Mad Dog
Played in 78 Red decks
230+29+5+5+9+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
66.1% Red
-
Red 78 · 66.1%
-
Naya 18 · 15.3%
-
Five-Color 6 · 5.1%
-
Boros 4 · 3.4%
-
Rakdos 3 · 2.5%
- Other (6) 9 · 7.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Igneous Cur 88.5% of decks
Igneous Cur 88.5% of decks
Underworld Rage-Hound 88.5% of decks
Underworld Rage-Hound 88.5% of decks
Fiery Hellhound 85.9% of decks
Fiery Hellhound 85.9% of decks
Two-Headed Cerberus 87.2% of decks
Two-Headed Cerberus 87.2% of decks
Ashmouth Hound 83.3% of decks
Ashmouth Hound 83.3% of decks
Mogis's Warhound 79.5% of decks
Mogis's Warhound 79.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Tesak, Judith's Hellhound relevance 5.22 · 22.1% (73 of 331 decks)
- Kamahl, Pit Fighter relevance 0.53 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Igneous Cur relevance 5.98 · 88.5% (69 of 78 decks)
- Underworld Rage-Hound relevance 5.79 · 88.5% (69 of 78 decks)
- Fiery Hellhound relevance 5.71 · 85.9% (67 of 78 decks)
- Two-Headed Cerberus relevance 5.64 · 87.2% (68 of 78 decks)
- Ashmouth Hound relevance 5.52 · 83.3% (65 of 78 decks)
- Mogis's Warhound relevance 5.47 · 79.5% (62 of 78 decks)
- Bolt Hound relevance 5.37 · 85.9% (67 of 78 decks)
- Immolating Souleater relevance 5.37 · 82.1% (64 of 78 decks)
- Pyre Hound relevance 5.02 · 83.3% (65 of 78 decks)
- Arcbound Tracker relevance 5.02 · 88.5% (69 of 78 decks)
- Hound of Griselbrand relevance 4.76 · 73.1% (57 of 78 decks)
- Akoum Hellhound relevance 4.65 · 83.3% (65 of 78 decks)
- Slumbering Cerberus relevance 4.36 · 71.8% (56 of 78 decks)
- Scrapwork Mutt relevance 4.16 · 75.6% (59 of 78 decks)
- Equilibrium Adept relevance 4.11 · 60.3% (47 of 78 decks)
- Zurgo's Vanguard relevance 4.09 · 69.2% (54 of 78 decks)
- Iron Mastiff relevance 3.93 · 61.5% (48 of 78 decks)
- Chrome Companion relevance 3.85 · 57.7% (45 of 78 decks)
- Chandra's Magmutt relevance 3.74 · 71.8% (56 of 78 decks)
- Dogpile relevance 3.60 · 66.7% (52 of 78 decks)
- Goldhound relevance 3.17 · 84.6% (66 of 78 decks)
- Dragonrage relevance 3.15 · 60.3% (47 of 78 decks)
- Ferocity of the Wilds relevance 2.76 · 55.1% (43 of 78 decks)
- Summon: G.F. Cerberus relevance 2.61 · 52.6% (41 of 78 decks)
- Ambitious Assault relevance 2.35 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Komainu Battle Armor relevance 2.24 · 61.5% (48 of 78 decks)
- Enduring Courage relevance 2.24 · 73.1% (57 of 78 decks)
- War Cadence relevance 1.66 · 34.6% (27 of 78 decks)
- Karplusan Hound relevance 1.45 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 1.44 · 62.8% (49 of 78 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Igneous Cur relevance 5.98 · 88.5% (69 of 78 decks)
- Underworld Rage-Hound relevance 5.79 · 88.5% (69 of 78 decks)
- Fiery Hellhound relevance 5.71 · 85.9% (67 of 78 decks)
- Two-Headed Cerberus relevance 5.64 · 87.2% (68 of 78 decks)
- Ashmouth Hound relevance 5.52 · 83.3% (65 of 78 decks)
- Mogis's Warhound relevance 5.47 · 79.5% (62 of 78 decks)
- Bolt Hound relevance 5.37 · 85.9% (67 of 78 decks)
- Immolating Souleater relevance 5.37 · 82.1% (64 of 78 decks)
- Pyre Hound relevance 5.02 · 83.3% (65 of 78 decks)
- Arcbound Tracker relevance 5.02 · 88.5% (69 of 78 decks)
- Hound of Griselbrand relevance 4.76 · 73.1% (57 of 78 decks)
- Akoum Hellhound relevance 4.65 · 83.3% (65 of 78 decks)
- Slumbering Cerberus relevance 4.36 · 71.8% (56 of 78 decks)
- Scrapwork Mutt relevance 4.16 · 75.6% (59 of 78 decks)
- Equilibrium Adept relevance 4.11 · 60.3% (47 of 78 decks)
- Zurgo's Vanguard relevance 4.09 · 69.2% (54 of 78 decks)
- Iron Mastiff relevance 3.93 · 61.5% (48 of 78 decks)
- Chrome Companion relevance 3.85 · 57.7% (45 of 78 decks)
- Chandra's Magmutt relevance 3.74 · 71.8% (56 of 78 decks)
- Goldhound relevance 3.17 · 84.6% (66 of 78 decks)
- Summon: G.F. Cerberus relevance 2.61 · 52.6% (41 of 78 decks)
- Komainu Battle Armor relevance 2.24 · 61.5% (48 of 78 decks)
- Enduring Courage relevance 2.24 · 73.1% (57 of 78 decks)
- Karplusan Hound relevance 1.45 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 1.40 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 1.26 · 32.1% (25 of 78 decks)
- Thundering Raiju relevance 1.07 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.98 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.98 · 30.8% (24 of 78 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 1.24 · 38.5% (30 of 78 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 1.17 · 25.6% (20 of 78 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 1.02 · 35.9% (28 of 78 decks)
- Hazoret's Monument relevance 0.99 · 50.0% (39 of 78 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.99 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Ferocity of the Wilds relevance 2.76 · 55.1% (43 of 78 decks)
- War Cadence relevance 1.66 · 34.6% (27 of 78 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 1.44 · 62.8% (49 of 78 decks)
- Uncivil Unrest relevance 1.35 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Goblin War Drums relevance 0.99 · 30.8% (24 of 78 decks)
All instants (9)
- Dogpile relevance 3.60 · 66.7% (52 of 78 decks)
- Dragonrage relevance 3.15 · 60.3% (47 of 78 decks)
- Ambitious Assault relevance 2.35 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Volt Charge relevance 1.18 · 25.6% (20 of 78 decks)
- Demoralize relevance 1.17 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Lunar Frenzy relevance 1.09 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 1.07 · 35.9% (28 of 78 decks)
- Falter relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Barge In relevance 0.91 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Kindred Charge relevance 1.07 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 1.13 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
EDH data for Mad Dog: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 78 real decks.







































