Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.80 · 75.0% (120 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.87 · 64.4% (103 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.74 · 73.8% (118 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.82 · 62.5% (100 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 0.86 · 56.3% (90 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.84 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.68 · 75.6% (121 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 0.84 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.70 · 71.3% (114 of 160 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.73 · 65.6% (105 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.75 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.63 · 74.4% (119 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 0.83 · 40.6% (65 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 0.84 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Vandal relevance 0.79 · 42.5% (68 of 160 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.55 · 75.0% (120 of 160 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.59 · 60.6% (97 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.59 · 58.1% (93 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.66 · 46.9% (75 of 160 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.68 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.64 · 46.3% (74 of 160 decks)
- Psychic Pickpocket relevance 0.75 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.63 · 39.4% (63 of 160 decks)
- Backstreet Bruiser relevance 0.73 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.57 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.54 · 44.4% (71 of 160 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.59 · 34.4% (55 of 160 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.56 · 35.6% (57 of 160 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.56 · 35.0% (56 of 160 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 34.4% (55 of 160 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (46 of 160 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.59 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.57 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.56 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.52 · 29.4% (47 of 160 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.40 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.38 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.39 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.51 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Deluge relevance 0.52 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.41 · 45.6% (73 of 160 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Riptide Replicator relevance 0.60 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
- Think Tank relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.45 · 28.1% (45 of 160 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (16 of 160 decks)
Card Stacks
11
Card Stacks
11Showing 1-2 of 11
Cards like Cephalid Looter
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cephalid Looter 75%
- Cephalid Broker 74%
- Merfolk Looter 1%
Other options: Krovikan Sorcerer, Thought Courier, Strix Lookout, Reckless Scholar, Bonded Fetch, Enclave Cryptologist, Captain of Umbar, Soothsayer Adept, Research Assistant, Erratic Visionary, Selhoff Entomber, Facet Reader, Pilfering Hawk, Seeker of Insight, Frontline Sage, Magus of the Bazaar, Furtive Analyst, Teferi's Protege, Harrier Strix, Dragonborn Looter
Cards like Theft of Dreams
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cephalid Illusionist
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Verity Circle
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Verity Circle 75%
- Betrayal 39%
Cards like Archetype of Imagination
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Crown of Ascension, Flight, Phantom Wings, Arcanum Wings, Buoyancy
Cards like Metallic Mimic
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Deluge
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Deluge 23%
- Blustersquall 15%
Cards like Caged Sun
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Hall of Triumph
Cards like Reflections of Littjara
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 36%
- Rapid Hybridization 35%
Cards like Maskwood Nexus
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.80 · 75.0% (120 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.87 · 64.4% (103 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.74 · 73.8% (118 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.82 · 62.5% (100 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 0.86 · 56.3% (90 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.84 · 55.0% (88 of 160 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.68 · 75.6% (121 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 0.84 · 54.4% (87 of 160 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.70 · 71.3% (114 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.75 · 58.8% (94 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.63 · 74.4% (119 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 0.83 · 40.6% (65 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 0.84 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Vandal relevance 0.79 · 42.5% (68 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.59 · 58.1% (93 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.66 · 46.9% (75 of 160 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.64 · 46.3% (74 of 160 decks)
- Psychic Pickpocket relevance 0.75 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Backstreet Bruiser relevance 0.73 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.54 · 44.4% (71 of 160 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.56 · 35.6% (57 of 160 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 34.4% (55 of 160 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (46 of 160 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.59 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.57 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.56 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.52 · 29.4% (47 of 160 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.40 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.38 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.39 · 53.1% (85 of 160 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.51 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Keen Buccaneer relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (16 of 160 decks)
- Giant Octopus relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.39 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.38 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (15 of 160 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.38 · 9.4% (15 of 160 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (22 of 160 decks)
- Illithid Harvester // Plant Tadpoles relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.29 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Godhunter Octopus relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.59 · 34.4% (55 of 160 decks)
- Riptide Replicator relevance 0.60 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.35 · 44.4% (71 of 160 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.41 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.39 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Storage Matrix relevance 0.40 · 11.9% (19 of 160 decks)
- Birthing Boughs relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.38 · 9.4% (15 of 160 decks)
- Shuko relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.28 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Charmed Pendant relevance 0.42 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Mirror of Fate relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.23 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (15 of 160 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.19 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Doom Cannon relevance 0.38 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.20 · 21.3% (34 of 160 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Eye of Ramos relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.18 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Mirari relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Icy Manipulator relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Progenitor's Icon relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Mindlink Mech relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.55 · 75.0% (120 of 160 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.68 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.63 · 39.4% (63 of 160 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.57 · 41.9% (67 of 160 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.56 · 35.0% (56 of 160 decks)
- Think Tank relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Immobilizing Ink relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.43 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.41 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Flood relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Stupefying Touch relevance 0.49 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.36 · 24.4% (39 of 160 decks)
- Mystic Decree relevance 0.48 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Persuasion relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.39 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Time of Ice relevance 0.40 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Faces of the Past relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Xenograft relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Dragon Wings relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Pedantic Learning relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (26 of 160 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.21 · 21.3% (34 of 160 decks)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 37.5% (60 of 160 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Alexi's Cloak relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Deluge relevance 0.52 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.41 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (28 of 160 decks)
- Ensnare relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.18 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Cunning Wish relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.19 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Siren's Call relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Psychic Trance relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.11 · 62.5% (100 of 160 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (22 of 160 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Scent of Brine relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 35.0% (56 of 160 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 36.3% (58 of 160 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.12 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.11 · 28.7% (46 of 160 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.11 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.13 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Read the Runes relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.73 · 65.6% (105 of 160 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.59 · 60.6% (97 of 160 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.41 · 45.6% (73 of 160 decks)
- Churning Eddy relevance 0.51 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.33 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Touch of Invisibility relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.35 · 11.9% (19 of 160 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.26 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (15 of 160 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.25 · 11.9% (19 of 160 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Mana Vapors relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Quiet Speculation relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Misstep relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (16 of 160 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.13 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.13 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All planeswalkers (3)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.45 · 28.1% (45 of 160 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.15 · 10.6% (17 of 160 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
Utility Lands
45
Utility Lands
45 Showing 1-10 of 45
Page size
All utility lands (45)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.36 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.27 · 43.8% (70 of 160 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.32 · 21.3% (34 of 160 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.22 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (37 of 160 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (20 of 160 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.18 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (12 of 160 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (8 of 160 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.13 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (10 of 160 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 48.8% (78 of 160 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 51.2% (82 of 160 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
Lands
18
Lands
18 Showing 1-10 of 18
Page size
All lands (18)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.30 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 30.0% (48 of 160 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (18 of 160 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (14 of 160 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (13 of 160 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 6.9% (11 of 160 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 160 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 160 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 87.5% (140 of 160 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor, from 160 real Commander decks.