Cards like Manabarbs
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other red decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other red decks
Cards
- Manabarbs 82%
- Burning Earth 63%
Cards like From the Ashes
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Sulfuric Vortex
13× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other red decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other red decks
Cards
- Sulfuric Vortex 66%
- Roiling Vortex 42%
Cards like Rampaging Ferocidon
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other red decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other red decks
Cards
- Rampaging Ferocidon 47%
- Sunspine Lynx 43%
Cards like Harsh Mentor
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other red decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other red decks
Cards
- Harsh Mentor 65%
- Immolation Shaman 25%
Cards like Tremble
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other red decks
Cards like Furnace of Rath
2.7× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other red decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other red decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other red decks
Cards
- Furnace of Rath 38%
- Fiery Emancipation 29%
- Dictate of the Twin Gods 17%
- City on Fire 11%
- Gratuitous Violence 10%
Other options: Curse of Bloodletting, Bitter Feud
Cards like Spellshock
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other red decks
Cards
- Spellshock 56%
- Pyrostatic Pillar 21%
- Aether Sting 3%
Cards like Ruination
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other red decks
Cards
- Ruination 43%
- Wake of Destruction 13%
- Boom // Bust 11%
Cards like Arcane Signet
4.6× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 58% of other red decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other red decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other red decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 70%
- Commander's Sphere 25%
Cards like Scytheclaw Raptor
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other red decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other red decks
Cards like Dwarven Driller
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other red decks
Cards
- Dwarven Driller 18%
- Dwarven Blastminer 18%
- Dwarven Miner 15%
Cards like Fire Diamond
7.0× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other red decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other red decks
Cards
- Fire Diamond 48%
- Coldsteel Heart 16%
- Prismatic Lens 5%
- Star Compass 5%
Other options: Guardian Idol, Corrupted Grafstone, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Vandalblast
8.5× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other red decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other red decks
Cards like Molten Rain
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other red decks
Cards
- Molten Rain 18%
- Roiling Terrain 16%
- Lava Blister 6%
- Melt Terrain 2%
Cards like Krenko's Buzzcrusher
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Torbran, Thane of Red Fell
18× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other red decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other red decks
Cards like Winter Moon
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other red decks
Cards
- Winter Moon 22%
- Winter Orb 14%
Cards like Red Elemental Blast
1.5× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other red decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other red decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other red decks
Cards
- Red Elemental Blast 28%
- Pyroblast 22%
- Burnout 2%
Cards like Pillage
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other red decks
Cards
Other options: Vandalize, Fissure Vent, Rain of Rust, Sunder from Within, Violent Impact, Volcanic Submersion, Plunder
Cards like Reforge the Soul
3.5× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other red decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Crawlspace
4.5× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other red decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other red decks
Cards
- Crawlspace 22%
- Silent Arbiter 13%
Cards like Seething Song
1.2× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other red decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other red decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.60 in other red decks
Cards
- Seething Song 37%
- Pyretic Ritual 19%
- Desperate Ritual 14%
Cards like Wildfire
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other red decks
Cards like Darksteel Ingot
11× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other red decks
Cards
Other options: Blitzball, Network Terminal, All-Fates Scroll, Murmuring Volume, Bandit's Haul, Letter of Acceptance, Fountain of Ichor, Starting Column, Spinning Wheel
Cards like Gilded Lotus
3.9× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other red decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other red decks
