Advocate of the Beast
Played in 809 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
809 decks
All commanders (30)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 4.36 · 9.8% (311 of 3,183 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 2.39 · 2.3% (18 of 797 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 1.89 · 2.3% (9 of 384 decks)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.83 · 9.8% (4 of 41 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.36 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.31 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.17 · 1.5% (7 of 465 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 1.11 · 5.6% (3 of 54 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.98 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.97 · 1.6% (2 of 124 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.90 · 1.8% (2 of 110 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.90 · 1.1% (2 of 177 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.84 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.82 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Loot, the Nexus relevance 0.80 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Hulkling, Burgeoning Bruiser relevance 0.75 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.72 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Master Chef // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.72 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.70 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Torsten Von Ursus relevance 0.69 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Joel, Resolute Survivor relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.67 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Moon-Boy, Dino Rider relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Master Chef relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.59 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Old One Eye relevance 0.58 · 1.2% (2 of 163 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.55 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.47 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All parallel cards (4)
All most relevant (30)
- Woodland Liege relevance 3.45 · 45.7% (370 of 809 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 3.00 · 41.5% (336 of 809 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.68 · 36.6% (296 of 809 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 2.07 · 41.9% (339 of 809 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 1.74 · 28.2% (228 of 809 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.63 · 45.1% (365 of 809 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.61 · 28.2% (228 of 809 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.61 · 32.5% (263 of 809 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.59 · 31.5% (255 of 809 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.52 · 21.3% (172 of 809 decks)
- Aether Charge relevance 1.47 · 17.6% (142 of 809 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 1.47 · 29.3% (237 of 809 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.41 · 21.8% (176 of 809 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 1.33 · 15.9% (129 of 809 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.31 · 17.9% (145 of 809 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.30 · 26.6% (215 of 809 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.28 · 24.5% (198 of 809 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 1.26 · 18.2% (147 of 809 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.26 · 18.3% (148 of 809 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 1.23 · 18.7% (151 of 809 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.20 · 20.8% (168 of 809 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.20 · 25.2% (204 of 809 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.15 · 20.8% (168 of 809 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.14 · 17.4% (141 of 809 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.13 · 14.1% (114 of 809 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 1.11 · 16.4% (133 of 809 decks)
- Spined Tyrranax relevance 1.11 · 12.4% (100 of 809 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.10 · 17.8% (144 of 809 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.09 · 20.9% (169 of 809 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 1.09 · 13.5% (109 of 809 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Woodland Liege relevance 3.45 · 45.7% (370 of 809 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 3.00 · 41.5% (336 of 809 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.68 · 36.6% (296 of 809 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 2.07 · 41.9% (339 of 809 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 1.74 · 28.2% (228 of 809 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.63 · 45.1% (365 of 809 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.61 · 28.2% (228 of 809 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.61 · 32.5% (263 of 809 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.59 · 31.5% (255 of 809 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.52 · 21.3% (172 of 809 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.41 · 21.8% (176 of 809 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 1.33 · 15.9% (129 of 809 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.31 · 17.9% (145 of 809 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.30 · 26.6% (215 of 809 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.28 · 24.5% (198 of 809 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 1.26 · 18.2% (147 of 809 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.26 · 18.3% (148 of 809 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 1.23 · 18.7% (151 of 809 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.20 · 20.8% (168 of 809 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.20 · 25.2% (204 of 809 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.15 · 20.8% (168 of 809 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.14 · 17.4% (141 of 809 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.13 · 14.1% (114 of 809 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 1.11 · 16.4% (133 of 809 decks)
- Spined Tyrranax relevance 1.11 · 12.4% (100 of 809 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.10 · 17.8% (144 of 809 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.09 · 20.9% (169 of 809 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 1.09 · 13.5% (109 of 809 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 1.06 · 14.0% (113 of 809 decks)
- Baloth Gorger relevance 1.06 · 11.4% (92 of 809 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.04 · 21.4% (173 of 809 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 1.04 · 15.5% (125 of 809 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.01 · 14.0% (113 of 809 decks)
- Hungry Megasloth relevance 1.01 · 10.1% (82 of 809 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.98 · 13.5% (109 of 809 decks)
- Totem Speaker relevance 0.87 · 8.3% (67 of 809 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 0.86 · 12.2% (99 of 809 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 0.86 · 12.1% (98 of 809 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 0.83 · 14.1% (114 of 809 decks)
- Obstinate Baloth relevance 0.82 · 9.0% (73 of 809 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.80 · 18.4% (149 of 809 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.79 · 20.1% (163 of 809 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Aether Charge relevance 1.47 · 17.6% (142 of 809 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 1.47 · 29.3% (237 of 809 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.06 · 41.2% (333 of 809 decks)
All instants (1)
- Curious Herd relevance 0.82 · 11.7% (95 of 809 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.96 · 21.5% (174 of 809 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.91 · 13.5% (109 of 809 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (129 of 809 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 1.66 · 23.5% (190 of 809 decks)
EDH data for Advocate of the Beast: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 809 real decks.