Briarpack Alpha
Played in 74 Naya decks
30+39+7+1+3+
Color Identity Spread
7.0% Naya
-
Golgari 360 · 34.0%
-
Green 214 · 20.2%
-
Selesnya 182 · 17.2%
-
Gruul 164 · 15.5%
-
Naya 74 · 7.0%
- Other (12) 66 · 6.2%
Most Relevant
Nightpack Ambusher 50.0% of decks
Nightpack Ambusher 50.0% of decks
Ambush Wolf 32.4% of decks
Ambush Wolf 32.4% of decks
Flourishing Hunter 31.1% of decks
Flourishing Hunter 31.1% of decks
Ascendant Packleader 40.5% of decks
Ascendant Packleader 40.5% of decks
Runebound Wolf 33.8% of decks
Runebound Wolf 33.8% of decks
Packsong Pup 39.2% of decks
Packsong Pup 39.2% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 2.44 · 50.0% (37 of 74 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 2.16 · 32.4% (24 of 74 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 2.13 · 31.1% (23 of 74 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 2.10 · 40.5% (30 of 74 decks)
- Runebound Wolf relevance 2.03 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 1.99 · 39.2% (29 of 74 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 1.95 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 1.79 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Immerwolf relevance 1.77 · 31.1% (23 of 74 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 1.75 · 41.9% (31 of 74 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 1.67 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 1.62 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Pyreheart Wolf relevance 1.61 · 32.4% (24 of 74 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 1.59 · 39.2% (29 of 74 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.58 · 35.1% (26 of 74 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 1.54 · 37.8% (28 of 74 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 1.54 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 1.45 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.44 · 41.9% (31 of 74 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 1.43 · 35.1% (26 of 74 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 1.40 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Primal Adversary relevance 1.40 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Lone Wolf relevance 1.38 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.37 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 1.35 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Wolfir Silverheart relevance 1.32 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Mantle of the Wolf relevance 1.30 · 18.9% (14 of 74 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.29 · 37.8% (28 of 74 decks)
- Ulrich's Kindred relevance 1.26 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Bristlepack Sentry relevance 1.20 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 2.44 · 50.0% (37 of 74 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 2.16 · 32.4% (24 of 74 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 2.13 · 31.1% (23 of 74 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 2.10 · 40.5% (30 of 74 decks)
- Runebound Wolf relevance 2.03 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 1.99 · 39.2% (29 of 74 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 1.95 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 1.79 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Immerwolf relevance 1.77 · 31.1% (23 of 74 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 1.75 · 41.9% (31 of 74 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 1.62 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Pyreheart Wolf relevance 1.61 · 32.4% (24 of 74 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 1.59 · 39.2% (29 of 74 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.58 · 35.1% (26 of 74 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 1.54 · 37.8% (28 of 74 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 1.45 · 28.4% (21 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.44 · 41.9% (31 of 74 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 1.43 · 35.1% (26 of 74 decks)
- Primal Adversary relevance 1.40 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Lone Wolf relevance 1.38 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.37 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 1.35 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Wolfir Silverheart relevance 1.32 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.29 · 37.8% (28 of 74 decks)
- Ulrich's Kindred relevance 1.26 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Bristlepack Sentry relevance 1.20 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.17 · 21.6% (16 of 74 decks)
- Tundra Wolves relevance 1.09 · 16.2% (12 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.04 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.03 · 25.7% (19 of 74 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.03 · 31.1% (23 of 74 decks)
- Fearless Pup relevance 1.00 · 14.9% (11 of 74 decks)
- Summon: Fenrir relevance 0.98 · 23.0% (17 of 74 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.96 · 14.9% (11 of 74 decks)
- Wren's Run Packmaster relevance 0.90 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.90 · 23.0% (17 of 74 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.89 · 14.9% (11 of 74 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.86 · 23.0% (17 of 74 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.86 · 44.6% (33 of 74 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 1.54 · 24.3% (18 of 74 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 1.40 · 33.8% (25 of 74 decks)
- Mantle of the Wolf relevance 1.30 · 18.9% (14 of 74 decks)
- Raised by Wolves relevance 1.15 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 1.05 · 20.3% (15 of 74 decks)
- Feed the Pack relevance 1.05 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.96 · 17.6% (13 of 74 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 1.67 · 27.0% (20 of 74 decks)
All planeswalkers (3)
- Arlinn, Voice of the Pack relevance 1.18 · 18.9% (14 of 74 decks)
- Arlinn Kord // Arlinn, Embraced by the Moon relevance 0.99 · 18.9% (14 of 74 decks)
- Arlinn, the Pack's Hope // Arlinn, the Moon's Fury relevance 0.95 · 16.2% (12 of 74 decks)
EDH data for Briarpack Alpha: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 74 real decks.

























