Hour of Promise
Played in 539 Temur decks
1730+11+4+5+2+8+10+10+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Maelstrom Wanderer 1.9% of decks
Maelstrom Wanderer 1.9% of decks
Omnath, Locus of the Roil 2.2% of decks
Omnath, Locus of the Roil 2.2% of decks
Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree 3.3% of decks
Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree 3.3% of decks
The Sixth Doctor // Amy Pond 100.0% of decks
The Sixth Doctor // Amy Pond 100.0% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 1.6% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 1.6% of decks
Borborygmos and Fblthp 1.2% of decks
Borborygmos and Fblthp 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Tempt with Discovery 31.4% of decks
Tempt with Discovery 31.4% of decks
Pir's Whim 19.7% of decks
Pir's Whim 19.7% of decks
Scapeshift 24.3% of decks
Scapeshift 24.3% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 31.4% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 31.4% of decks
Copy Land 16.7% of decks
Copy Land 16.7% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 35.3% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 35.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (17)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.68 · 1.9% (82 of 4,291 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.57 · 2.2% (46 of 2,050 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.04 · 3.3% (8 of 240 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Amy Pond relevance 0.76 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.74 · 1.6% (7 of 433 decks)
- Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 0.73 · 1.2% (10 of 852 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.70 · 2.7% (4 of 150 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.55 · 3.8% (2 of 53 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken // The Fugitive Doctor relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Yasmin Khan relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.37 · 1.5% (2 of 137 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (2 of 181 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.26 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.18 · 31.4% (169 of 539 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.15 · 19.7% (106 of 539 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (131 of 539 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.10 · 31.4% (169 of 539 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.06 · 16.7% (90 of 539 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 35.3% (190 of 539 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.95 · 31.9% (172 of 539 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.92 · 27.5% (148 of 539 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.89 · 24.9% (134 of 539 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.87 · 39.5% (213 of 539 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.81 · 15.4% (83 of 539 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.81 · 23.6% (127 of 539 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.80 · 24.3% (131 of 539 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.78 · 13.9% (75 of 539 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (65 of 539 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.77 · 29.5% (159 of 539 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.74 · 29.7% (160 of 539 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.73 · 21.2% (114 of 539 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.73 · 19.1% (103 of 539 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.73 · 16.9% (91 of 539 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (111 of 539 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.71 · 22.3% (120 of 539 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.70 · 13.4% (72 of 539 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.69 · 14.8% (80 of 539 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (70 of 539 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 18.2% (98 of 539 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.66 · 24.1% (130 of 539 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (135 of 539 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.64 · 25.8% (139 of 539 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (101 of 539 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 35.3% (190 of 539 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.95 · 31.9% (172 of 539 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.89 · 24.9% (134 of 539 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.81 · 23.6% (127 of 539 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.80 · 24.3% (131 of 539 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.77 · 29.5% (159 of 539 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.71 · 22.3% (120 of 539 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (70 of 539 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.66 · 24.1% (130 of 539 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (135 of 539 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (101 of 539 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.92 · 27.5% (148 of 539 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (111 of 539 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.70 · 13.4% (72 of 539 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 18.2% (98 of 539 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Copy Land relevance 1.06 · 16.7% (90 of 539 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.81 · 15.4% (83 of 539 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.74 · 29.7% (160 of 539 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.73 · 19.1% (103 of 539 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.69 · 14.8% (80 of 539 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.87 · 39.5% (213 of 539 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.73 · 21.2% (114 of 539 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.18 · 31.4% (169 of 539 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.15 · 19.7% (106 of 539 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (131 of 539 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.10 · 31.4% (169 of 539 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.78 · 13.9% (75 of 539 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (65 of 539 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.73 · 16.9% (91 of 539 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.64 · 25.8% (139 of 539 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.35 · 30.6% (165 of 539 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.33 · 31.4% (169 of 539 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 1.06 · 23.0% (124 of 539 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (142 of 539 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.81 · 14.7% (79 of 539 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.74 · 30.6% (165 of 539 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.70 · 12.2% (66 of 539 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.68 · 11.5% (62 of 539 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.68 · 26.2% (141 of 539 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.65 · 11.5% (62 of 539 decks)
All lands (10)
- Vesuva relevance 1.30 · 28.9% (156 of 539 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.91 · 23.2% (125 of 539 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.85 · 23.2% (125 of 539 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.75 · 17.6% (95 of 539 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.74 · 20.4% (110 of 539 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.71 · 35.8% (193 of 539 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.67 · 12.1% (65 of 539 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.65 · 11.5% (62 of 539 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.62 · 11.1% (60 of 539 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.62 · 11.7% (63 of 539 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 539 real decks.

























































