Cards like Enchantress's Presence
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
81% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
3.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
2.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 76%
- Fertile Ground 62%
- Overgrowth 29%
- Wolfwillow Haven 23%
- Shimmerwilds Growth 15%
- Buried in the Garden 8%
- Dawn's Reflection 4%
- Verdant Haven 3%
- Market Festival 3%
- Glittering Frost 1%
Other options: Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Setessan Champion
9.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Jukai Naturalist
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Seal of Cleansing
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sterling Grove
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Sterling Grove 77%
- Greater Auramancy 31%
Cards like Grasp of Fate
19× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Grasp of Fate 49%
- Banishing Light 19%
- Seal from Existence 7%
- Seam Rip 6%
- Stasis Snare 3%
- Borrowed Time 3%
- Trapped in the Screen 2%
- Seal Away 2%
- Stormplain Detainment 1%
Other options: Banishment, Prison Realm, Web Up, Citizen's Arrest, Super Villain Lockup, Temporary Lockdown, Mystical Tether, Silkwrap, Ixalan's Binding, Isolation Zone, Thopter Arrest, Memory Trap, Hieromancer's Cage
Cards like Kenrith's Transformation
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sanctum Weaver
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Ethereal Armor
9.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sheltered by Ghosts
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Faith Unbroken, Hardlight Containment, Chained to the Rocks
Cards like All That Glitters
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 25%
- Worldly Tutor 18%
- Sylvan Tutor 4%
Cards like Abundant Growth
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Winds of Rath
3.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Doomskar, Rout, End Hostilities, Sublime Exhalation
Cards like Exploration
17× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Rancor
7.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Cards like Ancestral Mask
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Flickering Ward
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Cho-Manno's Blessing, Pentarch Ward, Ward of Lights, Floating Shield, Prismatic Ward, Pledge of Loyalty
Cards like Heliod, Sun-Crowned
11× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Idyllic Tutor
13× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Smothering Tithe
3.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sigil of the Empty Throne
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
3.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Composer of Spring
5.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Grand Abolisher
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.53 · 85.1% (6,063 of 7,121 decks)
- Sigil of the Empty Throne relevance 0.65 · 64.5% (4,595 of 7,121 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.50 · 87.7% (6,242 of 7,121 decks)
- Whip Silk relevance 0.86 · 32.2% (2,291 of 7,121 decks)
- Seal of Cleansing relevance 0.78 · 42.2% (3,002 of 7,121 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.54 · 76.8% (5,472 of 7,121 decks)
- Flickering Ward relevance 0.79 · 39.9% (2,841 of 7,121 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.80 · 37.6% (2,678 of 7,121 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.52 · 78.5% (5,591 of 7,121 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.59 · 64.2% (4,569 of 7,121 decks)
- Jukai Naturalist relevance 0.53 · 74.3% (5,294 of 7,121 decks)
- Alseid of Life's Bounty relevance 0.70 · 47.0% (3,347 of 7,121 decks)
- Satyr Enchanter relevance 0.61 · 59.6% (4,241 of 7,121 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.66 · 51.6% (3,672 of 7,121 decks)
- Argothian Enchantress relevance 0.72 · 42.6% (3,035 of 7,121 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 0.79 · 33.4% (2,381 of 7,121 decks)
- Hallowed Haunting relevance 0.71 · 42.4% (3,017 of 7,121 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.66 · 50.2% (3,578 of 7,121 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.58 · 62.1% (4,421 of 7,121 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.52 · 70.8% (5,044 of 7,121 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.62 · 54.5% (3,883 of 7,121 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.68 · 43.4% (3,088 of 7,121 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.53 · 68.8% (4,901 of 7,121 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.75 · 33.5% (2,385 of 7,121 decks)
- Archon of Sun's Grace relevance 0.61 · 53.4% (3,802 of 7,121 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.73 · 34.9% (2,488 of 7,121 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.54 · 63.2% (4,501 of 7,121 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.54 · 62.7% (4,467 of 7,121 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.65 · 43.6% (3,107 of 7,121 decks)
- Karmic Justice relevance 0.81 · 22.4% (1,598 of 7,121 decks)
