230+42+1+2+1+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Oliphaunt 45.2% of decks
Oliphaunt 45.2% of decks
Generous Ent 42.5% of decks
Generous Ent 42.5% of decks
Titanoth Rex 37.7% of decks
Titanoth Rex 37.7% of decks
Living Death 46.6% of decks
Living Death 46.6% of decks
Troll of Khazad-dûm 43.2% of decks
Troll of Khazad-dûm 43.2% of decks
Striped Riverwinder 35.6% of decks
Striped Riverwinder 35.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder relevance 0.93 · 2.5% (138 of 5,590 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.19 · 1.6% (3 of 189 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.99 · 45.2% (66 of 146 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 1.95 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.88 · 37.7% (55 of 146 decks)
- Living Death relevance 1.88 · 46.6% (68 of 146 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 1.87 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 1.86 · 35.6% (52 of 146 decks)
- Waker of Waves relevance 1.81 · 34.2% (50 of 146 decks)
- Street Wraith relevance 1.74 · 39.0% (57 of 146 decks)
- Desert Cerodon relevance 1.67 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 1.63 · 32.2% (47 of 146 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.63 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.57 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 1.57 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 1.54 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Demonic Dread relevance 1.54 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.53 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Violent Outburst relevance 1.52 · 44.5% (65 of 146 decks)
- Monstrous Carabid relevance 1.51 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.49 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 1.47 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 1.42 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Canyon Crawler relevance 1.40 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Deadshot Minotaur relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Malboro relevance 1.39 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Chitin Gravestalker relevance 1.39 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 1.38 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Archfiend of Ifnir relevance 1.38 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Eldrazi Ravager relevance 1.36 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Lava Serpent relevance 1.35 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.99 · 45.2% (66 of 146 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 1.95 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.88 · 37.7% (55 of 146 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 1.87 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 1.86 · 35.6% (52 of 146 decks)
- Waker of Waves relevance 1.81 · 34.2% (50 of 146 decks)
- Street Wraith relevance 1.74 · 39.0% (57 of 146 decks)
- Desert Cerodon relevance 1.67 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 1.63 · 32.2% (47 of 146 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.63 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.57 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 1.57 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 1.54 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.53 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Monstrous Carabid relevance 1.51 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.49 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 1.47 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 1.42 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Canyon Crawler relevance 1.40 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Deadshot Minotaur relevance 1.39 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Malboro relevance 1.39 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Chitin Gravestalker relevance 1.39 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 1.38 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Archfiend of Ifnir relevance 1.38 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Eldrazi Ravager relevance 1.36 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Lava Serpent relevance 1.35 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Ruin Grinder relevance 1.35 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 1.35 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Shefet Archfiend relevance 1.34 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 1.33 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Drownyard Lurker relevance 1.33 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.28 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 1.28 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.27 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Hill Gigas relevance 1.26 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Furnace Host Charger relevance 1.25 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 1.23 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 1.23 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Harvester of Misery relevance 1.18 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Yidaro, Wandering Monster relevance 1.13 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Halo Forager relevance 1.13 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Fluctuator relevance 1.33 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- New Perspectives relevance 1.15 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Unpredictable Cyclone relevance 1.14 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
All instants (1)
- Violent Outburst relevance 1.52 · 44.5% (65 of 146 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Living Death relevance 1.88 · 46.6% (68 of 146 decks)
- Demonic Dread relevance 1.54 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Glimpse of Tomorrow relevance 1.30 · 29.5% (43 of 146 decks)
- Hypergenesis relevance 1.15 · 27.4% (40 of 146 decks)
EDH data for Living End: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 146 real decks.



























