Fyndhorn Elder
Played in 153 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Arcades Sabboth relevance 1.95 · 7.1% (9 of 126 decks)
- Rubinia Soulsinger relevance 1.27 · 1.4% (9 of 636 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor relevance 0.58 · 1.2% (2 of 162 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.38 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.36 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.52 · 26.1% (40 of 153 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.21 · 64.7% (99 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.19 · 33.3% (51 of 153 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.14 · 40.5% (62 of 153 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.10 · 30.7% (47 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.10 · 50.3% (77 of 153 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.95 · 22.9% (35 of 153 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.93 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.93 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.92 · 23.5% (36 of 153 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.82 · 13.1% (20 of 153 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.81 · 17.6% (27 of 153 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.80 · 21.6% (33 of 153 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.74 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.73 · 30.1% (46 of 153 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.71 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (34 of 153 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.66 · 19.0% (29 of 153 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (33 of 153 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (31 of 153 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.59 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.56 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.52 · 26.1% (40 of 153 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.21 · 64.7% (99 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.19 · 33.3% (51 of 153 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.14 · 40.5% (62 of 153 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.10 · 30.7% (47 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.10 · 50.3% (77 of 153 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.95 · 22.9% (35 of 153 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.93 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.93 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.92 · 23.5% (36 of 153 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.82 · 13.1% (20 of 153 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.81 · 17.6% (27 of 153 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.80 · 21.6% (33 of 153 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.74 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.73 · 30.1% (46 of 153 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.71 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (34 of 153 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.66 · 19.0% (29 of 153 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (33 of 153 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (31 of 153 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.59 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.56 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.51 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.50 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.46 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.46 · 7.2% (11 of 153 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.46 · 10.5% (16 of 153 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.44 · 22.9% (35 of 153 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.43 · 22.2% (34 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.42 · 7.2% (11 of 153 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.43 · 7.2% (11 of 153 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.54 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
All instants (3)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (16 of 153 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.49 · 10.5% (16 of 153 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.45 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Regrowth relevance 0.46 · 10.5% (16 of 153 decks)
All lands (1)
- Elfhame Palace relevance 0.43 · 7.2% (11 of 153 decks)
EDH data for Fyndhorn Elder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 153 real decks.