Cards like Acidic Soil
3.4× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other red decks
Cards
- Acidic Soil 31%
- Flame Rift 6%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
2.3× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other red decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other red decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ring of the Lucii, Ur-Golem's Eye, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Citadel of Pain
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other red decks
Cards
- Citadel of Pain 39%
- Power Surge 3%
Cards like Dingus Egg
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other red decks
Cards like Abrade
1.4× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other red decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other red decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other red decks
Cards
- Abrade 39%
- Fiery Confluence 9%
Other options: Molten Blast, Reckless Air Strike, Explosive Derailment, Shredded Sails, Overwhelming Surge, Slight Malfunction, Start from Scratch
Cards like Akki Blizzard-Herder
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.1× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 81% of other red decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other red decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.92 in other red decks
All top picks (50)
- Ankh of Mishra relevance 0.76 · 85.4% (1,196 of 1,400 decks)
- From the Ashes relevance 0.87 · 55.4% (776 of 1,400 decks)
- Dingus Egg relevance 0.92 · 50.1% (701 of 1,400 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.93 · 42.1% (590 of 1,400 decks)
- Tunnel Ignus relevance 0.92 · 39.8% (557 of 1,400 decks)
- Akki Blizzard-Herder relevance 0.92 · 34.8% (487 of 1,400 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.55 · 81.9% (1,146 of 1,400 decks)
- Tremble relevance 0.96 · 26.9% (377 of 1,400 decks)
- Tectonic Instability relevance 0.90 · 32.7% (458 of 1,400 decks)
- Cemetery Gatekeeper relevance 0.75 · 50.2% (703 of 1,400 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.94 · 28.1% (393 of 1,400 decks)
- Burning Earth relevance 0.65 · 63.4% (888 of 1,400 decks)
- Keldon Firebombers relevance 0.93 · 27.5% (385 of 1,400 decks)
- Impending Disaster relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (434 of 1,400 decks)
- Invader Parasite relevance 0.92 · 22.8% (319 of 1,400 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.59 · 65.2% (913 of 1,400 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 0.65 · 55.1% (772 of 1,400 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 0.79 · 34.4% (482 of 1,400 decks)
- Spellshock relevance 0.62 · 56.1% (786 of 1,400 decks)
- Epicenter relevance 0.92 · 18.8% (263 of 1,400 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.74 · 39.2% (549 of 1,400 decks)
- Wildfire relevance 0.87 · 23.4% (328 of 1,400 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.71 · 43.2% (605 of 1,400 decks)
- Krenko's Buzzcrusher relevance 0.79 · 29.2% (409 of 1,400 decks)
- Tectonic Break relevance 0.90 · 16.1% (225 of 1,400 decks)
- Ruination relevance 0.66 · 42.6% (597 of 1,400 decks)
- Mana Web relevance 0.86 · 13.9% (195 of 1,400 decks)
- Roiling Terrain relevance 0.83 · 16.1% (225 of 1,400 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.76 · 22.2% (311 of 1,400 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.68 · 32.7% (458 of 1,400 decks)
- Pillage relevance 0.77 · 21.0% (294 of 1,400 decks)
- Dwarven Driller relevance 0.79 · 18.2% (255 of 1,400 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.66 · 36.1% (506 of 1,400 decks)
- Rampaging Ferocidon relevance 0.58 · 47.1% (660 of 1,400 decks)
- Molten Rain relevance 0.78 · 17.7% (248 of 1,400 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 0.71 · 25.2% (353 of 1,400 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 0.47 · 66.3% (928 of 1,400 decks)
- Detritivore relevance 0.89 · 9.7% (136 of 1,400 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.62 · 35.9% (503 of 1,400 decks)
- Price of Progress relevance 0.47 · 62.8% (879 of 1,400 decks)
- Acidic Soil relevance 0.64 · 30.6% (429 of 1,400 decks)
- Wake of Destruction relevance 0.78 · 13.4% (188 of 1,400 decks)
- Burning Sands relevance 0.83 · 10.3% (144 of 1,400 decks)
- Thoughts of Ruin relevance 0.85 · 9.1% (127 of 1,400 decks)
- Obsidian Fireheart relevance 0.76 · 13.5% (189 of 1,400 decks)
- Eidolon of the Great Revel relevance 0.63 · 30.4% (425 of 1,400 decks)
- Pyrostatic Pillar relevance 0.69 · 20.7% (290 of 1,400 decks)
- Geomancer's Gambit relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (208 of 1,400 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 0.52 · 44.9% (629 of 1,400 decks)
- Mine Layer relevance 0.78 · 10.4% (146 of 1,400 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.93 · 42.1% (590 of 1,400 decks)
- Tunnel Ignus relevance 0.92 · 39.8% (557 of 1,400 decks)
- Akki Blizzard-Herder relevance 0.92 · 34.8% (487 of 1,400 decks)
- Cemetery Gatekeeper relevance 0.75 · 50.2% (703 of 1,400 decks)
