Stenchskipper
Played in 42 Orzhov decks
130+32+2+3+13+
Color Identity Spread
20.0% Orzhov
Commanders
Most Relevant
Waning Wurm 81.0% of decks
Waning Wurm 81.0% of decks
Rotting Regisaur 88.1% of decks
Rotting Regisaur 88.1% of decks
Woolly Razorback 78.6% of decks
Woolly Razorback 78.6% of decks
Shakedown Heavy 83.3% of decks
Shakedown Heavy 83.3% of decks
Plague Reaver 71.4% of decks
Plague Reaver 71.4% of decks
Nyxathid 78.6% of decks
Nyxathid 78.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Abigale, Eloquent First-Year relevance 2.80 · 1.0% (38 of 3,758 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Waning Wurm relevance 4.01 · 81.0% (34 of 42 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 3.83 · 88.1% (37 of 42 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 3.76 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 3.71 · 83.3% (35 of 42 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 3.59 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 3.58 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 3.45 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 3.35 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 3.31 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Alms Beast relevance 3.28 · 50.0% (21 of 42 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 3.11 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 3.00 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 2.96 · 64.3% (27 of 42 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 2.93 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.81 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.80 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 2.75 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.43 · 50.0% (21 of 42 decks)
- Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner relevance 2.39 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 2.37 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 2.32 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 2.27 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 2.17 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 2.15 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.93 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.91 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.91 · 47.6% (20 of 42 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.82 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 1.72 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.70 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Waning Wurm relevance 4.01 · 81.0% (34 of 42 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 3.83 · 88.1% (37 of 42 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 3.76 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 3.71 · 83.3% (35 of 42 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 3.59 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 3.58 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 3.45 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 3.35 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 3.31 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Alms Beast relevance 3.28 · 50.0% (21 of 42 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 3.11 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 3.00 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 2.96 · 64.3% (27 of 42 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 2.93 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.81 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.80 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 2.75 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.43 · 50.0% (21 of 42 decks)
- Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner relevance 2.39 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 2.32 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 2.27 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 2.17 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 2.15 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.93 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 1.72 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 1.68 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Clackbridge Troll relevance 1.54 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 1.51 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Death's Shadow relevance 1.47 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Yathan Tombguard relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 1.18 · 35.7% (15 of 42 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 1.03 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.82 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.96 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.91 · 47.6% (20 of 42 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.54 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 1.30 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
All instants (13)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 2.37 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.91 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.70 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Personify relevance 1.69 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- Long Road Home relevance 1.65 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Getaway Glamer relevance 1.61 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 1.59 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.54 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Otherworldly Journey relevance 1.48 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 1.42 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- Scrollshift relevance 1.41 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Slip On the Ring relevance 1.33 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Airbender's Reversal relevance 0.95 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
EDH data for Stenchskipper: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 42 real decks.


































