Strategic Planning
Played in 510 Azorius decks
2730+4+5+2+23+13+3+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Inspiring Leader 20.5% of decks
Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Inspiring Leader 20.5% of decks
Bruna, Light of Alabaster 2.7% of decks
Bruna, Light of Alabaster 2.7% of decks
Rex, Cyber-Hound 3.1% of decks
Rex, Cyber-Hound 3.1% of decks
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.1% of decks
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.1% of decks
Tura Kennerüd, Skyknight 4.8% of decks
Tura Kennerüd, Skyknight 4.8% of decks
Krile Baldesion 2.5% of decks
Krile Baldesion 2.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Anticipate 18.2% of decks
Anticipate 18.2% of decks
Sleight of Hand 19.6% of decks
Sleight of Hand 19.6% of decks
Fact or Fiction 26.5% of decks
Fact or Fiction 26.5% of decks
Compulsive Research 17.3% of decks
Compulsive Research 17.3% of decks
Frantic Search 38.8% of decks
Frantic Search 38.8% of decks
Impulse 18.2% of decks
Impulse 18.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (27)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Inspiring Leader relevance 1.87 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Bruna, Light of Alabaster relevance 1.74 · 2.7% (48 of 1,748 decks)
- Rex, Cyber-Hound relevance 1.55 · 3.1% (26 of 836 decks)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 1.30 · 1.1% (72 of 6,420 decks)
- Tura Kennerüd, Skyknight relevance 1.20 · 4.8% (8 of 168 decks)
- Krile Baldesion relevance 1.03 · 2.5% (10 of 404 decks)
- Sun-Spider, Nimble Webber relevance 0.97 · 3.1% (7 of 227 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.87 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Noyan Dar, Roil Shaper relevance 0.85 · 1.7% (9 of 532 decks)
- Temmet, Vizier of Naktamun relevance 0.74 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- Dennick, Pious Apprentice // Dennick, Pious Apparition relevance 0.68 · 3.6% (3 of 84 decks)
- Raff, Weatherlight Stalwart relevance 0.66 · 1.2% (7 of 561 decks)
- Veteran Soldier // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.63 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.59 · 1.1% (6 of 534 decks)
- Geist of Saint Traft relevance 0.57 · 1.1% (6 of 566 decks)
- The First Doctor // Jo Grant relevance 0.56 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Gosta Dirk relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken // The Seventh Doctor relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Peri Brown // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Folk Hero // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.29 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.27 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.22 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
- Sokka, Lateral Strategist relevance 0.22 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Anticipate relevance 0.94 · 18.2% (93 of 510 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.90 · 19.6% (100 of 510 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.89 · 26.5% (135 of 510 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.83 · 17.3% (88 of 510 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.79 · 38.8% (198 of 510 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.77 · 18.2% (93 of 510 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.77 · 35.7% (182 of 510 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.71 · 17.5% (89 of 510 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.70 · 21.4% (109 of 510 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (84 of 510 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.66 · 13.7% (70 of 510 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.65 · 25.3% (129 of 510 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.64 · 10.8% (55 of 510 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (61 of 510 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (66 of 510 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.62 · 29.4% (150 of 510 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (82 of 510 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (79 of 510 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (75 of 510 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.59 · 11.8% (60 of 510 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.58 · 18.4% (94 of 510 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.58 · 8.8% (45 of 510 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.57 · 42.2% (215 of 510 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (68 of 510 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (48 of 510 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.54 · 25.5% (130 of 510 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.54 · 12.7% (65 of 510 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (47 of 510 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (80 of 510 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.53 · 12.7% (65 of 510 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (61 of 510 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (54 of 510 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.49 · 10.8% (55 of 510 decks)
- Sage's Row Denizen relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (36 of 510 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.52 · 20.4% (104 of 510 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.52 · 19.0% (97 of 510 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.52 · 23.3% (119 of 510 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.49 · 19.6% (100 of 510 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (63 of 510 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (56 of 510 decks)
- Sage's Reverie relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (57 of 510 decks)
All instants (23)
- Anticipate relevance 0.94 · 18.2% (93 of 510 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.89 · 26.5% (135 of 510 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.79 · 38.8% (198 of 510 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.77 · 18.2% (93 of 510 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.77 · 35.7% (182 of 510 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.71 · 17.5% (89 of 510 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.70 · 21.4% (109 of 510 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.66 · 13.7% (70 of 510 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.65 · 25.3% (129 of 510 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (82 of 510 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (79 of 510 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (75 of 510 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.59 · 11.8% (60 of 510 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.58 · 18.4% (94 of 510 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.57 · 42.2% (215 of 510 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (48 of 510 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.54 · 12.7% (65 of 510 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (47 of 510 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (80 of 510 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.53 · 12.7% (65 of 510 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.52 · 9.2% (47 of 510 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (65 of 510 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.48 · 28.0% (143 of 510 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.90 · 19.6% (100 of 510 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.83 · 17.3% (88 of 510 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (84 of 510 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.64 · 10.8% (55 of 510 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (66 of 510 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.62 · 29.4% (150 of 510 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.58 · 8.8% (45 of 510 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (68 of 510 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.54 · 25.5% (130 of 510 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (86 of 510 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (71 of 510 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.49 · 7.3% (37 of 510 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.48 · 11.8% (60 of 510 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.58 · 28.2% (144 of 510 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.55 · 30.2% (154 of 510 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.50 · 20.2% (103 of 510 decks)
EDH data for Strategic Planning: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 510 real decks.




































