- Keldon Firebombers relevance 0.93 · 27.5% (385 of 1,400 decks)
- Invader Parasite relevance 0.92 · 22.8% (319 of 1,400 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.59 · 65.2% (913 of 1,400 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 0.79 · 34.4% (482 of 1,400 decks)
- Krenko's Buzzcrusher relevance 0.79 · 29.2% (409 of 1,400 decks)
- Dwarven Driller relevance 0.79 · 18.2% (255 of 1,400 decks)
- Rampaging Ferocidon relevance 0.58 · 47.1% (660 of 1,400 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 0.71 · 25.2% (353 of 1,400 decks)
- Detritivore relevance 0.89 · 9.7% (136 of 1,400 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.62 · 35.9% (503 of 1,400 decks)
- Obsidian Fireheart relevance 0.76 · 13.5% (189 of 1,400 decks)
- Eidolon of the Great Revel relevance 0.63 · 30.4% (425 of 1,400 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 0.52 · 44.9% (629 of 1,400 decks)
- Mine Layer relevance 0.78 · 10.4% (146 of 1,400 decks)
- Viashino Heretic relevance 0.74 · 12.6% (177 of 1,400 decks)
- Orcish Settlers relevance 0.82 · 7.1% (99 of 1,400 decks)
- Dwarven Blastminer relevance 0.66 · 17.5% (245 of 1,400 decks)
- Magebane Lizard relevance 0.62 · 18.1% (253 of 1,400 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.60 · 18.2% (255 of 1,400 decks)
- Dwarven Miner relevance 0.61 · 15.1% (212 of 1,400 decks)
- Razorkin Needlehead relevance 0.45 · 39.4% (551 of 1,400 decks)
- Magmatic Hellkite relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (169 of 1,400 decks)
- Magus of the Moon relevance 0.46 · 36.8% (515 of 1,400 decks)
- Sunspine Lynx relevance 0.43 · 43.1% (603 of 1,400 decks)
- Stigma Lasher relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (108 of 1,400 decks)
- Scab-Clan Berserker relevance 0.67 · 7.3% (102 of 1,400 decks)
- Treasure Nabber relevance 0.40 · 47.3% (662 of 1,400 decks)
- Embermaw Hellion relevance 0.61 · 9.4% (131 of 1,400 decks)
- Gleeful Arsonist relevance 0.57 · 10.9% (152 of 1,400 decks)
- Solphim, Mayhem Dominus relevance 0.35 · 51.5% (721 of 1,400 decks)
- Iron Myr relevance 0.37 · 44.1% (618 of 1,400 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 0.29 · 68.0% (952 of 1,400 decks)
- Zhao, the Moon Slayer relevance 0.51 · 14.1% (197 of 1,400 decks)
- Ojer Axonil, Deepest Might // Temple of Power relevance 0.40 · 31.9% (446 of 1,400 decks)
- Sandworm relevance 0.70 · 3.9% (55 of 1,400 decks)
- Hearthborn Battler relevance 0.56 · 4.8% (67 of 1,400 decks)
- Fanatic of Mogis relevance 0.40 · 20.3% (284 of 1,400 decks)
- Magus of the Wheel relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (292 of 1,400 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (178 of 1,400 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.40 · 15.0% (210 of 1,400 decks)
- Obsidian Charmaw relevance 0.55 · 4.3% (60 of 1,400 decks)
- Daredevil, Fearless Fighter relevance 0.61 · 3.4% (47 of 1,400 decks)
- Goblin Ruinblaster relevance 0.61 · 3.3% (46 of 1,400 decks)
- Charmbreaker Devils relevance 0.53 · 4.1% (58 of 1,400 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.36 · 15.1% (212 of 1,400 decks)
- Avalanche Riders relevance 0.66 · 2.6% (37 of 1,400 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ankh of Mishra relevance 0.76 · 85.4% (1,196 of 1,400 decks)
- Dingus Egg relevance 0.92 · 50.1% (701 of 1,400 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.94 · 28.1% (393 of 1,400 decks)
- Mana Web relevance 0.86 · 13.9% (195 of 1,400 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.76 · 22.2% (311 of 1,400 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.68 · 32.7% (458 of 1,400 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.66 · 17.8% (249 of 1,400 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.67 · 13.5% (189 of 1,400 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.60 · 14.4% (202 of 1,400 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.58 · 15.5% (217 of 1,400 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.54 · 21.8% (305 of 1,400 decks)
- Heart of Ramos relevance 0.68 · 6.2% (87 of 1,400 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.61 · 9.6% (135 of 1,400 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.49 · 22.4% (314 of 1,400 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.50 · 19.1% (268 of 1,400 decks)
- Pristine Talisman relevance 0.61 · 5.4% (76 of 1,400 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (351 of 1,400 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.43 · 22.1% (310 of 1,400 decks)
- Skyclave Relic relevance 0.57 · 5.1% (72 of 1,400 decks)
- Sun Droplet relevance 0.67 · 3.9% (55 of 1,400 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.54 · 6.6% (92 of 1,400 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.35 · 35.9% (502 of 1,400 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.42 · 16.4% (229 of 1,400 decks)
- Glittering Stockpile relevance 0.40 · 19.8% (277 of 1,400 decks)
- Dingus Staff relevance 0.67 · 3.3% (46 of 1,400 decks)
- Isolation Cell relevance 0.72 · 2.8% (39 of 1,400 decks)
