Parapet
Played in 50 Bant decks
30+37+9+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
Overgrown Battlement 82.0% of decks
Overgrown Battlement 82.0% of decks
Wall of Denial 76.0% of decks
Wall of Denial 76.0% of decks
Wall of Junk 64.0% of decks
Wall of Junk 64.0% of decks
Wall of Vines 42.0% of decks
Wall of Vines 42.0% of decks
Wall of Runes 60.0% of decks
Wall of Runes 60.0% of decks
Steel Wall 50.0% of decks
Steel Wall 50.0% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.40 · 82.0% (41 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.23 · 76.0% (38 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.21 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Vines relevance 2.19 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 2.18 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Steel Wall relevance 2.16 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 2.05 · 72.0% (36 of 50 decks)
- Angelic Shield relevance 2.05 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 2.04 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 2.00 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.97 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.96 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.90 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.78 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Mulch relevance 1.78 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.78 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.78 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.75 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Crenellated Wall relevance 1.75 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.73 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.72 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.72 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.69 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.59 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.56 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.56 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Hold the Gates relevance 1.54 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.53 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Glare relevance 1.52 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 1.52 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.40 · 82.0% (41 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.23 · 76.0% (38 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.21 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Vines relevance 2.19 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 2.18 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Steel Wall relevance 2.16 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 2.05 · 72.0% (36 of 50 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 2.04 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.97 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.96 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.90 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Mulch relevance 1.78 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.78 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.75 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Crenellated Wall relevance 1.75 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.72 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.69 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.59 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.56 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.56 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.53 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Glare relevance 1.52 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 1.52 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.50 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.49 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Gleaming Barrier relevance 1.48 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.46 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.44 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 1.42 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Nets relevance 1.42 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Jungle Barrier relevance 1.41 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 1.36 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Wall of Mist relevance 1.36 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 1.30 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 1.28 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.26 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Consulate Skygate relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Angelic Shield relevance 2.05 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.78 · 58.0% (29 of 50 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.72 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Hold the Gates relevance 1.54 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 1.51 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Builder's Blessing relevance 1.46 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Leyline of Vitality relevance 1.36 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 1.35 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 1.28 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
All instants (1)
- Tower Defense relevance 2.00 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.78 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.73 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
All lands (1)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 1.35 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
EDH data for Parapet: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 50 real decks.



























