Phantasmal Sphere
Played in 38 Dimir decks
130+27+9+2+7+2+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
30.2% Dimir
Commanders
Most Relevant
Chamber of Manipulation 44.7% of decks
Chamber of Manipulation 44.7% of decks
Master of the Feast 65.8% of decks
Master of the Feast 65.8% of decks
Lost Jitte 47.4% of decks
Lost Jitte 47.4% of decks
Phyrexian Soulgorger 60.5% of decks
Phyrexian Soulgorger 60.5% of decks
Atomic Microsizer 42.1% of decks
Atomic Microsizer 42.1% of decks
Conformer Shuriken 39.5% of decks
Conformer Shuriken 39.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Lydia Frye relevance 0.56 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 2.80 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 2.71 · 65.8% (25 of 38 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 2.70 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 2.62 · 60.5% (23 of 38 decks)
- Atomic Microsizer relevance 2.61 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 2.50 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 2.35 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Serendib Efreet relevance 2.32 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.95 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Intervene relevance 1.86 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Inkfathom Infiltrator relevance 1.75 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Garland, Royal Kidnapper relevance 1.72 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 1.70 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Qarsi Revenant relevance 1.65 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Prying Blade relevance 1.65 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Ebondeath, Dracolich relevance 1.57 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 1.45 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 1.41 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 1.32 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Tidehollow Strix relevance 1.30 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 1.28 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 1.28 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.22 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Come Back Wrong relevance 1.21 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 1.20 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 1.14 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 1.12 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 1.08 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 1.06 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Orms-by-Gore relevance 1.06 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Master of the Feast relevance 2.71 · 65.8% (25 of 38 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 2.62 · 60.5% (23 of 38 decks)
- Serendib Efreet relevance 2.32 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.95 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Inkfathom Infiltrator relevance 1.75 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Garland, Royal Kidnapper relevance 1.72 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Qarsi Revenant relevance 1.65 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Ebondeath, Dracolich relevance 1.57 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 1.32 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Tidehollow Strix relevance 1.30 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 1.28 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 1.14 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 1.12 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 1.06 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Orms-by-Gore relevance 1.06 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Ahriman relevance 1.06 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 0.99 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.98 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.97 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.95 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Demonic Taskmaster relevance 0.91 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Lord of the Pit relevance 0.91 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Nighthawk Scavenger relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.86 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Phyrexian Negator relevance 0.86 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Evil Eye of Urborg relevance 0.85 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.84 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All artifacts (9)
- Lost Jitte relevance 2.70 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Atomic Microsizer relevance 2.61 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 2.50 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 2.35 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 1.70 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Prying Blade relevance 1.65 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 1.28 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 1.20 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.96 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 2.80 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 1.08 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All instants (7)
- Intervene relevance 1.86 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 1.45 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 1.41 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.22 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 1.00 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.72 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Come Back Wrong relevance 1.21 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.86 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Homeward Path relevance 2.46 · 63.2% (24 of 38 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 1.01 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
All lands (1)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 1.18 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
EDH data for Phantasmal Sphere: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 38 real decks.







