- Resurrection Orb relevance 0.50 · 5.2% (73 of 1,400 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.28 · 47.9% (670 of 1,400 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.52 · 4.6% (64 of 1,400 decks)
- Orb of Dreams relevance 0.69 · 2.7% (38 of 1,400 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.38 · 14.6% (205 of 1,400 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.37 · 14.8% (207 of 1,400 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.46 · 6.1% (85 of 1,400 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.44 · 6.6% (92 of 1,400 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.31 · 30.1% (421 of 1,400 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.41 · 8.6% (121 of 1,400 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (110 of 1,400 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.56 · 3.4% (47 of 1,400 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (82 of 1,400 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.43 · 4.8% (67 of 1,400 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.41 · 5.1% (72 of 1,400 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (66 of 1,400 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (87 of 1,400 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.23 · 45.9% (642 of 1,400 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.32 · 14.2% (199 of 1,400 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (187 of 1,400 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.36 · 8.8% (123 of 1,400 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.57 · 2.6% (36 of 1,400 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (95 of 1,400 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (102 of 1,400 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.55 · 81.9% (1,146 of 1,400 decks)
- Tectonic Instability relevance 0.90 · 32.7% (458 of 1,400 decks)
- Burning Earth relevance 0.65 · 63.4% (888 of 1,400 decks)
- Impending Disaster relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (434 of 1,400 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 0.65 · 55.1% (772 of 1,400 decks)
- Spellshock relevance 0.62 · 56.1% (786 of 1,400 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.74 · 39.2% (549 of 1,400 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.66 · 36.1% (506 of 1,400 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 0.47 · 66.3% (928 of 1,400 decks)
- Burning Sands relevance 0.83 · 10.3% (144 of 1,400 decks)
- Pyrostatic Pillar relevance 0.69 · 20.7% (290 of 1,400 decks)
- Impatience relevance 0.83 · 7.4% (103 of 1,400 decks)
- Roiling Vortex relevance 0.51 · 41.9% (586 of 1,400 decks)
- Furnace of Rath relevance 0.52 · 38.2% (535 of 1,400 decks)
- Rivalry relevance 0.80 · 5.4% (75 of 1,400 decks)
- Smoke relevance 0.55 · 27.2% (381 of 1,400 decks)
- Stranglehold relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (242 of 1,400 decks)
- Blood Sun relevance 0.66 · 9.2% (129 of 1,400 decks)
- Mechanized Warfare relevance 0.47 · 30.1% (422 of 1,400 decks)
- Leyline of Combustion relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (118 of 1,400 decks)
- Leyline of Punishment relevance 0.60 · 9.5% (133 of 1,400 decks)
- Enchanter's Bane relevance 0.62 · 7.4% (104 of 1,400 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 0.57 · 4.9% (68 of 1,400 decks)
- Blood Moon relevance 0.31 · 50.6% (708 of 1,400 decks)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 0.40 · 16.9% (236 of 1,400 decks)
- Repercussion relevance 0.40 · 13.8% (193 of 1,400 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 0.66 · 3.1% (43 of 1,400 decks)
- Powerbalance relevance 0.40 · 12.7% (178 of 1,400 decks)
- Court of Ire relevance 0.52 · 4.4% (62 of 1,400 decks)
- Tectonic Reformation relevance 0.50 · 4.5% (63 of 1,400 decks)
- Fiery Emancipation relevance 0.31 · 29.1% (408 of 1,400 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.33 · 20.1% (281 of 1,400 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (113 of 1,400 decks)
- Glacial Crevasses relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (48 of 1,400 decks)
- Aether Sting relevance 0.56 · 2.8% (39 of 1,400 decks)
- Maddening Hex relevance 0.46 · 3.9% (55 of 1,400 decks)
- Braid of Fire relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (75 of 1,400 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (142 of 1,400 decks)
- Ancient Runes relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (40 of 1,400 decks)
- Spiked Corridor // Torture Pit relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (52 of 1,400 decks)
- Artist's Talent relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (86 of 1,400 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (89 of 1,400 decks)
- Count on Luck relevance 0.32 · 7.2% (101 of 1,400 decks)
- Outpost Siege relevance 0.32 · 6.6% (93 of 1,400 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (160 of 1,400 decks)
- Spiteful Banditry relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (66 of 1,400 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (122 of 1,400 decks)
