Cards like Stickytongue Sentinel
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 74%
- Elvish Mystic 64%
- Fyndhorn Elves 52%
- Boreal Druid 17%
- Goobbue Gardener 7%
- Wirewood Elf 5%
- Leaf Gilder 5%
- Woodland Mystic 5%
- Golden Hind 5%
- Druid of the Cowl 5%
- Orochi Sustainer 2%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Elvish Visionary
7.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Visionary 38%
- Llanowar Visionary 24%
- Wall of Blossoms 7%
- Owlbear 5%
- Joraga Visionary 5%
- Multani's Acolyte 5%
- Generous Stray 2%
- Pyknite 2%
Other options: Kavu Climber, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Rhox Oracle
Cards like Stampeding Wildebeests
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arboreal Grazer
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Arboreal Grazer 29%
- Elvish Pioneer 21%
Cards like Farhaven Elf
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 38%
- Primeval Herald 10%
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru 5%
- Yavimaya Granger 5%
- Wild Wanderer 2%
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant
Cards like Eternal Witness
6.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Wildwood Escort
Cards like Apex Devastator
19× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards like Springleaf Drum
4.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Umbilicus
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Umbilicus 17%
- Blood Clock 7%
Cards like Fog
3.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 29%
- Moment's Peace 5%
- Lull 5%
- Thwart the Enemy 2%
- Pause for Reflection 2%
- Winds of Qal Sisma 2%
- Haze of Pollen 2%
- Druid's Deliverance 2%
Other options: Defend the Hearth, Commencement of Festivities, Chameleon Blur, Tanglesap, Terrifying Presence, Root Snare, Serene Sunset, Vine Snare
Cards like Return to Nature
6.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards like Explore
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 40%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Kodama's Reach 31%
- Grow from the Ashes 14%
- Search for Tomorrow 10%
- Far Wanderings 7%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Beneath the Sands 2%
- They Went This Way 2%
- Explosive Vegetation 2%
- Map the Wastes 2%
- Migration Path 2%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Garruk's Packleader
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Territorial Scythecat
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Territorial Scythecat 19%
- Mossborn Hydra 10%
- Foe-liage 7%
- Sazh's Chocobo 7%
- Seedship Agrarian 5%
- Scythecat Cub 5%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 5%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 2%
- Floral Evoker 2%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 2%
- Undergrowth Champion 2%
Other options: Murasa Ranger
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Arbor Elf
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 45%
- Quirion Ranger 10%
- Scryb Ranger 2%
All top picks (50)
- Invasive Species relevance 0.49 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Stickytongue Sentinel relevance 0.44 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Mistbreath Elder relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- First Responder relevance 0.39 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.40 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Stampeding Wildebeests relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Umbilicus relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Stampeding Serow relevance 0.37 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Roaring Primadox relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.25 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.24 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Getaway Car relevance 0.32 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Intrepid Tenderfoot relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.27 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Arachnus Web relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Coiling Stalker relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (15 of 42 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Eldrazi Devastator relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Reverent Silence relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.22 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.21 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Sporecap Spider relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Rambling Possum relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Skyscanner relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Wrecking Beast relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Foe-liage relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Nest Invader relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Professional Wrestler relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Sagu Pummeler relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Invasive Species relevance 0.49 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Stickytongue Sentinel relevance 0.44 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Mistbreath Elder relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- First Responder relevance 0.39 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.40 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Stampeding Wildebeests relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Stampeding Serow relevance 0.37 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Roaring Primadox relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.25 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.24 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Intrepid Tenderfoot relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.27 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Coiling Stalker relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (15 of 42 decks)
- Eldrazi Devastator relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.21 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Sporecap Spider relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Rambling Possum relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Skyscanner relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Wrecking Beast relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Foe-liage relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Nest Invader relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Professional Wrestler relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Sagu Pummeler relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.16 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Papercraft Decoy relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Galactic Wayfarer relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Titanic Bulvox relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Spider-Man, Miles Morales relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Ruin Processor relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Sagu Wildling // Roost Seek relevance 0.21 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Umbilicus relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Getaway Car relevance 0.32 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.22 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Subway Train relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Implement of Ferocity relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.21 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.18 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Pyre of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Bard's Bow relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Horned Helm relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.15 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Veloheart Bike relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Copper Carapace relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Moonglove Extract relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Dragon Mask relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.12 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Lifespark Spellbomb relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Network Terminal relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mirror of Life Trapping relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Ecologist's Terrarium relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Arcane Spyglass relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Trailblazer's Torch relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Bessie, the Doctor's Roadster relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Eternity Vessel relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Maze Skullbomb relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Arachnus Web relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.18 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.11 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.13 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.12 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.12 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.08 · 47.6% (20 of 42 decks)
- Multani's Presence relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.11 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Maze's Mantle relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Broken Fall relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.08 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Howl of the Hunt relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.09 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Vessel of Nascency relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Lifeforce relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.10 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Super Strength relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.09 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Wild Pair relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.09 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Font of Fertility relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.08 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All instants (50)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Wildwood Rebirth relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Untamed Might relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Chorus of Might relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Zuko's Exile relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Diplomatic Relations relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Witch's Web relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Wildsize relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Aspect of Hydra relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.14 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Snare the Skies relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.12 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Sylvan Bounty relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.11 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.09 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Sylvan Might relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Seed of Hope relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Hunger of the Howlpack relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Reverent Silence relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.21 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Commune with Nature relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Shoot Down relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Hunter's Edge relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Shattered Wings relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.14 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.14 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.11 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Expanded Anatomy relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Manifest Dread relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Salvage relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Horncaller's Chant relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Kruphix's Insight relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.10 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.07 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Elven Cache relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Benefaction of Rhonas relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cosmium Confluence relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.10 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.09 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.08 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Blinkmoth Well relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cavernous Maw relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Quicksand relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.10 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.06 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.05 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.04 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.03 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.03 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All lands (36)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.13 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.13 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.11 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Forgotten Monument relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.11 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.10 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Twists and Turns // Mycoid Maze relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Snow-Covered Wastes relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.07 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.07 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.07 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.06 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.04 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.04 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.03 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 81.0% (34 of 42 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, from 42 real Commander decks.