Temporal Spring
Played in 284 Sultai decks
30+33+3+4+7+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
18.6% Sultai
-
Temur 924 · 60.5%
-
Sultai 284 · 18.6%
-
Simic 236 · 15.4%
-
Bant 49 · 3.2%
- Other (5) 35 · 2.3%
Most Relevant
Memory Lapse 58.1% of decks
Memory Lapse 58.1% of decks
Expel from Orazca 32.7% of decks
Expel from Orazca 32.7% of decks
Submerge 28.9% of decks
Submerge 28.9% of decks
High Fae Trickster 54.2% of decks
High Fae Trickster 54.2% of decks
Wizened Snitches 22.9% of decks
Wizened Snitches 22.9% of decks
Bitterbloom Bearer 44.0% of decks
Bitterbloom Bearer 44.0% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Memory Lapse relevance 2.47 · 58.1% (165 of 284 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 2.05 · 32.7% (93 of 284 decks)
- Submerge relevance 1.47 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 1.26 · 54.2% (154 of 284 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 1.25 · 22.9% (65 of 284 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.16 · 44.0% (125 of 284 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.16 · 47.2% (134 of 284 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 1.07 · 39.4% (112 of 284 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 1.05 · 39.4% (112 of 284 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 1.03 · 37.3% (106 of 284 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 1.03 · 34.5% (98 of 284 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.01 · 38.0% (108 of 284 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.98 · 34.2% (97 of 284 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.93 · 18.3% (52 of 284 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 40.8% (116 of 284 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.91 · 32.4% (92 of 284 decks)
- Faebloom Trick relevance 0.91 · 25.4% (72 of 284 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.90 · 30.6% (87 of 284 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.87 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.85 · 29.9% (85 of 284 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.84 · 27.1% (77 of 284 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.83 · 19.7% (56 of 284 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.82 · 56.0% (159 of 284 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (81 of 284 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.80 · 26.4% (75 of 284 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.79 · 44.7% (127 of 284 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.79 · 33.8% (96 of 284 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (69 of 284 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.78 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.78 · 31.3% (89 of 284 decks)
All creatures (33)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 1.26 · 54.2% (154 of 284 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 1.25 · 22.9% (65 of 284 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.16 · 44.0% (125 of 284 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.16 · 47.2% (134 of 284 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 1.03 · 37.3% (106 of 284 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 1.03 · 34.5% (98 of 284 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.01 · 38.0% (108 of 284 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.98 · 34.2% (97 of 284 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 40.8% (116 of 284 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.91 · 32.4% (92 of 284 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.90 · 30.6% (87 of 284 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.87 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.84 · 27.1% (77 of 284 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.82 · 56.0% (159 of 284 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (81 of 284 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.80 · 26.4% (75 of 284 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.79 · 44.7% (127 of 284 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.79 · 33.8% (96 of 284 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (69 of 284 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.78 · 31.3% (89 of 284 decks)
- Faerie Harbinger relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (62 of 284 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (60 of 284 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.75 · 20.8% (59 of 284 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.74 · 31.3% (89 of 284 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.74 · 21.1% (60 of 284 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.72 · 31.7% (90 of 284 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.72 · 40.5% (115 of 284 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.71 · 25.4% (72 of 284 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.67 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.67 · 29.2% (83 of 284 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (46 of 284 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.66 · 21.8% (62 of 284 decks)
- Quickling relevance 0.66 · 16.5% (47 of 284 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.93 · 18.3% (52 of 284 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.74 · 24.6% (70 of 284 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.72 · 20.8% (59 of 284 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Bitterblossom relevance 1.07 · 39.4% (112 of 284 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 1.05 · 39.4% (112 of 284 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.85 · 29.9% (85 of 284 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (45 of 284 decks)
All instants (7)
- Memory Lapse relevance 2.47 · 58.1% (165 of 284 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 2.05 · 32.7% (93 of 284 decks)
- Submerge relevance 1.47 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- Faebloom Trick relevance 0.91 · 25.4% (72 of 284 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.78 · 28.9% (82 of 284 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.69 · 22.2% (63 of 284 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.67 · 20.8% (59 of 284 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.83 · 19.7% (56 of 284 decks)
- Stolen by the Fae relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (60 of 284 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.91 · 33.5% (95 of 284 decks)
EDH data for Temporal Spring: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 284 real decks.































