Conifer Strider
Played in 55 Green decks
430+19+3+8+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
7.3% Green
Commanders
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger 3.0% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger 3.0% of decks
Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut 2.9% of decks
Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut 2.9% of decks
Surrak, the Hunt Caller 1.7% of decks
Surrak, the Hunt Caller 1.7% of decks
Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef 1.5% of decks
Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef 1.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Stampeding Elk Herd 18.2% of decks
Stampeding Elk Herd 18.2% of decks
Plummet 21.8% of decks
Plummet 21.8% of decks
Silverback Shaman 14.5% of decks
Silverback Shaman 14.5% of decks
Naturalize 29.1% of decks
Naturalize 29.1% of decks
Greater Sandwurm 16.4% of decks
Greater Sandwurm 16.4% of decks
Colossal Dreadmaw 16.4% of decks
Colossal Dreadmaw 16.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.62 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.61 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.54 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef relevance 0.52 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Stampeding Elk Herd relevance 1.22 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Plummet relevance 1.13 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Silverback Shaman relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.89 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.79 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.77 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.75 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.74 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.73 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.66 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.64 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 0.63 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.63 · 27.3% (15 of 55 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.62 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.62 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.58 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.54 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.49 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.48 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.46 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.45 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.43 · 25.5% (14 of 55 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.43 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Stampeding Elk Herd relevance 1.22 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Silverback Shaman relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.79 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.77 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 0.63 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.62 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.62 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.58 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.48 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.46 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.45 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.43 · 25.5% (14 of 55 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.43 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.64 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.63 · 27.3% (15 of 55 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.37 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
All instants (8)
- Plummet relevance 1.13 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.89 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.75 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.66 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.54 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.49 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.38 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.74 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.73 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.39 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.31 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.34 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
EDH data for Conifer Strider: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 55 real decks.































