Cephalid Looter
Played in 52 Simic decks
230+45+2+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Nadir Kraken 36.5% of decks
Nadir Kraken 36.5% of decks
Tromokratis 38.5% of decks
Tromokratis 38.5% of decks
Serpent of Yawning Depths 42.3% of decks
Serpent of Yawning Depths 42.3% of decks
Monstrosity of the Lake 30.8% of decks
Monstrosity of the Lake 30.8% of decks
Octoprophet 21.2% of decks
Octoprophet 21.2% of decks
Grappling Kraken 34.6% of decks
Grappling Kraken 34.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- D'Vana Tendi, Optimistic Ensign relevance 0.82 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 1.34 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 1.27 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.26 · 42.3% (22 of 52 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.22 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.20 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 1.17 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.17 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 1.15 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 1.14 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.14 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.13 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.13 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.12 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 1.11 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 1.08 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 1.06 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.05 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 1.03 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.02 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.00 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.00 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.00 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.96 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.96 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.96 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.95 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Unruly Krasis relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 1.34 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 1.27 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.26 · 42.3% (22 of 52 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.22 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.20 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Reservoir Kraken relevance 1.17 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.17 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 1.15 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 1.14 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.13 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.13 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 1.12 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 1.11 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 1.08 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 1.06 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.05 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 1.03 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.02 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.00 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 1.00 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.00 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.96 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.96 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.95 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Unruly Krasis relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.93 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.92 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Simic Sky Swallower relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood relevance 0.88 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Benthic Anomaly relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.85 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.81 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.81 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.79 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.78 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.76 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Shipbreaker Kraken relevance 0.69 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.68 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.66 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 1.14 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.71 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
All instants (1)
- High Tide relevance 0.69 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.96 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
All lands (1)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.64 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Looter: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 52 real decks.
























