Cephalid Broker

Played in 1,888 decks

Cephalid Broker
$0.18 €0.04

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 4.94 · 73.8% (118 of 160 decks)
  2. Ian Malcolm, Chaotician relevance 4.45 · 9.9% (248 of 2,494 decks)
  3. Brallin, Skyshark Rider // Shabraz, the Skyshark relevance 2.44 · 1.1% (19 of 1,804 decks)
  4. Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 2.36 · 1.8% (26 of 1,450 decks)
  5. Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 2.34 · 3.8% (121 of 3,174 decks)
  6. Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 2.19 · 2.2% (35 of 1,571 decks)
  7. Runo Stromkirk // Krothuss, Lord of the Deep relevance 2.11 · 1.6% (46 of 2,953 decks)
  8. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.09 · 1.2% (72 of 5,963 decks)
  9. Rex, Cyber-Hound relevance 2.04 · 2.8% (23 of 811 decks)
  10. Toluz, Clever Conductor relevance 2.02 · 1.8% (17 of 968 decks)
  11. Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.53 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
  12. Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 1.39 · 3.5% (18 of 515 decks)
  13. Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 1.15 · 2.1% (19 of 921 decks)
  14. Gwendlyn Di Corci relevance 1.07 · 2.1% (4 of 193 decks)
  15. Susan Foreman // The First Doctor relevance 1.00 · 1.8% (3 of 164 decks)
  16. The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.98 · 1.2% (25 of 2,056 decks)
  17. Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.97 · 3.3% (7 of 209 decks)
  18. Red Ghost, Intangible Genius relevance 0.96 · 3.2% (4 of 125 decks)
  19. Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.93 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
  20. Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.80 · 6.4% (3 of 47 decks)
  21. Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.80 · 1.0% (17 of 1,638 decks)
  22. Elrond, Moon-Reader relevance 0.77 · 1.9% (7 of 373 decks)
  23. Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
  24. The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.72 · 1.9% (6 of 314 decks)
  25. Nebuchadnezzar relevance 0.70 · 1.2% (3 of 249 decks)
  26. Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.69 · 1.2% (9 of 743 decks)
  27. The Squadron Sinister relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
  28. Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.65 · 2.1% (2 of 94 decks)
  29. The Tenth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.63 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
  30. Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.63 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)

Parallel Cards

18

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Cephalid Looter
    2.72 32.2%
    $0.10 €0.12
  • Merfolk Looter
    1.34 23.2%
    $0.39 €0.13
  • Lore Broker
    1.33 18.9%
    $0.43 €0.43
  • Reckless Scholar
    1.11 14.2%
    $0.12 €0.07
  • Vision Skeins
    1.08 18.8%
    $0.75 €0.35
  • Cephalid Sage
    1.08 11.2%
    $0.16 €0.10
  • Thought Courier
    1.04 15.2%
    $0.30 €0.26
  • Dictate of Kruphix
    1.02 20.9%
    $0.40 €0.44
  • Bonded Fetch
    0.98 12.6%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Howling Mine
    0.97 23.6%
    $5.49 €3.00
All most relevant (30)
  1. Cephalid Looter relevance 2.72 · 32.2% (608 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Merfolk Looter relevance 1.34 · 23.2% (438 of 1,888 decks)
  3. Lore Broker relevance 1.33 · 18.9% (357 of 1,888 decks)
  4. Reckless Scholar relevance 1.11 · 14.2% (269 of 1,888 decks)
  5. Vision Skeins relevance 1.08 · 18.8% (355 of 1,888 decks)
  6. Cephalid Sage relevance 1.08 · 11.2% (212 of 1,888 decks)
  7. Thought Courier relevance 1.04 · 15.2% (287 of 1,888 decks)
  8. Dictate of Kruphix relevance 1.02 · 20.9% (395 of 1,888 decks)
  9. Bonded Fetch relevance 0.98 · 12.6% (238 of 1,888 decks)
  10. Howling Mine relevance 0.97 · 23.6% (445 of 1,888 decks)
  11. Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.92 · 16.9% (319 of 1,888 decks)
  12. Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.91 · 9.1% (172 of 1,888 decks)
  13. Dakra Mystic relevance 0.91 · 12.7% (239 of 1,888 decks)
  14. Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.90 · 18.3% (345 of 1,888 decks)
  15. Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.89 · 9.7% (183 of 1,888 decks)
  16. Chasm Skulker relevance 0.89 · 22.2% (419 of 1,888 decks)
  17. Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.88 · 24.0% (454 of 1,888 decks)
  18. Cephalid Scout relevance 0.87 · 8.8% (166 of 1,888 decks)
  19. Fevered Visions relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (275 of 1,888 decks)
  20. Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.84 · 10.7% (202 of 1,888 decks)
  21. Windfall relevance 0.84 · 27.6% (522 of 1,888 decks)
  22. Jace's Archivist relevance 0.83 · 16.9% (320 of 1,888 decks)
  23. Forced Fruition relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (302 of 1,888 decks)
  24. Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.81 · 10.3% (195 of 1,888 decks)
  25. Callous Oppressor relevance 0.80 · 10.2% (193 of 1,888 decks)
  26. Noggle Ransacker relevance 0.80 · 9.6% (181 of 1,888 decks)
  27. Ominous Seas relevance 0.80 · 16.9% (319 of 1,888 decks)
  28. Cephalid Constable relevance 0.79 · 11.1% (210 of 1,888 decks)
  29. Frantic Search relevance 0.78 · 29.8% (563 of 1,888 decks)
  30. Dream Fracture relevance 0.74 · 12.6% (237 of 1,888 decks)

