Absorb Vis
Played in 142 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
530+16+2+10+18+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.62 · 1.0% (20 of 1,968 decks)
- Xande, Dark Mage relevance 0.82 · 1.4% (3 of 210 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.82 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.73 · 2.2% (2 of 92 decks)
- Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mental Journey relevance 1.28 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Gloomfang Mauler relevance 0.91 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.90 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.78 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.76 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Abnormal Endurance relevance 0.72 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.70 · 26.8% (38 of 142 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.67 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Shardless Outlander relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Jhessian Zombies relevance 0.61 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Spectral Snatcher relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Phthisis relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Afterlife from the Loam relevance 0.57 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.55 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Research the Deep relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.54 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Revive the Fallen relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Ancient Excavation relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Canyon Crawler relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Sorin's Vengeance relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Necromantic Selection relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Razaketh's Rite relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Broken Ambitions relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Gloomfang Mauler relevance 0.91 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.90 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.78 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Shardless Outlander relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Jhessian Zombies relevance 0.61 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Spectral Snatcher relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Canyon Crawler relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Malboro relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.44 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.54 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Captivating Glance relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
All instants (10)
- Mental Journey relevance 1.28 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Abnormal Endurance relevance 0.72 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Ancient Excavation relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Broken Ambitions relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.46 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Spite // Malice relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Fated Return relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Agony Warp relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
All sorceries (18)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.76 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.70 · 26.8% (38 of 142 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.67 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Phthisis relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Afterlife from the Loam relevance 0.57 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.55 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Research the Deep relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Revive the Fallen relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Sorin's Vengeance relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Necromantic Selection relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Razaketh's Rite relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.47 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Weed Strangle relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Rags // Riches relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Zof Consumption // Zof Bloodbog relevance 0.89 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.59 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Umara Wizard // Umara Skyfalls relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
EDH data for Absorb Vis: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 142 real decks.
























































