Power Sink
Played in 966 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Mizzix of the Izmagnus relevance 3.62 · 10.4% (303 of 2,919 decks)
- Magnus the Red relevance 2.27 · 3.9% (139 of 3,577 decks)
- Vadrik, Astral Archmage relevance 2.08 · 4.2% (80 of 1,899 decks)
- Tellah, Great Sage relevance 0.81 · 1.2% (19 of 1,594 decks)
- Melek, Izzet Paragon relevance 0.59 · 1.1% (9 of 830 decks)
- Kaza, Roil Chaser relevance 0.58 · 1.0% (9 of 866 decks)
- Baeloth Barrityl, Entertainer // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.55 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.52 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tibor and Lumia relevance 0.35 · 1.0% (3 of 290 decks)
- Johann, Apprentice Sorcerer relevance 0.34 · 1.6% (2 of 126 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.55 · 32.3% (312 of 966 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 1.40 · 35.2% (340 of 966 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.29 · 23.9% (231 of 966 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 1.22 · 30.3% (293 of 966 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.14 · 39.9% (385 of 966 decks)
- Mindswipe relevance 1.14 · 23.2% (224 of 966 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 1.12 · 30.5% (295 of 966 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (341 of 966 decks)
- Storm King's Thunder relevance 0.99 · 25.6% (247 of 966 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.99 · 33.0% (319 of 966 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.98 · 31.7% (306 of 966 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.87 · 20.4% (197 of 966 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (136 of 966 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.86 · 29.0% (280 of 966 decks)
- Firemind's Foresight relevance 0.85 · 19.5% (188 of 966 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.82 · 19.4% (187 of 966 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (201 of 966 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.80 · 17.0% (164 of 966 decks)
- Mystic Retrieval relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (237 of 966 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.78 · 22.7% (219 of 966 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.78 · 28.8% (278 of 966 decks)
- Banefire relevance 0.78 · 18.8% (182 of 966 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.77 · 24.4% (236 of 966 decks)
- Fireball relevance 0.76 · 18.9% (183 of 966 decks)
- Fanning the Flames relevance 0.75 · 13.0% (126 of 966 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (175 of 966 decks)
- Past in Flames relevance 0.73 · 33.9% (327 of 966 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 0.72 · 12.8% (124 of 966 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.71 · 30.4% (294 of 966 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.70 · 12.9% (125 of 966 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.82 · 19.4% (187 of 966 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.51 · 23.7% (229 of 966 decks)
All instants (26)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.55 · 32.3% (312 of 966 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 1.40 · 35.2% (340 of 966 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.29 · 23.9% (231 of 966 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 1.22 · 30.3% (293 of 966 decks)
- Mindswipe relevance 1.14 · 23.2% (224 of 966 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (341 of 966 decks)
- Storm King's Thunder relevance 0.99 · 25.6% (247 of 966 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.99 · 33.0% (319 of 966 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (136 of 966 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.86 · 29.0% (280 of 966 decks)
- Firemind's Foresight relevance 0.85 · 19.5% (188 of 966 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (201 of 966 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.80 · 17.0% (164 of 966 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.78 · 28.8% (278 of 966 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (175 of 966 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 0.72 · 12.8% (124 of 966 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.70 · 12.9% (125 of 966 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.68 · 18.4% (178 of 966 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (108 of 966 decks)
- Reality Spasm relevance 0.65 · 11.0% (106 of 966 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.64 · 19.9% (192 of 966 decks)
- Reiterate relevance 0.63 · 22.6% (218 of 966 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.60 · 16.7% (161 of 966 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.60 · 10.6% (102 of 966 decks)
- Fall of the Titans relevance 0.57 · 10.4% (100 of 966 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (126 of 966 decks)
All sorceries (21)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.14 · 39.9% (385 of 966 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 1.12 · 30.5% (295 of 966 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.98 · 31.7% (306 of 966 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.87 · 20.4% (197 of 966 decks)
- Mystic Retrieval relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (237 of 966 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.78 · 22.7% (219 of 966 decks)
- Banefire relevance 0.78 · 18.8% (182 of 966 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.77 · 24.4% (236 of 966 decks)
- Fireball relevance 0.76 · 18.9% (183 of 966 decks)
- Fanning the Flames relevance 0.75 · 13.0% (126 of 966 decks)
- Past in Flames relevance 0.73 · 33.9% (327 of 966 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.71 · 30.4% (294 of 966 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.62 · 13.0% (126 of 966 decks)
- Silver Scrutiny relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (108 of 966 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (134 of 966 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (197 of 966 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (133 of 966 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.50 · 37.5% (362 of 966 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (84 of 966 decks)
- Song of Totentanz relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (114 of 966 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (84 of 966 decks)
All lands (1)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.51 · 25.4% (245 of 966 decks)
EDH data for Power Sink: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 966 real decks.