Into the Maw of Hell
Played in 70 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
5.6% Izzet
All commanders (1)
- Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.48 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Stone Rain relevance 0.92 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Echo Mage relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Explosive Welcome relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Arcane Melee relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.81 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Bloodwater Entity relevance 0.80 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Disaster Radius relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Volcanic Awakening relevance 0.74 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Spectacle Mage relevance 0.72 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 0.72 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Blast of Genius relevance 0.67 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Increasing Vengeance relevance 0.63 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.63 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.62 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.59 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Repeated Reverberation relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Rowan, Scholar of Sparks // Will, Scholar of Frost relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.57 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Alania, Divergent Storm relevance 0.56 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Splatter Technique relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Echo Mage relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Bloodwater Entity relevance 0.80 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Spectacle Mage relevance 0.72 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.57 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Alania, Divergent Storm relevance 0.56 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Ovika, Enigma Goliath relevance 0.50 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Melek, Izzet Paragon relevance 0.49 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Solphim, Mayhem Dominus relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.46 · 32.9% (23 of 70 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Pyromancer's Goggles relevance 0.53 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Arcane Melee relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.81 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Rite of the Dragoncaller relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.47 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
All instants (10)
- Explosive Welcome relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Increasing Vengeance relevance 0.63 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.63 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.62 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.59 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Repeated Reverberation relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Practical Research relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Counterflux relevance 0.52 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Reverberate relevance 0.46 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Stone Rain relevance 0.92 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Disaster Radius relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Volcanic Awakening relevance 0.74 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 0.72 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Blast of Genius relevance 0.67 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Splatter Technique relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Soulfire Eruption relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Fireball relevance 0.52 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Rowan, Scholar of Sparks // Will, Scholar of Frost relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Spectacle Summit relevance 0.56 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
All lands (2)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.77 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
EDH data for Into the Maw of Hell: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 70 real decks.