Magebane Lizard
Played in 298 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Jund
-
Rakdos 8,162 · 55.6%
-
Red 3,144 · 21.4%
-
Gruul 1,467 · 10.0%
-
Boros 679 · 4.6%
-
Jund 298 · 2.0%
- Other (15) 940 · 6.4%
630+29+3+16+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Yurlok of Scorch Thrash relevance 2.56 · 2.2% (153 of 6,900 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 2.52 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 1.08 · 5.5% (4 of 73 decks)
- Ignacio of Myra's Marvels // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.75 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.43 · 1.1% (2 of 179 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.34 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hearthborn Battler relevance 1.70 · 26.8% (80 of 298 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 1.36 · 29.5% (88 of 298 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 1.32 · 25.2% (75 of 298 decks)
- Mai, Scornful Striker relevance 1.30 · 21.5% (64 of 298 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 1.30 · 36.2% (108 of 298 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 1.28 · 35.2% (105 of 298 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 1.28 · 32.6% (97 of 298 decks)
- Fireglass Mentor relevance 1.27 · 18.5% (55 of 298 decks)
- Gev, Scaled Scorch relevance 1.26 · 23.2% (69 of 298 decks)
- Flamecache Gecko relevance 1.24 · 18.5% (55 of 298 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 1.23 · 30.2% (90 of 298 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 1.22 · 28.9% (86 of 298 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 1.18 · 33.6% (100 of 298 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 1.17 · 30.9% (92 of 298 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 1.09 · 29.2% (87 of 298 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.06 · 25.5% (76 of 298 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.98 · 26.8% (80 of 298 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.98 · 26.5% (79 of 298 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.98 · 27.2% (81 of 298 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.98 · 25.8% (77 of 298 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.96 · 30.2% (90 of 298 decks)
- Agate Instigator relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (62 of 298 decks)
- Ashroot Animist relevance 0.95 · 17.4% (52 of 298 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.92 · 24.5% (73 of 298 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 0.92 · 25.2% (75 of 298 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.87 · 22.8% (68 of 298 decks)
- The Lord of Pain relevance 0.81 · 18.1% (54 of 298 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.79 · 20.5% (61 of 298 decks)
- Alpha Deathclaw relevance 0.79 · 16.8% (50 of 298 decks)
- Leyline Tyrant relevance 0.78 · 19.5% (58 of 298 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Hearthborn Battler relevance 1.70 · 26.8% (80 of 298 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 1.36 · 29.5% (88 of 298 decks)
- Immolation Shaman relevance 1.32 · 25.2% (75 of 298 decks)
- Mai, Scornful Striker relevance 1.30 · 21.5% (64 of 298 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 1.28 · 32.6% (97 of 298 decks)
- Fireglass Mentor relevance 1.27 · 18.5% (55 of 298 decks)
- Gev, Scaled Scorch relevance 1.26 · 23.2% (69 of 298 decks)
- Flamecache Gecko relevance 1.24 · 18.5% (55 of 298 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 1.22 · 28.9% (86 of 298 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 1.09 · 29.2% (87 of 298 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.06 · 25.5% (76 of 298 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.98 · 26.8% (80 of 298 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.98 · 26.5% (79 of 298 decks)
- Agate Instigator relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (62 of 298 decks)
- Ashroot Animist relevance 0.95 · 17.4% (52 of 298 decks)
- The Lord of Pain relevance 0.81 · 18.1% (54 of 298 decks)
- Alpha Deathclaw relevance 0.79 · 16.8% (50 of 298 decks)
- Leyline Tyrant relevance 0.78 · 19.5% (58 of 298 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.76 · 19.1% (57 of 298 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (65 of 298 decks)
- Gleeful Arsonist relevance 0.75 · 16.1% (48 of 298 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 0.75 · 19.8% (59 of 298 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.75 · 12.4% (37 of 298 decks)
- Barbflare Gremlin relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (53 of 298 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.74 · 16.4% (49 of 298 decks)
- Hissing Iguanar relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (34 of 298 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.73 · 22.8% (68 of 298 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.71 · 10.7% (32 of 298 decks)
- Lizard Blades relevance 0.65 · 13.1% (39 of 298 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.98 · 25.8% (77 of 298 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.87 · 22.8% (68 of 298 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (60 of 298 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 1.30 · 36.2% (108 of 298 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 1.28 · 35.2% (105 of 298 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 1.23 · 30.2% (90 of 298 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 1.18 · 33.6% (100 of 298 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 1.17 · 30.9% (92 of 298 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.98 · 27.2% (81 of 298 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.92 · 24.5% (73 of 298 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 0.92 · 25.2% (75 of 298 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.79 · 20.5% (61 of 298 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.77 · 20.1% (60 of 298 decks)
- Burning Earth relevance 0.72 · 15.4% (46 of 298 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (50 of 298 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.71 · 17.8% (53 of 298 decks)
- Spellshock relevance 0.70 · 12.8% (38 of 298 decks)
- Roiling Vortex relevance 0.70 · 12.4% (37 of 298 decks)
- Painful Quandary relevance 0.67 · 15.8% (47 of 298 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.96 · 30.2% (90 of 298 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mudflat Village relevance 0.76 · 11.1% (33 of 298 decks)
EDH data for Magebane Lizard: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 298 real decks.
















