- Greater Auramancy relevance 0.73 · 30.6% (2,178 of 7,121 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 43.5% (3,099 of 7,121 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.60 · 48.5% (3,455 of 7,121 decks)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 0.55 · 56.1% (3,993 of 7,121 decks)
- Resurgent Belief relevance 0.80 · 19.0% (1,350 of 7,121 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.71 · 29.4% (2,092 of 7,121 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.56 · 53.0% (3,775 of 7,121 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.58 · 49.9% (3,555 of 7,121 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.75 · 23.2% (1,653 of 7,121 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.75 · 22.6% (1,611 of 7,121 decks)
- Replenish relevance 0.78 · 18.1% (1,291 of 7,121 decks)
- Celestial Ancient relevance 0.89 · 10.3% (731 of 7,121 decks)
- Moon-Blessed Cleric relevance 0.69 · 29.5% (2,102 of 7,121 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 0.62 · 38.6% (2,746 of 7,121 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (1,069 of 7,121 decks)
- Trickster's Elk relevance 0.79 · 15.2% (1,079 of 7,121 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.43 · 74.0% (5,271 of 7,121 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.59 · 43.8% (3,118 of 7,121 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.75 · 20.1% (1,433 of 7,121 decks)
- Weaver of Harmony relevance 0.65 · 31.8% (2,265 of 7,121 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.50 · 87.7% (6,242 of 7,121 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.52 · 78.5% (5,591 of 7,121 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.59 · 64.2% (4,569 of 7,121 decks)
- Jukai Naturalist relevance 0.53 · 74.3% (5,294 of 7,121 decks)
- Alseid of Life's Bounty relevance 0.70 · 47.0% (3,347 of 7,121 decks)
- Satyr Enchanter relevance 0.61 · 59.6% (4,241 of 7,121 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.66 · 51.6% (3,672 of 7,121 decks)
- Argothian Enchantress relevance 0.72 · 42.6% (3,035 of 7,121 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.66 · 50.2% (3,578 of 7,121 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.52 · 70.8% (5,044 of 7,121 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.68 · 43.4% (3,088 of 7,121 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.53 · 68.8% (4,901 of 7,121 decks)
- Archon of Sun's Grace relevance 0.61 · 53.4% (3,802 of 7,121 decks)
- Celestial Ancient relevance 0.89 · 10.3% (731 of 7,121 decks)
- Moon-Blessed Cleric relevance 0.69 · 29.5% (2,102 of 7,121 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 0.62 · 38.6% (2,746 of 7,121 decks)
- Trickster's Elk relevance 0.79 · 15.2% (1,079 of 7,121 decks)
- Weaver of Harmony relevance 0.65 · 31.8% (2,265 of 7,121 decks)
- Composer of Spring relevance 0.70 · 23.1% (1,646 of 7,121 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.70 · 23.1% (1,644 of 7,121 decks)
- Aegis of the Gods relevance 0.83 · 10.9% (774 of 7,121 decks)
- Ajani's Chosen relevance 0.70 · 22.1% (1,573 of 7,121 decks)
- Kami of Transience relevance 0.83 · 11.1% (793 of 7,121 decks)
- Calix, Guided by Fate relevance 0.62 · 33.2% (2,361 of 7,121 decks)
- Nyxborn Behemoth relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (864 of 7,121 decks)
- Katilda, Dawnhart Martyr // Katilda's Rising Dawn relevance 0.81 · 9.8% (698 of 7,121 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 0.79 · 11.1% (790 of 7,121 decks)
- Heliod, Sun-Crowned relevance 0.53 · 40.5% (2,882 of 7,121 decks)
- Yenna, Redtooth Regent relevance 0.64 · 20.9% (1,489 of 7,121 decks)
- Starnheim Courser relevance 0.78 · 9.0% (644 of 7,121 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (794 of 7,121 decks)
- Spirited Companion relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (1,191 of 7,121 decks)
- Yavimaya Enchantress relevance 0.84 · 4.9% (346 of 7,121 decks)
- Nylea's Colossus relevance 0.74 · 9.2% (655 of 7,121 decks)
- Generous Visitor relevance 0.79 · 6.5% (462 of 7,121 decks)
- Ghostly Dancers relevance 0.78 · 6.9% (488 of 7,121 decks)
- Siona, Captain of the Pyleas relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (907 of 7,121 decks)
- Ondu Spiritdancer relevance 0.64 · 14.6% (1,038 of 7,121 decks)
- Transcendent Envoy relevance 0.67 · 11.4% (810 of 7,121 decks)
- Kor Spiritdancer relevance 0.62 · 14.4% (1,025 of 7,121 decks)
- Seedcradle Witch relevance 0.68 · 9.7% (691 of 7,121 decks)
- Pearl-Ear, Imperial Advisor relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (853 of 7,121 decks)
- Light-Paws, Emperor's Voice relevance 0.68 · 9.1% (647 of 7,121 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.65 · 11.0% (780 of 7,121 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (717 of 7,121 decks)
- Heliod, God of the Sun relevance 0.71 · 6.8% (483 of 7,121 decks)
- Ellivere of the Wild Court relevance 0.66 · 10.0% (709 of 7,121 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 0.83 · 4.3% (304 of 7,121 decks)