Creatures

31

Showing 1-10 of 31

Page size
  • Cephalid Looter
    2.72 32.2%
    $0.10 €0.12
  • Merfolk Looter
    1.34 23.2%
    $0.39 €0.13
  • Lore Broker
    1.33 18.9%
    $0.43 €0.43
  • Reckless Scholar
    1.11 14.2%
    $0.12 €0.07
  • Cephalid Sage
    1.08 11.2%
    $0.16 €0.10
  • Thought Courier
    1.04 15.2%
    $0.30 €0.26
  • Bonded Fetch
    0.98 12.6%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Arcanis the Omnipotent
    0.92 16.9%
    $0.28
  • Cephalid Retainer
    0.91 9.1%
    $0.23 €0.24
  • Dakra Mystic
    0.91 12.7%
    $0.22 €0.27
All creatures (31)
  1. Cephalid Looter relevance 2.72 · 32.2% (608 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Merfolk Looter relevance 1.34 · 23.2% (438 of 1,888 decks)
  3. Lore Broker relevance 1.33 · 18.9% (357 of 1,888 decks)
  4. Reckless Scholar relevance 1.11 · 14.2% (269 of 1,888 decks)
  5. Cephalid Sage relevance 1.08 · 11.2% (212 of 1,888 decks)
  6. Thought Courier relevance 1.04 · 15.2% (287 of 1,888 decks)
  7. Bonded Fetch relevance 0.98 · 12.6% (238 of 1,888 decks)
  8. Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.92 · 16.9% (319 of 1,888 decks)
  9. Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.91 · 9.1% (172 of 1,888 decks)
  10. Dakra Mystic relevance 0.91 · 12.7% (239 of 1,888 decks)
  11. Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.90 · 18.3% (345 of 1,888 decks)
  12. Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.89 · 9.7% (183 of 1,888 decks)
  13. Chasm Skulker relevance 0.89 · 22.2% (419 of 1,888 decks)
  14. Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.88 · 24.0% (454 of 1,888 decks)
  15. Cephalid Scout relevance 0.87 · 8.8% (166 of 1,888 decks)
  16. Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.84 · 10.7% (202 of 1,888 decks)
  17. Jace's Archivist relevance 0.83 · 16.9% (320 of 1,888 decks)
  18. Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.81 · 10.3% (195 of 1,888 decks)
  19. Callous Oppressor relevance 0.80 · 10.2% (193 of 1,888 decks)
  20. Noggle Ransacker relevance 0.80 · 9.6% (181 of 1,888 decks)
  21. Cephalid Constable relevance 0.79 · 11.1% (210 of 1,888 decks)
  22. Homunculus Horde relevance 0.73 · 14.9% (281 of 1,888 decks)
  23. Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.73 · 9.5% (180 of 1,888 decks)
  24. Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.73 · 9.1% (171 of 1,888 decks)
  25. Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.67 · 10.6% (200 of 1,888 decks)
  26. Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 0.67 · 6.7% (126 of 1,888 decks)
  27. Cephalid Vandal relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (143 of 1,888 decks)
  28. Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.66 · 14.2% (269 of 1,888 decks)
  29. Wonder relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (301 of 1,888 decks)
  30. Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (315 of 1,888 decks)
  31. Red Death, Shipwrecker relevance 0.64 · 10.1% (191 of 1,888 decks)

