Laquatus's Disdain
Played in 109 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
109 decks
- Azorius 49 · 45.0%
- Blue 27 · 24.8%
- Dimir 9 · 8.3%
- Sultai 8 · 7.3%
- Esper 4 · 3.7%
- Simic 4 · 3.7%
- Other (6) 8 · 7.3%
All commanders (3)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 1.64 · 3.6% (4 of 111 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.93 · 1.4% (2 of 141 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.90 · 1.3% (2 of 160 decks)
All parallel cards (30)
- Grip of Amnesia
- Squelch
- Confound
- Remand
- Keep Safe
- Exclude
- Bone to Ash
- Disrupt
- Runeboggle
- Think Twice
- Dismiss
- Cremate
- Halt Order
- Rakshasa's Disdain
- Countervailing Winds
- Glimpse of Freedom
- Dream Fracture
- Bind
- Contradict
- Interdict
- Hindering Light
- Scatter Arc
- Radical Idea
- Learn from the Past
- Plunder the Trollshaws
- Soul Read
- Oona's Grace
- Clear the Mind
- Prologue to Phyresis
- Refocus
All most relevant (30)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 4.08 · 48.6% (53 of 109 decks)
- Interdict relevance 3.51 · 38.5% (42 of 109 decks)
- Halt Order relevance 3.33 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Force Void relevance 3.22 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Confound relevance 3.08 · 44.0% (48 of 109 decks)
- Contradict relevance 3.02 · 35.8% (39 of 109 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 3.01 · 33.9% (37 of 109 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 2.95 · 49.5% (54 of 109 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.91 · 40.4% (44 of 109 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 2.89 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Jaded Response relevance 2.75 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Frantic Inventory relevance 2.74 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 2.73 · 27.5% (30 of 109 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.73 · 40.4% (44 of 109 decks)
- Leave in the Dust relevance 2.72 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Hydrolash relevance 2.69 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Lunar Rejection relevance 2.68 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.66 · 39.4% (43 of 109 decks)
- Laquatus's Creativity relevance 2.61 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Liquify relevance 2.60 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Squelch relevance 2.59 · 28.4% (31 of 109 decks)
- Inaction Injunction relevance 2.57 · 30.3% (33 of 109 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 2.57 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 2.56 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Foreshadow relevance 2.55 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.53 · 33.9% (37 of 109 decks)
- Illuminated Wings relevance 2.51 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Fold into Aether relevance 2.50 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Kingfisher relevance 2.50 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.50 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 2.73 · 27.5% (30 of 109 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 2.56 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Kingfisher relevance 2.50 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 2.38 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 2.36 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Illuminated Wings relevance 2.51 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Lashknife Barrier relevance 2.41 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Customs Depot relevance 2.38 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
All instants (36)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 4.08 · 48.6% (53 of 109 decks)
- Interdict relevance 3.51 · 38.5% (42 of 109 decks)
- Halt Order relevance 3.33 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Force Void relevance 3.22 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Confound relevance 3.08 · 44.0% (48 of 109 decks)
- Contradict relevance 3.02 · 35.8% (39 of 109 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 3.01 · 33.9% (37 of 109 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 2.95 · 49.5% (54 of 109 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.91 · 40.4% (44 of 109 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 2.89 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Jaded Response relevance 2.75 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Frantic Inventory relevance 2.74 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.73 · 40.4% (44 of 109 decks)
- Leave in the Dust relevance 2.72 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Hydrolash relevance 2.69 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Lunar Rejection relevance 2.68 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.66 · 39.4% (43 of 109 decks)
- Liquify relevance 2.60 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Squelch relevance 2.59 · 28.4% (31 of 109 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 2.57 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Foreshadow relevance 2.55 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.53 · 33.9% (37 of 109 decks)
- Fold into Aether relevance 2.50 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.50 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Lay Bare relevance 2.49 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Outwit relevance 2.48 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Runeboggle relevance 2.45 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Festival of the Guildpact relevance 2.45 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Bewilder relevance 2.45 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Gallantry relevance 2.44 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Glimpse of Freedom relevance 2.44 · 28.4% (31 of 109 decks)
- Grip of the Roil relevance 2.42 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Everdream relevance 2.39 · 28.4% (31 of 109 decks)
- Spell Contortion relevance 2.37 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.36 · 37.6% (41 of 109 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.34 · 33.0% (36 of 109 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Laquatus's Creativity relevance 2.61 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Inaction Injunction relevance 2.57 · 30.3% (33 of 109 decks)
- Huddle Up relevance 2.49 · 27.5% (30 of 109 decks)
- Johann's Stopgap relevance 2.45 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- False Dawn relevance 2.39 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Touch of Invisibility relevance 2.38 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
EDH data for Laquatus's Disdain: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 109 real decks.