Telling Time
Played in 536 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Azorius
All commanders (19)
- Noyan Dar, Roil Shaper relevance 2.01 · 6.1% (32 of 523 decks)
- Lyse Hext relevance 1.65 · 2.5% (50 of 1,982 decks)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 1.46 · 1.4% (86 of 6,061 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Far Traveler relevance 1.23 · 33.3% (3 of 9 decks)
- Elminster relevance 1.15 · 1.3% (41 of 3,246 decks)
- Kykar, Zephyr Awakener relevance 0.93 · 1.2% (22 of 1,865 decks)
- Taigam, Ojutai Master relevance 0.88 · 1.6% (12 of 751 decks)
- Niambi, Faithful Healer relevance 0.78 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- Oji, the Exquisite Blade relevance 0.65 · 1.5% (6 of 404 decks)
- Lavinia, Foil to Conspiracy relevance 0.63 · 1.6% (5 of 305 decks)
- Daxos of Meletis relevance 0.58 · 1.4% (5 of 358 decks)
- Alharu, Solemn Ritualist // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Tura Kennerüd, Skyknight relevance 0.51 · 1.8% (3 of 165 decks)
- Azor, the Lawbringer relevance 0.31 · 1.1% (2 of 183 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.22 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Eleventh Doctor relevance 0.22 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
- The Grand Calcutron relevance 0.22 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
- Sokka, Lateral Strategist relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Impulse relevance 1.41 · 33.4% (179 of 536 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 1.22 · 23.7% (127 of 536 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.98 · 56.9% (305 of 536 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.94 · 44.0% (236 of 536 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.91 · 16.6% (89 of 536 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.89 · 29.1% (156 of 536 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.87 · 40.7% (218 of 536 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.85 · 38.8% (208 of 536 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.82 · 22.9% (123 of 536 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.78 · 22.8% (122 of 536 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.75 · 36.9% (198 of 536 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.70 · 15.3% (82 of 536 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.69 · 26.5% (142 of 536 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.68 · 18.1% (97 of 536 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.67 · 20.0% (107 of 536 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.65 · 25.4% (136 of 536 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.63 · 18.3% (98 of 536 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.62 · 12.9% (69 of 536 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (88 of 536 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.60 · 21.8% (117 of 536 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.60 · 21.8% (117 of 536 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.59 · 14.6% (78 of 536 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.59 · 43.5% (233 of 536 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.59 · 15.7% (84 of 536 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (73 of 536 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (78 of 536 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (52 of 536 decks)
- Terminus relevance 0.57 · 13.4% (72 of 536 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.56 · 10.1% (54 of 536 decks)
- Tragic Arrogance relevance 0.56 · 12.1% (65 of 536 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (98 of 536 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (86 of 536 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.65 · 25.4% (136 of 536 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.60 · 21.8% (117 of 536 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.52 · 35.6% (191 of 536 decks)
All instants (28)
- Impulse relevance 1.41 · 33.4% (179 of 536 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 1.22 · 23.7% (127 of 536 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.98 · 56.9% (305 of 536 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.85 · 38.8% (208 of 536 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.78 · 22.8% (122 of 536 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.75 · 36.9% (198 of 536 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.69 · 26.5% (142 of 536 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.68 · 18.1% (97 of 536 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.67 · 20.0% (107 of 536 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.62 · 12.9% (69 of 536 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (88 of 536 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.60 · 21.8% (117 of 536 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.59 · 14.6% (78 of 536 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.59 · 43.5% (233 of 536 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.59 · 15.7% (84 of 536 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (73 of 536 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (78 of 536 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (52 of 536 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.56 · 10.1% (54 of 536 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.56 · 20.0% (107 of 536 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.55 · 16.8% (90 of 536 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.54 · 11.2% (60 of 536 decks)
- Defiant Strike relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (59 of 536 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (69 of 536 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.53 · 19.2% (103 of 536 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (69 of 536 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.51 · 11.4% (61 of 536 decks)
- Rebellious Strike relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (57 of 536 decks)
All sorceries (14)
- Ponder relevance 0.94 · 44.0% (236 of 536 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.91 · 16.6% (89 of 536 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.89 · 29.1% (156 of 536 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.87 · 40.7% (218 of 536 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.82 · 22.9% (123 of 536 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.70 · 15.3% (82 of 536 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.63 · 18.3% (98 of 536 decks)
- Terminus relevance 0.57 · 13.4% (72 of 536 decks)
- Tragic Arrogance relevance 0.56 · 12.1% (65 of 536 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (92 of 536 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (67 of 536 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.54 · 24.6% (132 of 536 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (58 of 536 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (57 of 536 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (74 of 536 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (74 of 536 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.51 · 28.0% (150 of 536 decks)
EDH data for Telling Time: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 536 real decks.