- Fated Firepower relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (55 of 1,400 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (83 of 1,400 decks)
- Virtue of Courage // Embereth Blaze relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (35 of 1,400 decks)
All instants (31)
- Price of Progress relevance 0.47 · 62.8% (879 of 1,400 decks)
- Boil relevance 0.70 · 10.1% (141 of 1,400 decks)
- Volcanic Offering relevance 0.65 · 8.9% (125 of 1,400 decks)
- Seismic Strike relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (100 of 1,400 decks)
- Reverberate relevance 0.36 · 22.4% (313 of 1,400 decks)
- Risk Factor relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (74 of 1,400 decks)
- Wild Magic Surge relevance 0.33 · 16.8% (235 of 1,400 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.28 · 28.4% (398 of 1,400 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (72 of 1,400 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.27 · 21.6% (303 of 1,400 decks)
- Desperate Ritual relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (194 of 1,400 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.27 · 18.7% (262 of 1,400 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.23 · 17.3% (242 of 1,400 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.20 · 31.2% (437 of 1,400 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.18 · 37.4% (524 of 1,400 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.20 · 29.7% (416 of 1,400 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (212 of 1,400 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.18 · 36.9% (516 of 1,400 decks)
- Fork relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (38 of 1,400 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.21 · 17.9% (250 of 1,400 decks)
- Guff Rewrites History relevance 0.40 · 2.5% (35 of 1,400 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.18 · 24.6% (344 of 1,400 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.15 · 38.9% (544 of 1,400 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (215 of 1,400 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (38 of 1,400 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (93 of 1,400 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.10 · 63.0% (882 of 1,400 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (112 of 1,400 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (36 of 1,400 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (38 of 1,400 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (57 of 1,400 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- From the Ashes relevance 0.87 · 55.4% (776 of 1,400 decks)
- Tremble relevance 0.96 · 26.9% (377 of 1,400 decks)
- Epicenter relevance 0.92 · 18.8% (263 of 1,400 decks)
- Wildfire relevance 0.87 · 23.4% (328 of 1,400 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.71 · 43.2% (605 of 1,400 decks)
- Tectonic Break relevance 0.90 · 16.1% (225 of 1,400 decks)
- Ruination relevance 0.66 · 42.6% (597 of 1,400 decks)
- Roiling Terrain relevance 0.83 · 16.1% (225 of 1,400 decks)
- Pillage relevance 0.77 · 21.0% (294 of 1,400 decks)
- Molten Rain relevance 0.78 · 17.7% (248 of 1,400 decks)
- Acidic Soil relevance 0.64 · 30.6% (429 of 1,400 decks)
- Wake of Destruction relevance 0.78 · 13.4% (188 of 1,400 decks)
- Thoughts of Ruin relevance 0.85 · 9.1% (127 of 1,400 decks)
- Geomancer's Gambit relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (208 of 1,400 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 0.77 · 10.6% (148 of 1,400 decks)
- Bend or Break relevance 0.81 · 7.1% (100 of 1,400 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (158 of 1,400 decks)
- Price of Freedom relevance 0.64 · 16.8% (235 of 1,400 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 0.73 · 9.6% (134 of 1,400 decks)
- Decree of Annihilation relevance 0.74 · 8.2% (115 of 1,400 decks)
- Stone Rain relevance 0.69 · 10.9% (153 of 1,400 decks)
- Lava Blister relevance 0.74 · 6.1% (86 of 1,400 decks)
- Seismic Spike relevance 0.69 · 8.0% (112 of 1,400 decks)
- Icefall relevance 0.73 · 5.4% (76 of 1,400 decks)
- By Force relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (188 of 1,400 decks)
- Worldfire relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (146 of 1,400 decks)
- Shatterstorm relevance 0.63 · 4.3% (60 of 1,400 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.50 · 7.1% (99 of 1,400 decks)
- Reforge the Soul relevance 0.39 · 18.9% (265 of 1,400 decks)
- Devastation relevance 0.67 · 3.3% (46 of 1,400 decks)
- Shattering Spree relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (100 of 1,400 decks)
- Planetary Annihilation relevance 0.58 · 4.1% (58 of 1,400 decks)
- Molten Psyche relevance 0.51 · 4.6% (64 of 1,400 decks)
- Destructive Force relevance 0.66 · 2.6% (36 of 1,400 decks)
- Thieves' Auction relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (50 of 1,400 decks)
- Flame Rift relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (85 of 1,400 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.34 · 15.3% (214 of 1,400 decks)
- Prisoner's Dilemma relevance 0.46 · 4.5% (63 of 1,400 decks)
