You See a Guard Approach
Played in 223 Esper decks
130+26+5+6+7+1+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
You Find the Villains' Lair 31.4% of decks
You Find the Villains' Lair 31.4% of decks
Bar the Gate 29.6% of decks
Bar the Gate 29.6% of decks
Hama Pashar, Ruin Seeker 32.7% of decks
Hama Pashar, Ruin Seeker 32.7% of decks
Fly 26.9% of decks
Fly 26.9% of decks
Dungeon Map 25.6% of decks
Dungeon Map 25.6% of decks
Barrowin of Clan Undurr 29.6% of decks
Barrowin of Clan Undurr 29.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar relevance 0.41 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 1.65 · 31.4% (70 of 223 decks)
- Bar the Gate relevance 1.37 · 29.6% (66 of 223 decks)
- Hama Pashar, Ruin Seeker relevance 1.25 · 32.7% (73 of 223 decks)
- Fly relevance 1.23 · 26.9% (60 of 223 decks)
- Dungeon Map relevance 1.18 · 25.6% (57 of 223 decks)
- Barrowin of Clan Undurr relevance 1.18 · 29.6% (66 of 223 decks)
- Eccentric Apprentice relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (49 of 223 decks)
- Yuan-Ti Fang-Blade relevance 1.07 · 20.2% (45 of 223 decks)
- Dungeon Delver relevance 1.07 · 27.4% (61 of 223 decks)
- Delver's Torch relevance 1.07 · 20.2% (45 of 223 decks)
- Yuan-Ti Malison relevance 1.05 · 25.1% (56 of 223 decks)
- Displacer Beast relevance 1.04 · 19.3% (43 of 223 decks)
- Fates' Reversal relevance 1.04 · 21.5% (48 of 223 decks)
- Nadaar, Selfless Paladin relevance 1.02 · 27.4% (61 of 223 decks)
- Cloister Gargoyle relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (38 of 223 decks)
- Precipitous Drop relevance 0.96 · 17.0% (38 of 223 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (36 of 223 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster relevance 0.95 · 19.7% (44 of 223 decks)
- Rilsa Rael, Kingpin relevance 0.94 · 23.3% (52 of 223 decks)
- Midnight Pathlighter relevance 0.93 · 26.5% (59 of 223 decks)
- Shortcut Seeker relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (32 of 223 decks)
- Triumphant Adventurer relevance 0.89 · 22.9% (51 of 223 decks)
- Acererak the Archlich relevance 0.86 · 21.5% (48 of 223 decks)
- Veteran Dungeoneer relevance 0.83 · 13.5% (30 of 223 decks)
- Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 0.80 · 16.6% (37 of 223 decks)
- Power Word Kill relevance 0.79 · 11.7% (26 of 223 decks)
- Seasoned Dungeoneer relevance 0.78 · 22.0% (49 of 223 decks)
- Planar Ally relevance 0.78 · 13.0% (29 of 223 decks)
- Undercellar Sweep relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (30 of 223 decks)
- Clattering Skeletons relevance 0.77 · 12.1% (27 of 223 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Hama Pashar, Ruin Seeker relevance 1.25 · 32.7% (73 of 223 decks)
- Barrowin of Clan Undurr relevance 1.18 · 29.6% (66 of 223 decks)
- Eccentric Apprentice relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (49 of 223 decks)
- Yuan-Ti Fang-Blade relevance 1.07 · 20.2% (45 of 223 decks)
- Yuan-Ti Malison relevance 1.05 · 25.1% (56 of 223 decks)
- Displacer Beast relevance 1.04 · 19.3% (43 of 223 decks)
- Nadaar, Selfless Paladin relevance 1.02 · 27.4% (61 of 223 decks)
- Cloister Gargoyle relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (38 of 223 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster relevance 0.95 · 19.7% (44 of 223 decks)
- Rilsa Rael, Kingpin relevance 0.94 · 23.3% (52 of 223 decks)
- Midnight Pathlighter relevance 0.93 · 26.5% (59 of 223 decks)
- Shortcut Seeker relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (32 of 223 decks)
- Triumphant Adventurer relevance 0.89 · 22.9% (51 of 223 decks)
- Acererak the Archlich relevance 0.86 · 21.5% (48 of 223 decks)
- Veteran Dungeoneer relevance 0.83 · 13.5% (30 of 223 decks)
- Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 0.80 · 16.6% (37 of 223 decks)
- Seasoned Dungeoneer relevance 0.78 · 22.0% (49 of 223 decks)
- Planar Ally relevance 0.78 · 13.0% (29 of 223 decks)
- Clattering Skeletons relevance 0.77 · 12.1% (27 of 223 decks)
- Radiant Solar relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (47 of 223 decks)
- Dungeon Crawler relevance 0.67 · 10.3% (23 of 223 decks)
- Zombie Ogre relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (24 of 223 decks)
- White Plume Adventurer relevance 0.66 · 18.4% (41 of 223 decks)
- Secret Door relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (22 of 223 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (31 of 223 decks)
- Feywild Caretaker relevance 0.56 · 10.3% (23 of 223 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Dungeon Map relevance 1.18 · 25.6% (57 of 223 decks)
- Delver's Torch relevance 1.07 · 20.2% (45 of 223 decks)
- Immovable Rod relevance 0.70 · 13.9% (31 of 223 decks)
- Dungeoneer's Pack relevance 0.67 · 11.2% (25 of 223 decks)
- Fifty Feet of Rope relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (19 of 223 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Fly relevance 1.23 · 26.9% (60 of 223 decks)
- Dungeon Delver relevance 1.07 · 27.4% (61 of 223 decks)
- Precipitous Drop relevance 0.96 · 17.0% (38 of 223 decks)
- Undercellar Sweep relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (30 of 223 decks)
- Thorough Investigation relevance 0.70 · 16.1% (36 of 223 decks)
- Minimus Containment relevance 0.55 · 9.9% (22 of 223 decks)
All instants (7)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 1.65 · 31.4% (70 of 223 decks)
- Bar the Gate relevance 1.37 · 29.6% (66 of 223 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (36 of 223 decks)
- Power Word Kill relevance 0.79 · 11.7% (26 of 223 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.70 · 13.0% (29 of 223 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (27 of 223 decks)
- Loran's Escape relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (24 of 223 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Fates' Reversal relevance 1.04 · 21.5% (48 of 223 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Dungeon Descent relevance 1.01 · 21.1% (47 of 223 decks)
- Hive of the Eye Tyrant relevance 0.88 · 13.9% (31 of 223 decks)
- Cave of the Frost Dragon relevance 0.81 · 12.6% (28 of 223 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.79 · 13.5% (30 of 223 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 45.3% (101 of 223 decks)
EDH data for You See a Guard Approach: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 223 real decks.









































