Take Possession
Played in 97 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
430+8+6+13+10+9+4+
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces
0.48| 2.1%
$2.95 · €3.85$30.89 · €31.49
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer relevance 1.20 · 1.4% (6 of 431 decks)
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 1.03 · 1.6% (4 of 253 decks)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.49 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.48 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Confiscate relevance 2.66 · 44.3% (43 of 97 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 2.15 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Treachery relevance 2.07 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 1.98 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 1.59 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Bribery relevance 1.55 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Mind Control relevance 1.47 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 1.46 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- The Eighth Doctor relevance 1.42 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Temporary Lockdown relevance 1.37 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- The Seventh Doctor relevance 1.35 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Thoughtweft Gambit relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 1.34 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 1.33 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Wipe Away relevance 1.32 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 1.32 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 1.32 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Tidal Force relevance 1.32 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 1.31 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 1.31 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Teferi's Moat relevance 1.31 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 1.31 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 1.31 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 1.30 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Sway of the Stars relevance 1.30 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 1.29 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- The Celestus relevance 1.28 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Last Word relevance 1.28 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 1.28 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 1.28 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
All creatures (8)
- The Eighth Doctor relevance 1.42 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- The Seventh Doctor relevance 1.35 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Tidal Force relevance 1.32 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 1.31 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Tragic Poet relevance 1.26 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 1.24 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- The Fall of Lord Konda // Fragment of Konda relevance 1.24 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 1.21 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 1.32 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- The Celestus relevance 1.28 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 1.25 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 1.23 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Tsabo's Web relevance 1.19 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Thran Temporal Gateway relevance 1.19 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
All enchantments (13)
- Confiscate relevance 2.66 · 44.3% (43 of 97 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 2.15 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Treachery relevance 2.07 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 1.98 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 1.59 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Mind Control relevance 1.47 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Temporary Lockdown relevance 1.37 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 1.32 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Teferi's Moat relevance 1.31 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 1.29 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 1.28 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Tolarian Contempt relevance 1.23 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Squeeze relevance 1.20 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
All instants (10)
- Thoughtweft Gambit relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Wipe Away relevance 1.32 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 1.31 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 1.31 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Last Word relevance 1.28 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Test of Talents relevance 1.26 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Take into Custody relevance 1.26 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 1.25 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Desertion relevance 1.24 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 1.19 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Bribery relevance 1.55 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 1.34 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 1.31 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 1.30 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Sway of the Stars relevance 1.30 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 1.28 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.28 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Temporal Cascade relevance 1.24 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Terashi's Grasp relevance 1.19 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
All planeswalkers (4)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 1.46 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 1.33 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Space Beleren relevance 1.26 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 1.20 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
EDH data for Take Possession: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 97 real decks.























