- Michiko's Reign of Truth // Portrait of Michiko relevance 0.67 · 8.6% (611 of 7,121 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.72 · 5.1% (362 of 7,121 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All artifacts (16)
- Helm of the Gods relevance 0.78 · 11.2% (795 of 7,121 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.78 · 5.4% (386 of 7,121 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (1,264 of 7,121 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.61 · 7.2% (510 of 7,121 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.59 · 8.1% (578 of 7,121 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.61 · 5.3% (374 of 7,121 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.64 · 4.6% (329 of 7,121 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.63 · 4.3% (308 of 7,121 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.43 · 13.9% (988 of 7,121 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (195 of 7,121 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (359 of 7,121 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (495 of 7,121 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.30 · 4.8% (340 of 7,121 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (612 of 7,121 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (2,297 of 7,121 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 57.4% (4,084 of 7,121 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.53 · 85.1% (6,063 of 7,121 decks)
- Sigil of the Empty Throne relevance 0.65 · 64.5% (4,595 of 7,121 decks)
- Whip Silk relevance 0.86 · 32.2% (2,291 of 7,121 decks)
- Seal of Cleansing relevance 0.78 · 42.2% (3,002 of 7,121 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.54 · 76.8% (5,472 of 7,121 decks)
- Flickering Ward relevance 0.79 · 39.9% (2,841 of 7,121 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.80 · 37.6% (2,678 of 7,121 decks)
- Solitary Confinement relevance 0.79 · 33.4% (2,381 of 7,121 decks)
- Hallowed Haunting relevance 0.71 · 42.4% (3,017 of 7,121 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.58 · 62.1% (4,421 of 7,121 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.62 · 54.5% (3,883 of 7,121 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.75 · 33.5% (2,385 of 7,121 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.73 · 34.9% (2,488 of 7,121 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.54 · 63.2% (4,501 of 7,121 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.54 · 62.7% (4,467 of 7,121 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.65 · 43.6% (3,107 of 7,121 decks)
- Karmic Justice relevance 0.81 · 22.4% (1,598 of 7,121 decks)
- Greater Auramancy relevance 0.73 · 30.6% (2,178 of 7,121 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 43.5% (3,099 of 7,121 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.60 · 48.5% (3,455 of 7,121 decks)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 0.55 · 56.1% (3,993 of 7,121 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.71 · 29.4% (2,092 of 7,121 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.56 · 53.0% (3,775 of 7,121 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.58 · 49.9% (3,555 of 7,121 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.75 · 23.2% (1,653 of 7,121 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.75 · 22.6% (1,611 of 7,121 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (1,069 of 7,121 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.43 · 74.0% (5,271 of 7,121 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.75 · 20.1% (1,433 of 7,121 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.52 · 54.6% (3,889 of 7,121 decks)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.70 · 24.2% (1,720 of 7,121 decks)
- Ossification relevance 0.75 · 17.4% (1,242 of 7,121 decks)
- Gauntlets of Light relevance 0.81 · 12.7% (905 of 7,121 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.78 · 14.2% (1,009 of 7,121 decks)
- Soul Snare relevance 0.85 · 10.4% (739 of 7,121 decks)
- Meticulous Excavation relevance 0.86 · 9.8% (701 of 7,121 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.68 · 26.6% (1,896 of 7,121 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.41 · 75.8% (5,395 of 7,121 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (1,659 of 7,121 decks)
- Starfield of Nyx relevance 0.72 · 17.0% (1,213 of 7,121 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.65 · 26.3% (1,875 of 7,121 decks)
- Tempest Technique relevance 0.78 · 12.0% (858 of 7,121 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.73 · 14.8% (1,051 of 7,121 decks)
- Static Prison relevance 0.86 · 7.6% (544 of 7,121 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.69 · 18.7% (1,333 of 7,121 decks)
- Mana Bloom relevance 0.91 · 5.0% (353 of 7,121 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.80 · 10.5% (745 of 7,121 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.58 · 36.1% (2,572 of 7,121 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.61 · 30.7% (2,183 of 7,121 decks)
- Shielded by Faith relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (1,059 of 7,121 decks)
All instants (31)
