Malamet Battle Glyph
Played in 212 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
9.6% Golgari
930+20+2+2+10+11+1+3+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Shelob, Child of Ungoliant relevance 2.25 · 1.1% (71 of 6,718 decks)
- Kraven the Hunter relevance 1.58 · 1.1% (18 of 1,593 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.79 · 3.0% (2 of 66 decks)
- Akawalli, the Seething Tower relevance 0.74 · 1.1% (3 of 269 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.66 · 1.6% (2 of 125 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.43 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda relevance 0.43 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Vraska, the Cutting Glare relevance 0.37 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.36 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.89 · 35.8% (76 of 212 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.75 · 49.5% (105 of 212 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 1.66 · 27.4% (58 of 212 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 1.64 · 31.1% (66 of 212 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 1.32 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 1.26 · 27.8% (59 of 212 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 1.06 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.98 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.98 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.95 · 22.6% (48 of 212 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.93 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.92 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.90 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.89 · 22.6% (48 of 212 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.88 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 0.88 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Chainweb Aracnir relevance 0.87 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Drider relevance 0.87 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.86 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.81 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.81 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 0.81 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.77 · 25.5% (54 of 212 decks)
- Ishkanah, Grafwidow relevance 0.74 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.73 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.70 · 33.5% (71 of 212 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.70 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 0.70 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.67 · 26.9% (57 of 212 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.98 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.93 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 0.88 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Chainweb Aracnir relevance 0.87 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Drider relevance 0.87 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.81 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 0.81 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.77 · 25.5% (54 of 212 decks)
- Ishkanah, Grafwidow relevance 0.74 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.70 · 33.5% (71 of 212 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 0.70 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Skyfisher Spider relevance 0.66 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.66 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 0.66 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.65 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.63 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.60 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Doom Weaver relevance 0.58 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.73 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.65 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.98 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.81 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
All instants (10)
- Tail Swipe relevance 1.64 · 31.1% (66 of 212 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 1.26 · 27.8% (59 of 212 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 1.06 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.95 · 22.6% (48 of 212 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.89 · 22.6% (48 of 212 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.88 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.86 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.70 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.67 · 26.9% (57 of 212 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.89 · 35.8% (76 of 212 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.75 · 49.5% (105 of 212 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 1.66 · 27.4% (58 of 212 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 1.32 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.92 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.90 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Spider Spawning relevance 0.67 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.62 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.58 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.58 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 0.62 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 1.00 · 25.0% (53 of 212 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.61 · 19.3% (41 of 212 decks)
All lands (1)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.59 · 36.8% (78 of 212 decks)
EDH data for Malamet Battle Glyph: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 212 real decks.































































