Abundant Harvest
Played in 11,580 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 3.29 · 5.7% (320 of 5,580 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 2.66 · 10.7% (127 of 1,185 decks)
- Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 2.49 · 17.8% (126 of 707 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 2.26 · 9.6% (254 of 2,645 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.81 · 2.9% (264 of 9,235 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 1.79 · 1.5% (181 of 11,862 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 1.72 · 14.2% (37 of 261 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 1.68 · 7.2% (30 of 419 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 1.65 · 1.8% (51 of 2,790 decks)
- Eshki Dragonclaw relevance 1.62 · 2.5% (84 of 3,407 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 1.52 · 2.6% (112 of 4,343 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 1.43 · 3.4% (48 of 1,393 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.40 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Farmer Cotton relevance 1.38 · 5.5% (17 of 309 decks)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 1.36 · 8.0% (36 of 449 decks)
- Felothar, Dawn of the Abzan relevance 1.34 · 1.3% (44 of 3,283 decks)
- Katilda and Lier relevance 1.31 · 2.1% (17 of 805 decks)
- Old Stickfingers relevance 1.28 · 2.2% (36 of 1,609 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Dragon Cultist relevance 1.28 · 75.0% (3 of 4 decks)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 1.27 · 1.2% (142 of 11,822 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.21 · 1.8% (95 of 5,343 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 1.16 · 3.4% (15 of 445 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 1.13 · 4.7% (45 of 953 decks)
- Wort, the Raidmother relevance 1.12 · 2.3% (38 of 1,630 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.10 · 1.7% (81 of 4,724 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.05 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 1.01 · 1.5% (44 of 3,003 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.01 · 3.1% (19 of 616 decks)
- Storm, Force of Nature relevance 1.00 · 1.1% (62 of 5,743 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.00 · 2.7% (98 of 3,605 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Explore relevance 0.84 · 25.7% (2,974 of 11,580 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.80 · 12.3% (1,424 of 11,580 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.74 · 42.4% (4,910 of 11,580 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.67 · 32.4% (3,754 of 11,580 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.64 · 27.7% (3,203 of 11,580 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.58 · 24.8% (2,869 of 11,580 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (1,743 of 11,580 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.54 · 11.9% (1,374 of 11,580 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.52 · 15.7% (1,822 of 11,580 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.51 · 19.8% (2,298 of 11,580 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.50 · 14.6% (1,695 of 11,580 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (1,089 of 11,580 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.46 · 22.9% (2,647 of 11,580 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (1,184 of 11,580 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (1,587 of 11,580 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.43 · 22.0% (2,543 of 11,580 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.43 · 16.5% (1,914 of 11,580 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.39 · 12.6% (1,455 of 11,580 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.39 · 21.0% (2,434 of 11,580 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (1,408 of 11,580 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (1,259 of 11,580 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (1,578 of 11,580 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (1,057 of 11,580 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (844 of 11,580 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (1,185 of 11,580 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.35 · 11.3% (1,305 of 11,580 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.35 · 10.8% (1,248 of 11,580 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (1,111 of 11,580 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (1,038 of 11,580 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (1,114 of 11,580 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.64 · 27.7% (3,203 of 11,580 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.51 · 19.8% (2,298 of 11,580 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (1,259 of 11,580 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (1,578 of 11,580 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (1,185 of 11,580 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.35 · 11.3% (1,305 of 11,580 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.35 · 10.8% (1,248 of 11,580 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (1,111 of 11,580 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (986 of 11,580 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (1,174 of 11,580 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (1,312 of 11,580 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (1,067 of 11,580 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.31 · 15.1% (1,743 of 11,580 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (911 of 11,580 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (1,038 of 11,580 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Abundance relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (1,089 of 11,580 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.43 · 16.5% (1,914 of 11,580 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (1,408 of 11,580 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (844 of 11,580 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (1,118 of 11,580 decks)
All instants (9)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (1,743 of 11,580 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.52 · 15.7% (1,822 of 11,580 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.46 · 22.9% (2,647 of 11,580 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (1,587 of 11,580 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.39 · 12.6% (1,455 of 11,580 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (1,057 of 11,580 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (1,114 of 11,580 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.34 · 17.0% (1,963 of 11,580 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (858 of 11,580 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Explore relevance 0.84 · 25.7% (2,974 of 11,580 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.80 · 12.3% (1,424 of 11,580 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.74 · 42.4% (4,910 of 11,580 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.67 · 32.4% (3,754 of 11,580 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.58 · 24.8% (2,869 of 11,580 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.54 · 11.9% (1,374 of 11,580 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.50 · 14.6% (1,695 of 11,580 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (1,184 of 11,580 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.43 · 22.0% (2,543 of 11,580 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.39 · 21.0% (2,434 of 11,580 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.32 · 8.4% (977 of 11,580 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.32 · 9.3% (1,081 of 11,580 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.32 · 14.4% (1,663 of 11,580 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (775 of 11,580 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (915 of 11,580 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (1,034 of 11,580 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (1,563 of 11,580 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (1,069 of 11,580 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.49 · 28.6% (3,316 of 11,580 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.42 · 21.0% (2,427 of 11,580 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.35 · 9.9% (1,143 of 11,580 decks)
EDH data for Abundant Harvest: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 11,580 real decks.