Cephalid Retainer
Played in 280 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
280 decks
-
Blue 156 · 55.7%
-
Azorius 63 · 22.5%
-
Simic 22 · 7.9%
-
Esper 12 · 4.3%
-
Dimir 10 · 3.6%
- Other (7) 17 · 6.1%
830+2833+2+7+3+4+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.73 · 63.6% (103 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.42 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.78 · 1.7% (3 of 173 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.75 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.56 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.52 · 1.0% (2 of 198 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.41 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (28)
- Merfolk Seastalkers
- Dromoka Dunecaster
- Air Servant
- Blinding Drone
- Niblis of the Breath
- Frostbridge Guard
- Flood
- Mothrider Patrol
- Elite Arrester
- Silkbind Faerie
- Gavony Trapper
- Fan Bearer
- Squall Drifter
- Celestial Enforcer
- Checkpoint Officer
- Blinding Mage
- Stonybrook Angler
- Akroan Jailer
- Sterling Keykeeper
- Coeurl
- Nebelgast Beguiler
- Rathi Trapper
- Puppeteer
- Dreamshackle Geist
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor
- Aysen Bureaucrats
- Benalish Trapper
- Master Decoy
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 5.31 · 62.9% (176 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 5.17 · 56.1% (157 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 5.01 · 62.1% (174 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 4.87 · 50.7% (142 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 4.86 · 48.9% (137 of 280 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 4.49 · 57.1% (160 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 4.10 · 57.5% (161 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 3.95 · 39.3% (110 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 3.94 · 50.0% (140 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.90 · 48.6% (136 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 3.89 · 36.8% (103 of 280 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.88 · 50.7% (142 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Vandal relevance 3.55 · 40.4% (113 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 3.52 · 45.0% (126 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 3.14 · 49.3% (138 of 280 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.85 · 37.1% (104 of 280 decks)
- Backstreet Bruiser relevance 2.75 · 27.9% (78 of 280 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.62 · 40.7% (114 of 280 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 2.57 · 29.6% (83 of 280 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.55 · 36.8% (103 of 280 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.46 · 36.4% (102 of 280 decks)
- Psychic Pickpocket relevance 2.44 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 2.32 · 32.5% (91 of 280 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 2.31 · 40.0% (112 of 280 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.30 · 31.8% (89 of 280 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 2.17 · 29.3% (82 of 280 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 2.14 · 36.4% (102 of 280 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.10 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 2.06 · 31.4% (88 of 280 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 2.02 · 27.9% (78 of 280 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 5.31 · 62.9% (176 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 5.17 · 56.1% (157 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 5.01 · 62.1% (174 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 4.87 · 50.7% (142 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 4.86 · 48.9% (137 of 280 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 4.49 · 57.1% (160 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 4.10 · 57.5% (161 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 3.95 · 39.3% (110 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 3.94 · 50.0% (140 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.90 · 48.6% (136 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 3.89 · 36.8% (103 of 280 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.88 · 50.7% (142 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Vandal relevance 3.55 · 40.4% (113 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 3.52 · 45.0% (126 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 3.14 · 49.3% (138 of 280 decks)
- Backstreet Bruiser relevance 2.75 · 27.9% (78 of 280 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 2.57 · 29.6% (83 of 280 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.55 · 36.8% (103 of 280 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.46 · 36.4% (102 of 280 decks)
- Psychic Pickpocket relevance 2.44 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 2.32 · 32.5% (91 of 280 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 2.14 · 36.4% (102 of 280 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.10 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 2.06 · 31.4% (88 of 280 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.97 · 25.4% (71 of 280 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.77 · 35.7% (100 of 280 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.72 · 28.9% (81 of 280 decks)
- Giant Octopus relevance 1.70 · 17.1% (48 of 280 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.61 · 25.0% (70 of 280 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.55 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.55 · 18.2% (51 of 280 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.54 · 20.7% (58 of 280 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.53 · 24.6% (69 of 280 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.61 · 26.4% (74 of 280 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 1.61 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.85 · 37.1% (104 of 280 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 2.31 · 40.0% (112 of 280 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 2.17 · 29.3% (82 of 280 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 2.02 · 27.9% (78 of 280 decks)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 1.62 · 15.0% (42 of 280 decks)
- Flood relevance 1.58 · 17.9% (50 of 280 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.54 · 23.2% (65 of 280 decks)
All instants (3)
- High Tide relevance 1.77 · 42.9% (120 of 280 decks)
- Deluge relevance 1.56 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 1.55 · 24.6% (69 of 280 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.62 · 40.7% (114 of 280 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.30 · 31.8% (89 of 280 decks)
- Churning Eddy relevance 1.90 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.85 · 35.4% (99 of 280 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 1.57 · 37.9% (106 of 280 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Retainer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 280 real decks.





































































