Brooding Saurian
Played in 82 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
630+40+2+5+2+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 1.05 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.73 · 1.4% (2 of 146 decks)
- Giant-Man, Gargantuan Genius relevance 0.72 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Greensleeves relevance 0.48 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.44 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.42 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.99 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.78 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.75 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Vengevine relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.73 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.68 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.66 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.66 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.64 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.64 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.63 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.62 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.61 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Neverwinter Dryad relevance 0.61 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Bloodspore Thrinax relevance 0.61 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.58 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Bramble Sovereign relevance 0.58 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.57 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Hydra Trainer relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.55 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.99 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.78 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.75 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Vengevine relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.73 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.68 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.66 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.66 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.64 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.64 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.63 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.62 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.61 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Neverwinter Dryad relevance 0.61 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Bloodspore Thrinax relevance 0.61 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Bramble Sovereign relevance 0.58 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.57 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Hydra Trainer relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.55 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.55 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.53 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.52 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.52 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.52 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.51 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.51 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.50 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.50 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.50 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.50 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.50 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.58 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.50 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.55 · 42.7% (35 of 82 decks)
All lands (1)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.59 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Brooding Saurian: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.





































