This Is How It Ends
Played in 316 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
4.0% Dimir
-
Grixis 5,899 · 74.2%
-
Rakdos 521 · 6.6%
-
Dimir 316 · 4.0%
-
Five-Color 300 · 3.8%
-
Esper 268 · 3.4%
-
Black 266 · 3.3%
- Other (14) 381 · 4.8%
930+11+1+16+12+6+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 3.81 · 9.8% (116 of 1,188 decks)
- Atris, Oracle of Half-Truths relevance 2.18 · 5.0% (24 of 477 decks)
- The Master, Mesmerist relevance 2.17 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- The Cyber-Controller relevance 1.69 · 2.4% (21 of 861 decks)
- Rassilon, the War President relevance 1.53 · 3.6% (11 of 304 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 1.34 · 1.4% (19 of 1,365 decks)
- Doc Ock, Evil Inventor relevance 0.65 · 1.6% (3 of 187 decks)
- Tiger Shark, Abyssal Hunter relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Kotose, the Silent Spider relevance 0.31 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Vile Consumption relevance 1.68 · 28.2% (89 of 316 decks)
- Painful Quandary relevance 1.61 · 37.0% (117 of 316 decks)
- Breathstealer's Crypt relevance 1.57 · 27.2% (86 of 316 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.41 · 27.2% (86 of 316 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 1.39 · 32.3% (102 of 316 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 1.33 · 27.5% (87 of 316 decks)
- Undermine relevance 1.31 · 34.2% (108 of 316 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 1.27 · 29.1% (92 of 316 decks)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 1.21 · 26.3% (83 of 316 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 1.19 · 18.7% (59 of 316 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 1.14 · 19.9% (63 of 316 decks)
- Sadistic Shell Game relevance 1.12 · 18.0% (57 of 316 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 1.12 · 20.9% (66 of 316 decks)
- Hunted by The Family relevance 1.08 · 16.5% (52 of 316 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 1.04 · 23.4% (74 of 316 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 1.00 · 15.5% (49 of 316 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.99 · 19.9% (63 of 316 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.98 · 24.7% (78 of 316 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 0.98 · 15.5% (49 of 316 decks)
- Loyal Subordinate relevance 0.96 · 25.0% (79 of 316 decks)
- Clutch of the Undercity relevance 0.90 · 17.4% (55 of 316 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.84 · 19.6% (62 of 316 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 0.83 · 21.8% (69 of 316 decks)
- Weeping Angel relevance 0.83 · 15.8% (50 of 316 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.80 · 27.8% (88 of 316 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 0.78 · 15.5% (49 of 316 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.74 · 14.6% (46 of 316 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.73 · 18.7% (59 of 316 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (53 of 316 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (52 of 316 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 1.19 · 18.7% (59 of 316 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 1.12 · 20.9% (66 of 316 decks)
- Loyal Subordinate relevance 0.96 · 25.0% (79 of 316 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 0.83 · 21.8% (69 of 316 decks)
- Weeping Angel relevance 0.83 · 15.8% (50 of 316 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 0.67 · 12.0% (38 of 316 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.65 · 12.0% (38 of 316 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 0.64 · 11.1% (35 of 316 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 0.62 · 17.1% (54 of 316 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (42 of 316 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.58 · 39.6% (125 of 316 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.84 · 19.6% (62 of 316 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Vile Consumption relevance 1.68 · 28.2% (89 of 316 decks)
- Painful Quandary relevance 1.61 · 37.0% (117 of 316 decks)
- Breathstealer's Crypt relevance 1.57 · 27.2% (86 of 316 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.41 · 27.2% (86 of 316 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 1.39 · 32.3% (102 of 316 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 1.33 · 27.5% (87 of 316 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 1.27 · 29.1% (92 of 316 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 1.04 · 23.4% (74 of 316 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 1.00 · 15.5% (49 of 316 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.99 · 19.9% (63 of 316 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 0.98 · 15.5% (49 of 316 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 0.78 · 15.5% (49 of 316 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.69 · 14.2% (45 of 316 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.65 · 18.7% (59 of 316 decks)
- Blink relevance 0.65 · 9.5% (30 of 316 decks)
- Polluted Bonds relevance 0.62 · 11.4% (36 of 316 decks)
All instants (12)
- Undermine relevance 1.31 · 34.2% (108 of 316 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 1.14 · 19.9% (63 of 316 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.98 · 24.7% (78 of 316 decks)
- Clutch of the Undercity relevance 0.90 · 17.4% (55 of 316 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.80 · 27.8% (88 of 316 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.74 · 14.6% (46 of 316 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.73 · 18.7% (59 of 316 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (53 of 316 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (52 of 316 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.67 · 16.1% (51 of 316 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.65 · 12.0% (38 of 316 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (31 of 316 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 1.21 · 26.3% (83 of 316 decks)
- Sadistic Shell Game relevance 1.12 · 18.0% (57 of 316 decks)
- Hunted by The Family relevance 1.08 · 16.5% (52 of 316 decks)
- Manifold Insights relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (28 of 316 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.60 · 12.3% (39 of 316 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.59 · 17.4% (55 of 316 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.89 · 33.2% (105 of 316 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (45 of 316 decks)
- Zof Consumption // Zof Bloodbog relevance 0.72 · 13.6% (43 of 316 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.58 · 8.5% (27 of 316 decks)
EDH data for This Is How It Ends: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 316 real decks.



























































