Crush Dissent
Played in 106 Azorius decks
230+2+1+47+
Color Identity Spread
6.2% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Contradict 56.6% of decks
Contradict 56.6% of decks
Counterlash 53.8% of decks
Counterlash 53.8% of decks
Complicate 52.8% of decks
Complicate 52.8% of decks
Broken Concentration 49.1% of decks
Broken Concentration 49.1% of decks
Convolute 59.4% of decks
Convolute 59.4% of decks
Countermand 51.9% of decks
Countermand 51.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.44 · 1.1% (73 of 6,514 decks)
- Temmet, Vizier of Naktamun relevance 0.83 · 1.3% (3 of 224 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Contradict relevance 3.74 · 56.6% (60 of 106 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.66 · 53.8% (57 of 106 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.46 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 3.38 · 49.1% (52 of 106 decks)
- Convolute relevance 3.38 · 59.4% (63 of 106 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.36 · 51.9% (55 of 106 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.24 · 53.8% (57 of 106 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 3.23 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.17 · 50.0% (53 of 106 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 3.04 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 3.02 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.95 · 47.2% (50 of 106 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.95 · 49.1% (52 of 106 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.93 · 47.2% (50 of 106 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.91 · 45.3% (48 of 106 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.89 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.88 · 50.9% (54 of 106 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.87 · 50.0% (53 of 106 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.83 · 51.9% (55 of 106 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.81 · 46.2% (49 of 106 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.79 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.77 · 47.2% (50 of 106 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.76 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.72 · 51.9% (55 of 106 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.72 · 39.6% (42 of 106 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.71 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.71 · 42.5% (45 of 106 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.69 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.66 · 46.2% (49 of 106 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.60 · 43.4% (46 of 106 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 2.44 · 35.8% (38 of 106 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 2.33 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 2.43 · 38.7% (41 of 106 decks)
All instants (47)
- Contradict relevance 3.74 · 56.6% (60 of 106 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.66 · 53.8% (57 of 106 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.46 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 3.38 · 49.1% (52 of 106 decks)
- Convolute relevance 3.38 · 59.4% (63 of 106 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.36 · 51.9% (55 of 106 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.24 · 53.8% (57 of 106 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 3.23 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.17 · 50.0% (53 of 106 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 3.04 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 3.02 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.95 · 47.2% (50 of 106 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.95 · 49.1% (52 of 106 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.93 · 47.2% (50 of 106 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.91 · 45.3% (48 of 106 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.89 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.88 · 50.9% (54 of 106 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.87 · 50.0% (53 of 106 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.83 · 51.9% (55 of 106 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.81 · 46.2% (49 of 106 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.79 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.77 · 47.2% (50 of 106 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.76 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.72 · 51.9% (55 of 106 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.72 · 39.6% (42 of 106 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.71 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.71 · 42.5% (45 of 106 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.69 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.66 · 46.2% (49 of 106 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.60 · 43.4% (46 of 106 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 2.57 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Cancel relevance 2.54 · 64.2% (68 of 106 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 2.50 · 52.8% (56 of 106 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 2.47 · 37.7% (40 of 106 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 2.45 · 45.3% (48 of 106 decks)
- Condescend relevance 2.43 · 50.9% (54 of 106 decks)
- Confound relevance 2.42 · 49.1% (52 of 106 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 2.42 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.40 · 42.5% (45 of 106 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.38 · 48.1% (51 of 106 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 2.38 · 37.7% (40 of 106 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 2.36 · 36.8% (39 of 106 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 2.33 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 2.32 · 46.2% (49 of 106 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.31 · 40.6% (43 of 106 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 2.29 · 44.3% (47 of 106 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 2.28 · 39.6% (42 of 106 decks)
EDH data for Crush Dissent: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 106 real decks.





















