138 of 1,068 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (195 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.42 · 25.7% (275 of 1,068 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.44 · 21.7% (232 of 1,068 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.53 · 9.0% (96 of 1,068 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.49 · 11.6% (124 of 1,068 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (113 of 1,068 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (149 of 1,068 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (83 of 1,068 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.41 · 19.9% (212 of 1,068 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (110 of 1,068 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.50 · 7.0% (75 of 1,068 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.47 · 8.8% (94 of 1,068 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (120 of 1,068 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (74 of 1,068 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.34 · 21.5% (230 of 1,068 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.28 · 38.0% (406 of 1,068 decks)
- Become the Avalanche relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (52 of 1,068 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.43 · 6.0% (64 of 1,068 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.26 · 40.1% (428 of 1,068 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (111 of 1,068 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.41 · 5.6% (60 of 1,068 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (103 of 1,068 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (127 of 1,068 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (48 of 1,068 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.26 · 31.4% (335 of 1,068 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.31 · 14.1% (151 of 1,068 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.34 · 9.9% (106 of 1,068 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.30 · 12.1% (129 of 1,068 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (47 of 1,068 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.17 · 60.3% (644 of 1,068 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (35 of 1,068 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.23 · 30.2% (323 of 1,068 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.48 · 2.7% (29 of 1,068 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (37 of 1,068 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (216 of 1,068 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (132 of 1,068 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.42 · 3.4% (36 of 1,068 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (125 of 1,068 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (150 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (155 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.49 · 7.0% (75 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (81 of 1,068 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.32 · 33.0% (352 of 1,068 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (32 of 1,068 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (42 of 1,068 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (28 of 1,068 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (122 of 1,068 decks)
All utility lands (35)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.48 · 30.5% (326 of 1,068 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (114 of 1,068 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.35 · 23.9% (255 of 1,068 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.26 · 37.5% (400 of 1,068 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (68 of 1,068 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (42 of 1,068 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (79 of 1,068 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (60 of 1,068 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.22 · 28.3% (302 of 1,068 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (56 of 1,068 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.26 · 12.9% (138 of 1,068 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (81 of 1,068 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (130 of 1,068 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (57 of 1,068 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.30 · 4.8% (51 of 1,068 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (144 of 1,068 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (30 of 1,068 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.35 · 2.8% (30 of 1,068 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (36 of 1,068 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (30 of 1,068 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 16.4% (175 of 1,068 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (100 of 1,068 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (31 of 1,068 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (33 of 1,068 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 15.6% (167 of 1,068 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.18 · 13.0% (139 of 1,068 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.17 · 13.1% (140 of 1,068 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (37 of 1,068 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (52 of 1,068 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (46 of 1,068 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (32 of 1,068 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (29 of 1,068 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (31 of 1,068 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (27 of 1,068 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 7.3% (78 of 1,068 decks)
All lands (25)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.42 · 21.8% (233 of 1,068 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.30 · 26.5% (283 of 1,068 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (126 of 1,068 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.28 · 28.3% (302 of 1,068 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.35 · 11.1% (119 of 1,068 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (110 of 1,068 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.28 · 23.9% (255 of 1,068 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (83 of 1,068 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (85 of 1,068 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (31 of 1,068 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (101 of 1,068 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (104 of 1,068 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (91 of 1,068 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (95 of 1,068 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (101 of 1,068 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (81 of 1,068 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (35 of 1,068 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (79 of 1,068 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (36 of 1,068 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (27 of 1,068 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.19 · 13.0% (139 of 1,068 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (29 of 1,068 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (30 of 1,068 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (26 of 1,068 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.0% (993 of 1,068 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Titania, Nature's Force, from 1,068 real Commander decks.