Pain Magnification
Played in 148 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Jund
- Rakdos 2,344 · 65.3%
- Grixis 901 · 25.1%
- Jund 148 · 4.1%
- Mardu 111 · 3.1%
- Other (6) 86 · 2.4%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Winter, Misanthropic Guide relevance 1.82 · 1.0% (37 of 3,606 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.09 · 1.4% (6 of 415 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.43 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Painful Quandary relevance 1.34 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Waste Not relevance 1.04 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.94 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger relevance 0.89 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.88 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Entropic Battlecruiser relevance 0.87 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Spiteful Visions relevance 0.87 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.82 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Bandit's Talent relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.78 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Fell Specter relevance 0.78 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Syphon Mind relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.76 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.76 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Oppression relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Rankle, Master of Pranks relevance 0.74 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 0.72 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.72 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Cunning Lethemancer relevance 0.71 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.71 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.69 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.69 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Zurzoth, Chaos Rider relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Bottomless Pit relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.65 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.64 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger relevance 0.89 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.78 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Fell Specter relevance 0.78 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Rankle, Master of Pranks relevance 0.74 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 0.72 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Cunning Lethemancer relevance 0.71 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.71 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.69 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Zurzoth, Chaos Rider relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.65 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.64 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.63 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- The Lord of Pain relevance 0.61 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Sangromancer relevance 0.59 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal // Temple of the Dead relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Razorkin Needlehead relevance 0.57 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Florian, Voldaren Scion relevance 0.55 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.54 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Tinybones, Bauble Burglar relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Entropic Battlecruiser relevance 0.87 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
All enchantments (18)
- Painful Quandary relevance 1.34 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Waste Not relevance 1.04 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.94 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.88 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Spiteful Visions relevance 0.87 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.82 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Bandit's Talent relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.76 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.76 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Oppression relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.72 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Bottomless Pit relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Raiders' Wake relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 0.54 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 0.54 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 0.54 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
All instants (2)
- Drag to the Roots relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.54 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Syphon Mind relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.69 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
EDH data for Pain Magnification: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 148 real decks.