Invulnerability
Played in 50 Boros decks
130+16+13+2+3+7+5+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Searing Touch 68.0% of decks
Searing Touch 68.0% of decks
Haze of Rage 74.0% of decks
Haze of Rage 74.0% of decks
Shellshock 64.0% of decks
Shellshock 64.0% of decks
Sentinel Tower 64.0% of decks
Sentinel Tower 64.0% of decks
Stormsplitter 64.0% of decks
Stormsplitter 64.0% of decks
Astral Cornucopia 70.0% of decks
Astral Cornucopia 70.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Sami, Wildcat Captain relevance 2.76 · 1.1% (39 of 3,479 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Searing Touch relevance 4.54 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Haze of Rage relevance 4.46 · 74.0% (37 of 50 decks)
- Shellshock relevance 4.34 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Sentinel Tower relevance 4.06 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Stormsplitter relevance 3.80 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 3.77 · 70.0% (35 of 50 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 3.77 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Séance Board relevance 3.75 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Skyclave Relic relevance 3.65 · 70.0% (35 of 50 decks)
- Gandalf, White Rider relevance 3.63 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 3.28 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 3.27 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 3.12 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 3.04 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 2.98 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Inspired Tinkering relevance 2.91 · 74.0% (37 of 50 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 2.78 · 70.0% (35 of 50 decks)
- Decaying Time Loop relevance 2.75 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Thunderdrum Soloist relevance 2.72 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Ashling, Flame Dancer relevance 2.70 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Kessig Flamebreather relevance 2.63 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Cori-Steel Cutter relevance 2.57 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Wojek Investigator relevance 2.54 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Bandit's Haul relevance 2.54 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 2.53 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 2.46 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 2.42 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Bothersome Quasit relevance 2.41 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Stirring Hopesinger relevance 2.40 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Rite of the Dragoncaller relevance 2.39 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Stormsplitter relevance 3.80 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Gandalf, White Rider relevance 3.63 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Thunderdrum Soloist relevance 2.72 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Ashling, Flame Dancer relevance 2.70 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Kessig Flamebreather relevance 2.63 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Wojek Investigator relevance 2.54 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 2.53 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 2.42 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Bothersome Quasit relevance 2.41 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Stirring Hopesinger relevance 2.40 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Caldera Pyremaw relevance 2.38 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Leonin Lightscribe relevance 2.32 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Longshot, Rebel Bowman relevance 2.20 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Illustrious Wanderglyph relevance 2.11 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 2.03 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 1.98 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
All artifacts (13)
- Sentinel Tower relevance 4.06 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 3.77 · 70.0% (35 of 50 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 3.77 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Séance Board relevance 3.75 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Skyclave Relic relevance 3.65 · 70.0% (35 of 50 decks)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 3.28 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 3.27 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 3.12 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 3.04 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 2.98 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 2.78 · 70.0% (35 of 50 decks)
- Cori-Steel Cutter relevance 2.57 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Bandit's Haul relevance 2.54 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 2.46 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Rite of the Dragoncaller relevance 2.39 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
All instants (3)
- Searing Touch relevance 4.54 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Shellshock relevance 4.34 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Decaying Time Loop relevance 2.75 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Haze of Rage relevance 4.46 · 74.0% (37 of 50 decks)
- Inspired Tinkering relevance 2.91 · 74.0% (37 of 50 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 2.37 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Snort relevance 2.30 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 2.18 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 2.08 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Improvisation Capstone relevance 1.92 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 2.45 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Dimension X relevance 2.07 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Restless Bivouac relevance 1.98 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.94 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Needle Spires relevance 1.92 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
All lands (4)
- Raucous Carnival relevance 2.56 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 2.10 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Alpine Meadow relevance 2.03 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 2.00 · 74.0% (37 of 50 decks)
EDH data for Invulnerability: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 50 real decks.














































