Epic Experiment
Played in 10,484 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
82.8% Izzet
- Izzet 10,484 · 82.8%
- Five-Color 641 · 5.1%
- Grixis 588 · 4.6%
- Jeskai 417 · 3.3%
- Temur 416 · 3.3%
- Other (9) 114 · 0.9%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Zaffai, Thunder Conductor relevance 2.94 · 47.2% (462 of 979 decks)
- The Emperor of Palamecia // The Lord Master of Hell relevance 2.69 · 26.0% (1,217 of 4,682 decks)
- Passionate Archaeologist // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 2.48 · 49.5% (159 of 321 decks)
- Vadrik, Astral Archmage relevance 2.44 · 27.7% (530 of 1,916 decks)
- Mizzix of the Izmagnus relevance 2.30 · 22.2% (658 of 2,958 decks)
- Stella Lee, Wild Card relevance 2.16 · 17.5% (933 of 5,321 decks)
- Melek, Izzet Paragon relevance 1.92 · 23.6% (196 of 832 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 1.43 · 9.2% (599 of 6,539 decks)
- Vivi Ornitier relevance 1.26 · 5.9% (1,667 of 28,220 decks)
- Eris, Roar of the Storm relevance 1.15 · 8.6% (201 of 2,330 decks)
- Lilah, Undefeated Slickshot relevance 1.10 · 9.0% (143 of 1,583 decks)
- Galazeth Prismari relevance 1.08 · 7.6% (216 of 2,825 decks)
- Kaza, Roil Chaser relevance 1.05 · 10.0% (87 of 872 decks)
- Melek, Reforged Researcher relevance 1.05 · 9.3% (104 of 1,124 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.94 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Alania, Divergent Storm relevance 0.91 · 5.1% (360 of 7,039 decks)
- Najal, the Storm Runner relevance 0.85 · 11.2% (28 of 249 decks)
- Passionate Archaeologist // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.80 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Rootha, Mercurial Artist relevance 0.77 · 10.6% (23 of 216 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Dragon Cultist relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Tibor and Lumia relevance 0.70 · 8.5% (25 of 294 decks)
- Gandalf the Grey relevance 0.67 · 5.4% (62 of 1,138 decks)
- Ovika, Enigma Goliath relevance 0.66 · 3.6% (253 of 7,093 decks)
- Magnus the Red relevance 0.66 · 4.1% (147 of 3,601 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Parun relevance 0.62 · 3.2% (258 of 8,021 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.59 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Prismari, the Inspiration relevance 0.59 · 2.8% (361 of 12,821 decks)
- Tellah, Great Sage relevance 0.57 · 4.2% (68 of 1,610 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius relevance 0.57 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Uvilda, Dean of Perfection // Nassari, Dean of Expression relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.87 · 49.4% (5,182 of 10,484 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.70 · 30.9% (3,240 of 10,484 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.70 · 24.4% (2,557 of 10,484 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.69 · 44.9% (4,707 of 10,484 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.68 · 26.0% (2,726 of 10,484 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.67 · 47.9% (5,022 of 10,484 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.63 · 42.9% (4,498 of 10,484 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.62 · 44.8% (4,694 of 10,484 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.60 · 29.4% (3,087 of 10,484 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.60 · 16.2% (1,696 of 10,484 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (1,711 of 10,484 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.57 · 44.8% (4,699 of 10,484 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.56 · 42.3% (4,434 of 10,484 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.56 · 27.3% (2,861 of 10,484 decks)
- Arcane Bombardment relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (1,901 of 10,484 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.55 · 28.8% (3,021 of 10,484 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.54 · 39.8% (4,171 of 10,484 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.53 · 15.4% (1,618 of 10,484 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 0.53 · 22.1% (2,320 of 10,484 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.53 · 26.4% (2,767 of 10,484 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.53 · 16.9% (1,767 of 10,484 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.53 · 24.6% (2,584 of 10,484 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.51 · 42.4% (4,448 of 10,484 decks)
- Rousing Refrain relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (1,948 of 10,484 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.50 · 18.5% (1,938 of 10,484 decks)
- Lock and Load relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (1,432 of 10,484 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.49 · 18.4% (1,931 of 10,484 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (1,627 of 10,484 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (1,303 of 10,484 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.48 · 30.5% (3,194 of 10,484 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.70 · 30.9% (3,240 of 10,484 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.69 · 44.9% (4,707 of 10,484 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.67 · 47.9% (5,022 of 10,484 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.63 · 42.9% (4,498 of 10,484 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 0.53 · 22.1% (2,320 of 10,484 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.53 · 16.9% (1,767 of 10,484 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.53 · 24.6% (2,584 of 10,484 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.47 · 27.3% (2,866 of 10,484 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Parun relevance 0.46 · 30.1% (3,156 of 10,484 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.46 · 10.3% (1,082 of 10,484 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.45 · 18.9% (1,978 of 10,484 decks)
- Stormcatch Mentor relevance 0.45 · 31.6% (3,316 of 10,484 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.45 · 21.4% (2,243 of 10,484 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Arcane Bombardment relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (1,901 of 10,484 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.55 · 28.8% (3,021 of 10,484 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (1,833 of 10,484 decks)
- Clout of the Dominus relevance 0.45 · 12.4% (1,302 of 10,484 decks)
All instants (7)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.68 · 26.0% (2,726 of 10,484 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.57 · 44.8% (4,699 of 10,484 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.56 · 27.3% (2,861 of 10,484 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.51 · 42.4% (4,448 of 10,484 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.50 · 18.5% (1,938 of 10,484 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (1,303 of 10,484 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.44 · 28.4% (2,973 of 10,484 decks)
All sorceries (24)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.87 · 49.4% (5,182 of 10,484 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.70 · 24.4% (2,557 of 10,484 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.62 · 44.8% (4,694 of 10,484 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.60 · 29.4% (3,087 of 10,484 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.60 · 16.2% (1,696 of 10,484 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (1,711 of 10,484 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.56 · 42.3% (4,434 of 10,484 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.54 · 39.8% (4,171 of 10,484 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.53 · 15.4% (1,618 of 10,484 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.53 · 26.4% (2,767 of 10,484 decks)
- Rousing Refrain relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (1,948 of 10,484 decks)
- Lock and Load relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (1,432 of 10,484 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.49 · 18.4% (1,931 of 10,484 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (1,627 of 10,484 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.48 · 30.5% (3,194 of 10,484 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (1,712 of 10,484 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.45 · 14.5% (1,521 of 10,484 decks)
- Elemental Eruption relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (1,326 of 10,484 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 17.6% (1,846 of 10,484 decks)
- Past in Flames relevance 0.45 · 20.7% (2,167 of 10,484 decks)
- Mystic Retrieval relevance 0.45 · 13.8% (1,450 of 10,484 decks)
- Gandalf's Sanction relevance 0.45 · 11.8% (1,232 of 10,484 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.45 · 19.0% (1,995 of 10,484 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (1,386 of 10,484 decks)
All lands (2)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.56 · 42.2% (4,426 of 10,484 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.49 · 35.8% (3,756 of 10,484 decks)
EDH data for Epic Experiment: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 10,484 real decks.