- Boltwave relevance 0.37 · 9.9% (139 of 1,400 decks)
- Insurrection relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (81 of 1,400 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.33 · 13.4% (187 of 1,400 decks)
- Grab the Prize relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (140 of 1,400 decks)
- Earthquake relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (69 of 1,400 decks)
- Fiery Confluence relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (132 of 1,400 decks)
- Avengers Disassembled relevance 0.52 · 2.9% (41 of 1,400 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (41 of 1,400 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.30 · 13.2% (185 of 1,400 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.17 · 62.8% (879 of 1,400 decks)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.32 · 8.6% (121 of 1,400 decks)
- Reckless Impulse relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (98 of 1,400 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Chandra, Awakened Inferno relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (128 of 1,400 decks)
- Koth of the Hammer relevance 0.48 · 9.0% (126 of 1,400 decks)
- Chandra, Torch of Defiance relevance 0.36 · 24.1% (337 of 1,400 decks)
- Koth, Fire of Resistance relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (215 of 1,400 decks)
- Jaya, Venerated Firemage relevance 0.50 · 3.3% (46 of 1,400 decks)
- Tibalt, Rakish Instigator relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (36 of 1,400 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (36 of 1,400 decks)
- Chandra, Dressed to Kill relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (35 of 1,400 decks)
All utility lands (34)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.67 · 44.8% (627 of 1,400 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.66 · 43.0% (602 of 1,400 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.56 · 33.6% (470 of 1,400 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.63 · 22.9% (321 of 1,400 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.68 · 9.1% (128 of 1,400 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.66 · 9.9% (139 of 1,400 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.53 · 19.7% (276 of 1,400 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.49 · 25.9% (362 of 1,400 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.65 · 5.5% (77 of 1,400 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.32 · 23.7% (332 of 1,400 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.25 · 44.1% (618 of 1,400 decks)
- Shivan Gorge relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (63 of 1,400 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (109 of 1,400 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.26 · 20.9% (292 of 1,400 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (140 of 1,400 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.25 · 12.3% (172 of 1,400 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (40 of 1,400 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (49 of 1,400 decks)
- Shatterskull Smashing // Shatterskull, the Hammer Pass relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (83 of 1,400 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (105 of 1,400 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (41 of 1,400 decks)
- Den of the Bugbear relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (71 of 1,400 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (147 of 1,400 decks)
- Spikefield Hazard // Spikefield Cave relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (44 of 1,400 decks)
- Sokenzan, Crucible of Defiance relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (59 of 1,400 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (70 of 1,400 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (88 of 1,400 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (224 of 1,400 decks)
- Dwarven Mine relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (61 of 1,400 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (35 of 1,400 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (41 of 1,400 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (55 of 1,400 decks)
- Castle Embereth relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (36 of 1,400 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (42 of 1,400 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (7)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.45 · 24.4% (341 of 1,400 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.40 · 15.3% (214 of 1,400 decks)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.59 · 3.9% (54 of 1,400 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (213 of 1,400 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (119 of 1,400 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (42 of 1,400 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.02 · 80.3% (1,124 of 1,400 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Zo-Zu the Punisher, from 1,400 real Commander decks.