Plated Slagwurm
Played in 59 Gruul decks
230+29+1+5+2+5+
Color Identity Spread
2.7% Gruul
-
Green 1,749 · 78.7%
-
Naya 154 · 6.9%
-
Selesnya 65 · 2.9%
-
Gruul 59 · 2.7%
- Other (13) 194 · 8.7%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Pelakka Wurm 25.4% of decks
Pelakka Wurm 25.4% of decks
Impervious Greatwurm 25.4% of decks
Impervious Greatwurm 25.4% of decks
Engulfing Slagwurm 22.0% of decks
Engulfing Slagwurm 22.0% of decks
Panglacial Wurm 18.6% of decks
Panglacial Wurm 18.6% of decks
Greater Sandwurm 15.3% of decks
Greater Sandwurm 15.3% of decks
Garruk's Horde 23.7% of decks
Garruk's Horde 23.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Meet and Greet "Sisay" relevance 0.58 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 1.41 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.32 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.24 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.06 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.05 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.03 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.97 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.94 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.93 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.79 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.65 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.55 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.53 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.51 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
- Savage Ventmaw relevance 0.48 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.47 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.43 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.36 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 1.41 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.32 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.24 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.06 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.05 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.03 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.97 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.94 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.93 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.79 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.76 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.65 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.55 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.53 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.51 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
- Savage Ventmaw relevance 0.48 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.47 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.32 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.28 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.30 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Overrun relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.43 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.36 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.35 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.33 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
All lands (5)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.86 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.81 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Timber Gorge relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.42 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.37 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
EDH data for Plated Slagwurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 59 real decks.
































