Charging Cinderhorn
Played in 82 Dune-Brood decks
Color Identity Spread
6.3% Dune-Brood
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Saskia the Unyielding relevance 0.89 · 1.9% (78 of 4,159 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 3.73 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Grab the Reins relevance 3.72 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 3.68 · 82.9% (68 of 82 decks)
- Sylvok Explorer relevance 3.68 · 85.4% (70 of 82 decks)
- Treacherous Terrain relevance 3.68 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Quirion Explorer relevance 3.61 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 3.59 · 84.1% (69 of 82 decks)
- Wilderness Elemental relevance 3.57 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 3.55 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 3.54 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Frenzied Fugue relevance 3.53 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Grave Upheaval relevance 3.51 · 76.8% (63 of 82 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 3.51 · 93.9% (77 of 82 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 3.51 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 3.50 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 3.46 · 74.4% (61 of 82 decks)
- Everlasting Torment relevance 3.41 · 78.0% (64 of 82 decks)
- Order // Chaos relevance 3.41 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Wight of Precinct Six relevance 3.40 · 72.0% (59 of 82 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 3.35 · 90.2% (74 of 82 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 3.29 · 84.1% (69 of 82 decks)
- Selesnya Guildmage relevance 3.29 · 69.5% (57 of 82 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 3.26 · 68.3% (56 of 82 decks)
- Korozda Guildmage relevance 3.23 · 73.2% (60 of 82 decks)
- Breath of Fury relevance 3.20 · 80.5% (66 of 82 decks)
- Brutal Hordechief relevance 3.19 · 92.7% (76 of 82 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 3.19 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 3.14 · 89.0% (73 of 82 decks)
- Sunforger relevance 3.13 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 3.06 · 76.8% (63 of 82 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 3.73 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Sylvok Explorer relevance 3.68 · 85.4% (70 of 82 decks)
- Quirion Explorer relevance 3.61 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 3.59 · 84.1% (69 of 82 decks)
- Wilderness Elemental relevance 3.57 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 3.55 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 3.51 · 93.9% (77 of 82 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 3.51 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 3.50 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Wight of Precinct Six relevance 3.40 · 72.0% (59 of 82 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 3.35 · 90.2% (74 of 82 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 3.29 · 84.1% (69 of 82 decks)
- Selesnya Guildmage relevance 3.29 · 69.5% (57 of 82 decks)
- Korozda Guildmage relevance 3.23 · 73.2% (60 of 82 decks)
- Brutal Hordechief relevance 3.19 · 92.7% (76 of 82 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 3.14 · 89.0% (73 of 82 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 3.06 · 76.8% (63 of 82 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 3.02 · 82.9% (68 of 82 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender relevance 2.96 · 80.5% (66 of 82 decks)
- Thelonite Hermit relevance 2.85 · 69.5% (57 of 82 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 2.77 · 84.1% (69 of 82 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 2.71 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Ankle Shanker relevance 2.57 · 84.1% (69 of 82 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sunforger relevance 3.13 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 2.58 · 91.5% (75 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Frenzied Fugue relevance 3.53 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Everlasting Torment relevance 3.41 · 78.0% (64 of 82 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 3.26 · 68.3% (56 of 82 decks)
- Breath of Fury relevance 3.20 · 80.5% (66 of 82 decks)
- Necrogenesis relevance 2.92 · 70.7% (58 of 82 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 2.76 · 85.4% (70 of 82 decks)
All instants (9)
- Grab the Reins relevance 3.72 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 3.54 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 3.46 · 74.4% (61 of 82 decks)
- Order // Chaos relevance 3.41 · 81.7% (67 of 82 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 2.93 · 91.5% (75 of 82 decks)
- Utter End relevance 2.90 · 87.8% (72 of 82 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 2.73 · 92.7% (76 of 82 decks)
- Crackling Doom relevance 2.65 · 91.5% (75 of 82 decks)
- Artifact Mutation relevance 2.52 · 95.1% (78 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Clan Defiance relevance 3.68 · 82.9% (68 of 82 decks)
- Treacherous Terrain relevance 3.68 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Grave Upheaval relevance 3.51 · 76.8% (63 of 82 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 3.19 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 2.46 · 89.0% (73 of 82 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 3.16 · 85.4% (70 of 82 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 2.80 · 82.9% (68 of 82 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 2.65 · 85.4% (70 of 82 decks)
All lands (2)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 2.69 · 78.0% (64 of 82 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 2.49 · 78.0% (64 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Charging Cinderhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.