Gift of the Woods
Played in 98 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (14)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 2.36 · 4.5% (15 of 337 decks)
- Titanbones, Towering Heart relevance 1.89 · 3.2% (10 of 311 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 1.62 · 6.0% (5 of 84 decks)
- Tigra, Feline Fury relevance 1.21 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.13 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
- Isao, Enlightened Bushi relevance 1.04 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Flatman relevance 0.63 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Reptil, Dinomorpher relevance 0.60 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Lady Zhurong, Warrior Queen relevance 0.55 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.51 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.49 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.42 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Track Down relevance 1.41 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Bestial Bloodline relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Ferocity relevance 1.19 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Carapace relevance 1.18 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Ondu Giant relevance 1.17 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 1.17 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 1.16 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.13 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.11 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Greater Basilisk relevance 1.09 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Vorapede relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 1.08 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Zoo Escapees relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Raucous Entertainer relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination relevance 1.06 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 1.04 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.03 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 1.03 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 1.01 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.99 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Snapping Gnarlid relevance 0.97 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.97 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Lifespring Druid relevance 0.96 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Nessian Hornbeetle relevance 0.96 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Commune with Spirits relevance 0.94 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.91 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.90 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Ondu Giant relevance 1.17 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.13 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.11 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Greater Basilisk relevance 1.09 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Vorapede relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Zoo Escapees relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Raucous Entertainer relevance 1.07 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination relevance 1.06 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 1.04 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.03 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 1.01 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Snapping Gnarlid relevance 0.97 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Lifespring Druid relevance 0.96 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Nessian Hornbeetle relevance 0.96 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.90 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Generous Patron relevance 0.88 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Torgal, A Fine Hound relevance 0.82 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Wurm's Tooth relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
All enchantments (15)
- Bestial Bloodline relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Ferocity relevance 1.19 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Carapace relevance 1.18 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 1.17 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 1.16 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 1.03 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.99 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.87 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Primal Frenzy relevance 0.83 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Dryad's Favor relevance 0.81 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Find the Path relevance 0.80 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.77 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.77 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- From Beyond relevance 0.75 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.73 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
All instants (3)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.97 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.78 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.77 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Track Down relevance 1.41 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 1.08 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Commune with Spirits relevance 0.94 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.91 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.85 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.77 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Curse of the Werefox relevance 0.75 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Turtle Lair relevance 1.01 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
All lands (2)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.87 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
EDH data for Gift of the Woods: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 98 real decks.