Calcite Snapper
Played in 83 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
13.7% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 2.48 · 2.4% (27 of 1,109 decks)
- Gandalf, Shadow's Foe relevance 1.39 · 1.6% (7 of 430 decks)
- Donatello, Way with Machines relevance 0.98 · 1.9% (3 of 154 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 0.82 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains // April O'Neil, Live on the Scene relevance 0.73 · 1.6% (2 of 125 decks)
- Soramaro, First to Dream relevance 0.58 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.44 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.40 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Windrider Eel relevance 1.37 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 1.33 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 1.31 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Tideforce Elemental relevance 1.21 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.11 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Scroll Thief relevance 1.06 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.04 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Guardian of Tazeem relevance 1.03 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 1.01 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Trench Behemoth relevance 0.88 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.88 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.88 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.84 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.84 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 0.83 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.82 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.79 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.78 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Riptide Pilferer relevance 0.77 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Jhessian Thief relevance 0.75 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.75 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Ancient Crab relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.73 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Angler Turtle relevance 0.72 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Hands of Binding relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Prying Blade relevance 0.69 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Neurok Commando relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Windrider Eel relevance 1.37 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 1.33 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 1.31 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Tideforce Elemental relevance 1.21 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.11 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Scroll Thief relevance 1.06 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.04 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Guardian of Tazeem relevance 1.03 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Trench Behemoth relevance 0.88 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.88 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.88 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 0.83 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.82 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.79 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Riptide Pilferer relevance 0.77 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Jhessian Thief relevance 0.75 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.75 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Ancient Crab relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Angler Turtle relevance 0.72 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Neurok Commando relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Roil Cartographer relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Crystacean relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.63 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Eternal of Harsh Truths relevance 0.61 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Canyon Crab relevance 0.59 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Merfolk Thaumaturgist relevance 0.54 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Elven Raft-Steerer relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 1.01 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.84 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.78 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.73 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Prying Blade relevance 0.69 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.64 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.61 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Staff of the Mind Magus relevance 0.58 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.84 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.61 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Hands of Binding relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Last Thoughts relevance 0.60 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
All lands (5)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.71 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.62 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.53 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.52 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
EDH data for Calcite Snapper: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 83 real decks.