Artifacts

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Howling Mine
    0.97 23.6%
    $5.49 €3.00
  • Temple Bell
    0.72 14.7%
    $6.69 €4.69
All artifacts (2)
  1. Howling Mine relevance 0.97 · 23.6% (445 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Temple Bell relevance 0.72 · 14.7% (277 of 1,888 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Dictate of Kruphix
    1.02 20.9%
    $0.40 €0.44
  • Fevered Visions
    0.85 14.6%
    $1.14 €0.81
  • Forced Fruition
    0.83 16.0%
    $9.92 €2.05
  • Ominous Seas
    0.80 16.9%
    $1.66 €1.56
All enchantments (4)
  1. Dictate of Kruphix relevance 1.02 · 20.9% (395 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Fevered Visions relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (275 of 1,888 decks)
  3. Forced Fruition relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (302 of 1,888 decks)
  4. Ominous Seas relevance 0.80 · 16.9% (319 of 1,888 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Vision Skeins
    1.08 18.8%
    $0.75 €0.35
  • Frantic Search
    0.78 29.8%
    $2.13 €1.12
  • Dream Fracture
    0.74 12.6%
    $0.17 €0.14
  • Arcane Denial
    0.66 28.0%
    $2.03 €2.14
  • Counterspell
    0.63 38.0%
    $4.28 €4.16
  • Words of Wisdom
    0.62 9.8%
    $0.78 €0.87
All instants (6)
  1. Vision Skeins relevance 1.08 · 18.8% (355 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Frantic Search relevance 0.78 · 29.8% (563 of 1,888 decks)
  3. Dream Fracture relevance 0.74 · 12.6% (237 of 1,888 decks)
  4. Arcane Denial relevance 0.66 · 28.0% (528 of 1,888 decks)
  5. Counterspell relevance 0.63 · 38.0% (718 of 1,888 decks)
  6. Words of Wisdom relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (185 of 1,888 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Windfall
    0.84 27.6%
    $6.02 €4.91
  • Prosperity
    0.69 12.4%
    $9.39 €1.42
  • Minds Aglow
    0.63 11.1%
    $1.42 €0.79
All sorceries (3)
  1. Windfall relevance 0.84 · 27.6% (522 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Prosperity relevance 0.69 · 12.4% (235 of 1,888 decks)
  3. Minds Aglow relevance 0.63 · 11.1% (210 of 1,888 decks)

Planeswalkers

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Jace Beleren
    0.68 12.3%
    $2.54 €0.94
All planeswalkers (1)
  1. Jace Beleren relevance 0.68 · 12.3% (233 of 1,888 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Geier Reach Sanitarium
    0.80 21.2%
    $2.31 €1.86
  • Cephalid Coliseum
    0.78 18.8%
    $0.31 €0.30
  • Lonely Sandbar
    0.64 14.3%
    $0.25 €0.15
All utility lands (3)
  1. Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.80 · 21.2% (401 of 1,888 decks)
  2. Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.78 · 18.8% (354 of 1,888 decks)
  3. Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.64 · 14.3% (270 of 1,888 decks)

EDH data for Cephalid Broker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,888 real decks.