Cryptic Annelid
Played in 708 Blue decks
1630+17+2+5+11+7+1+7+
Color Identity Spread
9.1% Blue
-
Azorius 4,729 · 60.7%
-
Simic 2,015 · 25.9%
-
Blue 708 · 9.1%
- Other (14) 342 · 4.4%
Commanders
Matoya, Archon Elder 41.1% of decks
Matoya, Archon Elder 41.1% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Siani, Eye of the Storm 40.3% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Siani, Eye of the Storm 40.3% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 68.2% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 68.2% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur 41.7% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur 41.7% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // The Prismatic Piper 100.0% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // The Prismatic Piper 100.0% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces 33.3% of decks
Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces 33.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Mystic Speculation 54.7% of decks
Mystic Speculation 54.7% of decks
Deliberate 67.9% of decks
Deliberate 67.9% of decks
Augury Owl 52.1% of decks
Augury Owl 52.1% of decks
Sigiled Starfish 45.1% of decks
Sigiled Starfish 45.1% of decks
Dissolve 57.3% of decks
Dissolve 57.3% of decks
Foresee 42.7% of decks
Foresee 42.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (16)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 4.95 · 41.1% (280 of 682 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 4.86 · 40.3% (258 of 640 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 4.21 · 68.2% (75 of 110 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 2.44 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // The Prismatic Piper relevance 1.45 · 100.0% (3 of 3 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.92 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Proft, Consulting Detective relevance 0.86 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.58 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Alrund, God of the Cosmos // Hakka, Whispering Raven relevance 0.56 · 1.7% (5 of 295 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.38 · 1.0% (4 of 397 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 2.80 · 54.7% (387 of 708 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 2.72 · 67.9% (481 of 708 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 2.59 · 52.1% (369 of 708 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 2.33 · 45.1% (319 of 708 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 2.28 · 57.3% (406 of 708 decks)
- Foresee relevance 2.26 · 42.7% (302 of 708 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 2.14 · 46.3% (328 of 708 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 2.06 · 78.7% (557 of 708 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 2.00 · 40.5% (287 of 708 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 1.97 · 39.5% (280 of 708 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 1.88 · 55.9% (396 of 708 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.84 · 38.4% (272 of 708 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 1.83 · 32.8% (232 of 708 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 1.70 · 47.6% (337 of 708 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 1.69 · 29.9% (212 of 708 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 1.66 · 31.2% (221 of 708 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 1.66 · 46.8% (331 of 708 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 1.61 · 28.2% (200 of 708 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 1.50 · 38.0% (269 of 708 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 1.50 · 33.8% (239 of 708 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 1.41 · 27.5% (195 of 708 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (179 of 708 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 1.35 · 27.1% (192 of 708 decks)
- Warden of Evos Isle relevance 1.35 · 32.2% (228 of 708 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 1.31 · 30.9% (219 of 708 decks)
- Preordain relevance 1.29 · 83.8% (593 of 708 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 1.26 · 29.8% (211 of 708 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 1.24 · 22.9% (162 of 708 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.22 · 81.1% (574 of 708 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 1.22 · 22.0% (156 of 708 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Augury Owl relevance 2.59 · 52.1% (369 of 708 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 2.33 · 45.1% (319 of 708 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 2.14 · 46.3% (328 of 708 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 1.97 · 39.5% (280 of 708 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 1.88 · 55.9% (396 of 708 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 1.70 · 47.6% (337 of 708 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 1.66 · 31.2% (221 of 708 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 1.61 · 28.2% (200 of 708 decks)
- Warden of Evos Isle relevance 1.35 · 32.2% (228 of 708 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 1.31 · 30.9% (219 of 708 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 1.18 · 31.8% (225 of 708 decks)
- Serum Sovereign relevance 1.16 · 23.6% (167 of 708 decks)
- Geist of the Archives relevance 1.13 · 18.4% (130 of 708 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 1.12 · 61.9% (438 of 708 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 1.10 · 46.2% (327 of 708 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 1.07 · 31.5% (223 of 708 decks)
- Mindwhisker relevance 1.04 · 17.7% (125 of 708 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crystal Ball relevance 1.69 · 29.9% (212 of 708 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 1.19 · 30.4% (215 of 708 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 1.66 · 46.8% (331 of 708 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 1.41 · 27.5% (195 of 708 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 1.24 · 22.9% (162 of 708 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 1.21 · 21.0% (149 of 708 decks)
- Eyes Everywhere relevance 1.21 · 20.8% (147 of 708 decks)
All instants (11)
- Deliberate relevance 2.72 · 67.9% (481 of 708 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 2.28 · 57.3% (406 of 708 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.84 · 38.4% (272 of 708 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 1.50 · 38.0% (269 of 708 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (179 of 708 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 1.35 · 27.1% (192 of 708 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 1.26 · 29.8% (211 of 708 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.22 · 81.1% (574 of 708 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 1.15 · 26.4% (187 of 708 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 1.13 · 23.6% (167 of 708 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 1.06 · 22.9% (162 of 708 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 2.80 · 54.7% (387 of 708 decks)
- Foresee relevance 2.26 · 42.7% (302 of 708 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 2.06 · 78.7% (557 of 708 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 2.00 · 40.5% (287 of 708 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 1.83 · 32.8% (232 of 708 decks)
- Preordain relevance 1.29 · 83.8% (593 of 708 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 1.22 · 22.0% (156 of 708 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 1.50 · 33.8% (239 of 708 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 2.22 · 47.6% (337 of 708 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 1.92 · 40.7% (288 of 708 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 1.90 · 37.4% (265 of 708 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 1.44 · 57.8% (409 of 708 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 1.08 · 55.8% (395 of 708 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 1.07 · 21.8% (154 of 708 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 1.05 · 19.8% (140 of 708 decks)
EDH data for Cryptic Annelid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 708 real decks.
























































