Iridescent Blademaster
Played in 61 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
15.3% Green
All commanders (5)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.03 · 1.6% (3 of 185 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.81 · 1.5% (2 of 131 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.71 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Jugan, the Rising Star relevance 0.62 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.52 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Beast-Kin Ranger relevance 2.08 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.78 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Serpent-Blade Assailant relevance 1.63 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 1.62 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.47 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Elderleaf Mentor relevance 1.38 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.37 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 1.28 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Lothlórien Lookout relevance 1.21 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 1.19 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Lys Alana Informant relevance 1.17 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 1.14 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 1.13 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Safewright Cavalry relevance 1.13 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Tajuru Pathwarden relevance 1.12 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Sentinel Spider relevance 1.11 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Llanowar Empath relevance 1.06 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Dawnhart Rejuvenator relevance 1.05 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.99 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.98 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.97 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.96 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Canopy Baloth relevance 0.95 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.93 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.89 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Snapping Gnarlid relevance 0.89 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.86 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.85 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Beast-Kin Ranger relevance 2.08 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.78 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Serpent-Blade Assailant relevance 1.63 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 1.62 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.47 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Elderleaf Mentor relevance 1.38 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Lothlórien Lookout relevance 1.21 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Lys Alana Informant relevance 1.17 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 1.14 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Safewright Cavalry relevance 1.13 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Tajuru Pathwarden relevance 1.12 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Sentinel Spider relevance 1.11 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Llanowar Empath relevance 1.06 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Dawnhart Rejuvenator relevance 1.05 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.98 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.96 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Canopy Baloth relevance 0.95 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.89 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Snapping Gnarlid relevance 0.89 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.83 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.83 · 45.9% (28 of 61 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.82 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.81 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.80 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.78 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.78 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.77 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.72 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.71 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.71 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Treeshaker Chimera relevance 0.68 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.65 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.64 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Citanul Stalwart relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.97 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.85 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.79 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
All instants (6)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.37 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 1.28 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 1.19 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 1.13 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.86 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.76 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Overcome relevance 0.99 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.93 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Storm the Seedcore relevance 0.72 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.68 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
EDH data for Iridescent Blademaster: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 61 real decks.