Crucible of Worlds
Played in 5,078 Naya decks
1530+19+3+3+3+4+11+7+
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Naya
-
Jund 16,615 · 13.6%
-
Sultai 12,901 · 10.5%
-
Green 10,299 · 8.4%
-
Simic 7,078 · 5.8%
-
Abzan 6,541 · 5.3%
-
Golgari 6,507 · 5.3%
-
Gruul 6,211 · 5.1%
-
Grixis 6,067 · 5.0%
-
Naya 5,078 · 4.1%
-
Five-Color 4,981 · 4.1%
-
Temur 4,653 · 3.8%
-
Ink-Treader 3,887 · 3.2%
-
Black 3,860 · 3.2%
-
Boros 3,834 · 3.1%
-
Red 3,247 · 2.7%
- Other (17) 20,704 · 16.9%
Commanders
Yuma, Proud Protector 24.0% of decks
Yuma, Proud Protector 24.0% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 19.6% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 19.6% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 17.1% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 17.1% of decks
Toph, the First Metalbender 7.9% of decks
Toph, the First Metalbender 7.9% of decks
Kirri, Talented Sprout 13.0% of decks
Kirri, Talented Sprout 13.0% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 19.3% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 19.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 53.8% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 53.8% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 47.2% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 47.2% of decks
Ramunap Excavator 42.8% of decks
Ramunap Excavator 42.8% of decks
Exploration 47.8% of decks
Exploration 47.8% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 54.7% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 54.7% of decks
Lotus Cobra 56.6% of decks
Lotus Cobra 56.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (15)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.26 · 24.0% (895 of 3,735 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.00 · 19.6% (859 of 4,385 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.42 · 17.1% (314 of 1,839 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.29 · 7.9% (2,149 of 27,246 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.96 · 13.0% (184 of 1,417 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.90 · 19.3% (72 of 373 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.56 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.76 · 3.1% (80 of 2,587 decks)
- Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.62 · 3.3% (30 of 909 decks)
- Dogmeat, Ever Loyal relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (104 of 5,478 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (5 of 114 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Preston Garvey, Minuteman relevance 0.19 · 1.0% (11 of 1,070 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.06 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.72 · 53.8% (2,730 of 5,078 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.54 · 47.2% (2,399 of 5,078 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.52 · 42.8% (2,171 of 5,078 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.51 · 47.8% (2,429 of 5,078 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.49 · 54.7% (2,778 of 5,078 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 56.6% (2,875 of 5,078 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.45 · 55.4% (2,814 of 5,078 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.37 · 35.7% (1,813 of 5,078 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.29 · 35.8% (1,820 of 5,078 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.29 · 35.0% (1,775 of 5,078 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.26 · 50.8% (2,580 of 5,078 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 52.2% (2,653 of 5,078 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (1,802 of 5,078 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.15 · 39.7% (2,016 of 5,078 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.15 · 33.7% (1,709 of 5,078 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.15 · 28.9% (1,467 of 5,078 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.14 · 35.3% (1,790 of 5,078 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 34.0% (1,728 of 5,078 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.11 · 49.3% (2,502 of 5,078 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.00 · 26.9% (1,364 of 5,078 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.00 · 35.5% (1,804 of 5,078 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.99 · 37.4% (1,898 of 5,078 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 36.2% (1,838 of 5,078 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,594 of 5,078 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.94 · 28.3% (1,436 of 5,078 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.89 · 21.4% (1,085 of 5,078 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (1,556 of 5,078 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (976 of 5,078 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.86 · 21.9% (1,112 of 5,078 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.85 · 23.0% (1,166 of 5,078 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.72 · 53.8% (2,730 of 5,078 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.54 · 47.2% (2,399 of 5,078 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.52 · 42.8% (2,171 of 5,078 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.49 · 54.7% (2,778 of 5,078 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 56.6% (2,875 of 5,078 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.29 · 35.8% (1,820 of 5,078 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 52.2% (2,653 of 5,078 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (1,802 of 5,078 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.15 · 39.7% (2,016 of 5,078 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.14 · 35.3% (1,790 of 5,078 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 34.0% (1,728 of 5,078 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.11 · 49.3% (2,502 of 5,078 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.00 · 35.5% (1,804 of 5,078 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 36.2% (1,838 of 5,078 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,594 of 5,078 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (1,556 of 5,078 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.85 · 23.0% (1,166 of 5,078 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.85 · 27.9% (1,415 of 5,078 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.85 · 20.5% (1,041 of 5,078 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.45 · 55.4% (2,814 of 5,078 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.29 · 35.0% (1,775 of 5,078 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.15 · 33.7% (1,709 of 5,078 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.51 · 47.8% (2,429 of 5,078 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.00 · 26.9% (1,364 of 5,078 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.94 · 28.3% (1,436 of 5,078 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.26 · 50.8% (2,580 of 5,078 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.99 · 37.4% (1,898 of 5,078 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.89 · 21.4% (1,085 of 5,078 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.37 · 35.7% (1,813 of 5,078 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.15 · 28.9% (1,467 of 5,078 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (976 of 5,078 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.86 · 21.9% (1,112 of 5,078 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (1,804 of 5,078 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.14 · 33.7% (1,709 of 5,078 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.13 · 33.2% (1,686 of 5,078 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.12 · 33.0% (1,677 of 5,078 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.12 · 32.8% (1,665 of 5,078 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.12 · 33.0% (1,676 of 5,078 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.10 · 32.1% (1,628 of 5,078 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.09 · 31.4% (1,593 of 5,078 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.07 · 30.7% (1,560 of 5,078 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.00 · 28.5% (1,449 of 5,078 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.99 · 27.1% (1,375 of 5,078 decks)
All lands (7)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.05 · 33.0% (1,674 of 5,078 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.04 · 32.8% (1,667 of 5,078 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.02 · 32.0% (1,626 of 5,078 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.96 · 28.4% (1,443 of 5,078 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.95 · 27.0% (1,371 of 5,078 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 0.89 · 24.3% (1,234 of 5,078 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.86 · 22.4% (1,140 of 5,078 decks)
EDH data for Crucible of Worlds: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,078 real decks.
























































