Color Identity Spread
13.2% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.26 · 65.1% (6,158 of 9,462 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.63 · 51.2% (2,506 of 4,894 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.23 · 36.4% (2,632 of 7,236 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.07 · 51.7% (465 of 900 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 1.98 · 34.5% (1,321 of 3,828 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.93 · 38.4% (756 of 1,967 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.86 · 40.5% (503 of 1,243 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.73 · 42.8% (272 of 635 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.70 · 24.5% (1,743 of 7,127 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.57 · 36.9% (246 of 667 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.53 · 32.4% (309 of 953 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.49 · 35.2% (209 of 593 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.44 · 28.2% (333 of 1,180 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.38 · 26.4% (324 of 1,225 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.36 · 27.9% (254 of 909 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.25 · 23.2% (281 of 1,210 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 1.19 · 25.8% (153 of 592 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 1.08 · 18.1% (285 of 1,574 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.99 · 16.1% (270 of 1,678 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (85 of 377 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.95 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.93 · 22.1% (73 of 330 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.84 · 12.2% (296 of 2,419 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.81 · 15.2% (119 of 782 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.79 · 10.5% (414 of 3,951 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (122 of 1,091 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.62 · 22.5% (16 of 71 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.54 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (196 of 3,155 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.46 · 12.9% (19 of 147 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.6% (12,160 of 23,575 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.17 · 52.2% (12,306 of 23,575 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 42.1% (9,925 of 23,575 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 42.6% (10,048 of 23,575 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.12 · 43.4% (10,226 of 23,575 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 40.6% (9,569 of 23,575 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.05 · 54.9% (12,933 of 23,575 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 43.6% (10,269 of 23,575 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 31.7% (7,478 of 23,575 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.86 · 41.1% (9,695 of 23,575 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.86 · 31.4% (7,394 of 23,575 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.86 · 62.3% (14,694 of 23,575 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.83 · 27.4% (6,458 of 23,575 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (8,303 of 23,575 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.82 · 40.3% (9,491 of 23,575 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.81 · 42.9% (10,107 of 23,575 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 23.2% (5,480 of 23,575 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 35.2% (8,296 of 23,575 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 24.6% (5,805 of 23,575 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (5,208 of 23,575 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 27.4% (6,452 of 23,575 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 24.4% (5,762 of 23,575 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.68 · 20.4% (4,803 of 23,575 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.64 · 33.2% (7,833 of 23,575 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (4,408 of 23,575 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (5,701 of 23,575 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.62 · 20.5% (4,826 of 23,575 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.62 · 35.4% (8,340 of 23,575 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (3,941 of 23,575 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.61 · 16.9% (3,978 of 23,575 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.6% (12,160 of 23,575 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 42.1% (9,925 of 23,575 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 42.6% (10,048 of 23,575 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.12 · 43.4% (10,226 of 23,575 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 40.6% (9,569 of 23,575 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.05 · 54.9% (12,933 of 23,575 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 43.6% (10,269 of 23,575 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 31.7% (7,478 of 23,575 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.86 · 41.1% (9,695 of 23,575 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.86 · 62.3% (14,694 of 23,575 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.83 · 27.4% (6,458 of 23,575 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.82 · 40.3% (9,491 of 23,575 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.81 · 42.9% (10,107 of 23,575 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 24.6% (5,805 of 23,575 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 24.4% (5,762 of 23,575 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.68 · 20.4% (4,803 of 23,575 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.64 · 33.2% (7,833 of 23,575 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (4,408 of 23,575 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.62 · 20.5% (4,826 of 23,575 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (3,941 of 23,575 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.61 · 16.9% (3,978 of 23,575 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.58 · 16.1% (3,787 of 23,575 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (3,519 of 23,575 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.55 · 29.8% (7,037 of 23,575 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.53 · 17.0% (4,008 of 23,575 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.51 · 19.5% (4,588 of 23,575 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (3,220 of 23,575 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 23.2% (5,480 of 23,575 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (5,208 of 23,575 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 1.17 · 52.2% (12,306 of 23,575 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.86 · 31.4% (7,394 of 23,575 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 27.4% (6,452 of 23,575 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.57 · 18.3% (4,325 of 23,575 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.51 · 14.4% (3,388 of 23,575 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (8,303 of 23,575 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 35.2% (8,296 of 23,575 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (5,701 of 23,575 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.50 · 31.3% (7,371 of 23,575 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Explore relevance 0.62 · 35.4% (8,340 of 23,575 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.60 · 15.7% (3,690 of 23,575 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.55 · 43.4% (10,224 of 23,575 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (3,178 of 23,575 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (4,609 of 23,575 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.60 · 34.6% (8,154 of 23,575 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.57 · 15.3% (3,616 of 23,575 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.51 · 27.5% (6,474 of 23,575 decks)
All lands (4)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 42.1% (9,932 of 23,575 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.67 · 41.6% (9,809 of 23,575 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.63 · 38.0% (8,954 of 23,575 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.56 · 44.7% (10,537 of 23,575 decks)
EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23,575 real decks.