Sugar Rush
Played in 219 Rakdos decks
530+7+2+28+10+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
7.7% Rakdos
Commanders
Zuko, Seeking Honor 3.3% of decks
Zuko, Seeking Honor 3.3% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar 1.7% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar 1.7% of decks
Cultist of the Absolute // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat 6.3% of decks
Cultist of the Absolute // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat 6.3% of decks
Scarlet Spider, Kaine 3.8% of decks
Scarlet Spider, Kaine 3.8% of decks
Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron 2.3% of decks
Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron 2.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Bladebrand 26.5% of decks
Bladebrand 26.5% of decks
Might of the Meek 21.0% of decks
Might of the Meek 21.0% of decks
Fists of Flame 20.5% of decks
Fists of Flame 20.5% of decks
Expedite 23.3% of decks
Expedite 23.3% of decks
Haste Magic 17.4% of decks
Haste Magic 17.4% of decks
Crash Through 19.2% of decks
Crash Through 19.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Zuko, Seeking Honor relevance 0.76 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.63 · 1.7% (2 of 116 decks)
- Cultist of the Absolute // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.56 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Scarlet Spider, Kaine relevance 0.50 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.43 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bladebrand relevance 1.34 · 26.5% (58 of 219 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 1.18 · 21.0% (46 of 219 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 1.10 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.92 · 17.4% (38 of 219 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (42 of 219 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.83 · 30.6% (67 of 219 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.81 · 31.5% (69 of 219 decks)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.72 · 12.8% (28 of 219 decks)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (26 of 219 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.65 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.64 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Black Waltz No. 3 relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (53 of 219 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.62 · 25.6% (56 of 219 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
- Nighthaze relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (21 of 219 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (26 of 219 decks)
- Queen Brahne relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (42 of 219 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.57 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.57 · 8.2% (18 of 219 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.56 · 10.5% (23 of 219 decks)
- Risky Shortcut relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (32 of 219 decks)
- Accelerate relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (18 of 219 decks)
- Warlord's Fury relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (22 of 219 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.53 · 8.2% (18 of 219 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Black Waltz No. 3 relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (53 of 219 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.62 · 25.6% (56 of 219 decks)
- Queen Brahne relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (42 of 219 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 0.51 · 21.0% (46 of 219 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.47 · 16.9% (37 of 219 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (17 of 219 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.81 · 31.5% (69 of 219 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
All instants (28)
- Bladebrand relevance 1.34 · 26.5% (58 of 219 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 1.18 · 21.0% (46 of 219 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 1.10 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.92 · 17.4% (38 of 219 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (26 of 219 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.65 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.57 · 20.5% (45 of 219 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.57 · 8.2% (18 of 219 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.56 · 10.5% (23 of 219 decks)
- Accelerate relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (18 of 219 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.53 · 8.2% (18 of 219 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.53 · 14.2% (31 of 219 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.53 · 28.8% (63 of 219 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (32 of 219 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (20 of 219 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.51 · 15.1% (33 of 219 decks)
- Mirrodin Avenged relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (21 of 219 decks)
- Infuriate relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (17 of 219 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.48 · 14.2% (31 of 219 decks)
- Maximum Overdrive relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (20 of 219 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (20 of 219 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.45 · 28.8% (63 of 219 decks)
- Vincent's Limit Break relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (21 of 219 decks)
- Thunder Magic relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (23 of 219 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Crash Through relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (42 of 219 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.83 · 30.6% (67 of 219 decks)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.72 · 12.8% (28 of 219 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.64 · 23.3% (51 of 219 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (27 of 219 decks)
- Nighthaze relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (21 of 219 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (26 of 219 decks)
- Risky Shortcut relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (32 of 219 decks)
- Warlord's Fury relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (22 of 219 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (22 of 219 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.50 · 18.7% (41 of 219 decks)
All lands (2)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.61 · 33.8% (74 of 219 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.44 · 25.1% (55 of 219 decks)
EDH data for Sugar Rush: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 219 real decks.






