- Karametra's Blessing relevance 0.79 · 6.6% (470 of 7,121 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.43 · 41.0% (2,918 of 7,121 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (1,050 of 7,121 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (1,010 of 7,121 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.56 · 11.2% (795 of 7,121 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.63 · 5.2% (369 of 7,121 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.64 · 4.8% (344 of 7,121 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.55 · 7.3% (518 of 7,121 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (1,271 of 7,121 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (680 of 7,121 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.38 · 25.2% (1,794 of 7,121 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.61 · 4.1% (290 of 7,121 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.37 · 20.4% (1,450 of 7,121 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (411 of 7,121 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (494 of 7,121 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (583 of 7,121 decks)
- Rite of Harmony relevance 0.48 · 4.5% (322 of 7,121 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (414 of 7,121 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (450 of 7,121 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.41 · 5.2% (369 of 7,121 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.58 · 2.8% (202 of 7,121 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.54 · 2.8% (196 of 7,121 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (368 of 7,121 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.22 · 37.0% (2,636 of 7,121 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.50 · 2.7% (192 of 7,121 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.26 · 18.9% (1,343 of 7,121 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (415 of 7,121 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 22.0% (1,569 of 7,121 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (183 of 7,121 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.14 · 46.7% (3,322 of 7,121 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.11 · 64.4% (4,589 of 7,121 decks)
All sorceries (27)
- Resurgent Belief relevance 0.80 · 19.0% (1,350 of 7,121 decks)
- Replenish relevance 0.78 · 18.1% (1,291 of 7,121 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.59 · 43.8% (3,118 of 7,121 decks)
- Brilliant Restoration relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (958 of 7,121 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.59 · 27.6% (1,967 of 7,121 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 0.82 · 6.2% (441 of 7,121 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.68 · 12.6% (898 of 7,121 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.62 · 15.7% (1,115 of 7,121 decks)
- Retether relevance 0.63 · 6.8% (487 of 7,121 decks)
- Plea for Guidance relevance 0.80 · 3.8% (268 of 7,121 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (581 of 7,121 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.50 · 10.1% (718 of 7,121 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.68 · 3.7% (267 of 7,121 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.43 · 12.6% (898 of 7,121 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.62 · 3.8% (271 of 7,121 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.51 · 5.0% (358 of 7,121 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.37 · 22.4% (1,595 of 7,121 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.53 · 4.5% (317 of 7,121 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.52 · 3.9% (280 of 7,121 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.38 · 10.6% (754 of 7,121 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.44 · 3.8% (273 of 7,121 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (547 of 7,121 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.27 · 6.7% (474 of 7,121 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (661 of 7,121 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (448 of 7,121 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (657 of 7,121 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.18 · 12.9% (921 of 7,121 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Calix, Destiny's Hand relevance 0.73 · 17.8% (1,266 of 7,121 decks)
