Aggressive Mammoth
Played in 480 Temur decks
530+40+3+5+2+
Color Identity Spread
3.2% Temur
Commanders
Eshki, Temur's Roar 1.8% of decks
Eshki, Temur's Roar 1.8% of decks
Maelstrom Wanderer 2.0% of decks
Maelstrom Wanderer 2.0% of decks
Surrak Dragonclaw 2.8% of decks
Surrak Dragonclaw 2.8% of decks
Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor 1.1% of decks
Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor 1.1% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tana, the Bloodsower 3.7% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tana, the Bloodsower 3.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 39.6% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 39.6% of decks
Etali, Primal Storm 38.8% of decks
Etali, Primal Storm 38.8% of decks
Ghalta, Primal Hunger 31.9% of decks
Ghalta, Primal Hunger 31.9% of decks
Surrak Dragonclaw 31.5% of decks
Surrak Dragonclaw 31.5% of decks
Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle 22.9% of decks
Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle 22.9% of decks
Temur Battlecrier 42.9% of decks
Temur Battlecrier 42.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Eshki, Temur's Roar relevance 1.93 · 1.8% (152 of 8,675 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.83 · 2.0% (87 of 4,246 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 1.59 · 2.8% (30 of 1,077 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 0.66 · 1.1% (7 of 612 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.09 · 39.6% (190 of 480 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.96 · 38.8% (186 of 480 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.93 · 31.9% (153 of 480 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.92 · 31.5% (151 of 480 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (110 of 480 decks)
- Temur Battlecrier relevance 0.74 · 42.9% (206 of 480 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.73 · 29.6% (142 of 480 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 55.0% (264 of 480 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.71 · 30.2% (145 of 480 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (106 of 480 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.65 · 19.0% (91 of 480 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (71 of 480 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (83 of 480 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.61 · 34.8% (167 of 480 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.61 · 18.1% (87 of 480 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (56 of 480 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 17.7% (85 of 480 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (70 of 480 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (53 of 480 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.55 · 11.7% (56 of 480 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (51 of 480 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (80 of 480 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.53 · 11.3% (54 of 480 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.52 · 20.4% (98 of 480 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (55 of 480 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (81 of 480 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (48 of 480 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (52 of 480 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (65 of 480 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.49 · 23.5% (113 of 480 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.09 · 39.6% (190 of 480 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.96 · 38.8% (186 of 480 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.93 · 31.9% (153 of 480 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.92 · 31.5% (151 of 480 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (110 of 480 decks)
- Temur Battlecrier relevance 0.74 · 42.9% (206 of 480 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.73 · 29.6% (142 of 480 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.71 · 30.2% (145 of 480 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (106 of 480 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.65 · 19.0% (91 of 480 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (71 of 480 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (83 of 480 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.61 · 34.8% (167 of 480 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (56 of 480 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 17.7% (85 of 480 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (70 of 480 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (53 of 480 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.55 · 11.7% (56 of 480 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (51 of 480 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (80 of 480 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.53 · 11.3% (54 of 480 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.52 · 20.4% (98 of 480 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (55 of 480 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (81 of 480 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (48 of 480 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (52 of 480 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (65 of 480 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.49 · 23.5% (113 of 480 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.49 · 21.5% (103 of 480 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (48 of 480 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (61 of 480 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 18.8% (90 of 480 decks)
- Avalanche Tusker relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (35 of 480 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (59 of 480 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (53 of 480 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (35 of 480 decks)
- Shaman of the Great Hunt relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (53 of 480 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.43 · 12.9% (62 of 480 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (47 of 480 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 0.42 · 12.3% (59 of 480 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 55.0% (264 of 480 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.61 · 18.1% (87 of 480 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.47 · 38.8% (186 of 480 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (59 of 480 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.43 · 35.2% (169 of 480 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.43 · 34.2% (164 of 480 decks)
- Genesis Ultimatum relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (69 of 480 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (53 of 480 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (152 of 480 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.45 · 15.6% (75 of 480 decks)
EDH data for Aggressive Mammoth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 480 real decks.

