All utility lands (28)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.52 · 59.2% (4,216 of 7,121 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.45 · 42.7% (3,038 of 7,121 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.75 · 4.7% (334 of 7,121 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.32 · 55.8% (3,971 of 7,121 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.60 · 6.4% (453 of 7,121 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.56 · 6.9% (492 of 7,121 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.46 · 14.3% (1,020 of 7,121 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.55 · 6.2% (441 of 7,121 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.39 · 26.7% (1,899 of 7,121 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.36 · 26.9% (1,913 of 7,121 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (1,980 of 7,121 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (563 of 7,121 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.53 · 4.1% (292 of 7,121 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.34 · 18.5% (1,315 of 7,121 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.33 · 15.3% (1,093 of 7,121 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (546 of 7,121 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.59 · 2.5% (179 of 7,121 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (446 of 7,121 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (831 of 7,121 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.52 · 3.2% (228 of 7,121 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.26 · 29.5% (2,104 of 7,121 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (178 of 7,121 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (288 of 7,121 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 12.4% (884 of 7,121 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (233 of 7,121 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (289 of 7,121 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (364 of 7,121 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (279 of 7,121 decks)
All lands (47)
- Serra's Sanctum relevance 0.73 · 26.5% (1,890 of 7,121 decks)
- Valgavoth's Lair relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (1,117 of 7,121 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.60 · 16.9% (1,207 of 7,121 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.63 · 8.7% (623 of 7,121 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (972 of 7,121 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.62 · 8.3% (590 of 7,121 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.53 · 14.5% (1,031 of 7,121 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (999 of 7,121 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.54 · 13.2% (937 of 7,121 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.52 · 14.3% (1,018 of 7,121 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.53 · 13.7% (974 of 7,121 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.59 · 7.5% (531 of 7,121 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (773 of 7,121 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.58 · 7.7% (545 of 7,121 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.55 · 7.8% (556 of 7,121 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (757 of 7,121 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.41 · 21.9% (1,563 of 7,121 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.51 · 6.5% (463 of 7,121 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.39 · 19.7% (1,401 of 7,121 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.53 · 4.6% (331 of 7,121 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.33 · 31.8% (2,266 of 7,121 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.26 · 46.3% (3,297 of 7,121 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (736 of 7,121 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.33 · 21.4% (1,523 of 7,121 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.56 · 3.3% (233 of 7,121 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.47 · 4.3% (304 of 7,121 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.45 · 4.6% (325 of 7,121 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.31 · 19.9% (1,416 of 7,121 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.27 · 31.7% (2,258 of 7,121 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.39 · 6.1% (434 of 7,121 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.22 · 50.4% (3,591 of 7,121 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (462 of 7,121 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (334 of 7,121 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (724 of 7,121 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.23 · 34.7% (2,470 of 7,121 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.20 · 44.4% (3,159 of 7,121 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 20.7% (1,471 of 7,121 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.17 · 60.9% (4,335 of 7,121 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.28 · 13.6% (970 of 7,121 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (235 of 7,121 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.19 · 42.0% (2,988 of 7,121 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.19 · 42.5% (3,023 of 7,121 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.12 · 59.5% (4,238 of 7,121 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.10 · 61.3% (4,365 of 7,121 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 85.3% (6,075 of 7,121 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.02 · 88.0% (6,269 of 7,121 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 88.9% (6,329 of 7,121 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sythis, Harvest's Hand, from 7,121 real Commander decks.