Cards like Vizier of Tumbling Sands
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards like Relic of Progenitus
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Relic of Progenitus 47%
- Scrabbling Claws 33%
- Phyrexian Furnace 11%
- Soul-Guide Lantern 4%
- Conjurer's Bauble 2%
- Stone of Erech 1%
Other options: Lantern of the Lost, Jack-o'-Lantern, Silent Gravestone
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 50%
- Urza's Bauble 30%
Cards like Manifold Key
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Aphetto Alchemist
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Puppet Strings, Filigree Sages, Jandor's Saddlebags, Synod Artificer, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 54%
- Swiftfoot Boots 27%
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cyclonic Rift 27%
- Retraction Helix 12%
- Banishing Knack 9%
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 62%
- Negate 35%
- Wash Away 7%
- Essence Scatter 5%
- Spell Snare 4%
- Envelop 2%
Other options: Intervene, Stern Scolding, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Triskaidekaphile
5.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Sol Ring
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 78%
- Basalt Monolith 13%
- Mana Vault 10%
- Grim Monolith 7%
Cards like Pongify
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 44%
- Rapid Hybridization 38%
Cards like Commandeer
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 19%
- Misdirection 10%
- Snapback 7%
- Disrupting Shoal 3%
Cards like Liquimetal Torque
9.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Unwinding Clock
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Wizard Class
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Volatile Stormdrake
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Bender's Waterskin
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Honor-Worn Shaku
Cards like Swan Song
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 46%
- Strix Serenade 10%
Cards like Unctus, Grand Metatect
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cathartic Adept
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Merfolk Mesmerist, Vedalken Entrancer
Cards like Force of Negation
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 22%
- Force of Will 19%
All top picks (50)
- Glasses of Urza relevance 0.72 · 53.6% (164 of 306 decks)
- Scrabbling Claws relevance 0.70 · 32.7% (100 of 306 decks)
- Squee's Toy relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (47 of 306 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.59 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.48 · 53.6% (164 of 306 decks)
- Cathartic Adept relevance 0.65 · 19.9% (61 of 306 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.42 · 60.1% (184 of 306 decks)
- Timin, Youthful Geist relevance 0.70 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Navigator's Compass relevance 0.71 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Rhystic Deluge relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Grixis Illusionist relevance 0.69 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.45 · 39.2% (120 of 306 decks)
- Shuko relevance 0.64 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Phyrexian Furnace relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.52 · 19.6% (60 of 306 decks)
- Imagecrafter relevance 0.60 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.54 · 14.7% (45 of 306 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.45 · 31.4% (96 of 306 decks)
- Screeching Sliver relevance 0.63 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.42 · 36.3% (111 of 306 decks)
- Tidal Visionary relevance 0.54 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.47 · 23.5% (72 of 306 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (42 of 306 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.52 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Tidal Warrior relevance 0.52 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.44 · 23.9% (73 of 306 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.44 · 21.9% (67 of 306 decks)
- Duelist of the Mind relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Unnatural Selection relevance 0.56 · 7.2% (22 of 306 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.32 · 50.0% (153 of 306 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.38 · 30.7% (94 of 306 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.37 · 30.1% (92 of 306 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (28 of 306 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.35 · 35.9% (110 of 306 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.35 · 33.0% (101 of 306 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (22 of 306 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.33 · 35.6% (109 of 306 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.47 · 8.8% (27 of 306 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.43 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (43 of 306 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.37 · 19.9% (61 of 306 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (35 of 306 decks)
- Reef Shaman relevance 0.47 · 5.6% (17 of 306 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (47 of 306 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.40 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.48 · 53.6% (164 of 306 decks)
- Cathartic Adept relevance 0.65 · 19.9% (61 of 306 decks)
- Timin, Youthful Geist relevance 0.70 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Grixis Illusionist relevance 0.69 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.45 · 39.2% (120 of 306 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.52 · 19.6% (60 of 306 decks)
- Imagecrafter relevance 0.60 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.45 · 31.4% (96 of 306 decks)
- Screeching Sliver relevance 0.63 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.42 · 36.3% (111 of 306 decks)
- Tidal Visionary relevance 0.54 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.47 · 23.5% (72 of 306 decks)
- Tidal Warrior relevance 0.52 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.44 · 23.9% (73 of 306 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.44 · 21.9% (67 of 306 decks)
- Duelist of the Mind relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.38 · 30.7% (94 of 306 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (28 of 306 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.47 · 8.8% (27 of 306 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.43 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (43 of 306 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.37 · 19.9% (61 of 306 decks)
- Reef Shaman relevance 0.47 · 5.6% (17 of 306 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (47 of 306 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.40 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (56 of 306 decks)
- The Warring Triad relevance 0.46 · 5.9% (18 of 306 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Sly Instigator relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (15 of 306 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.45 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 0.40 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.32 · 17.6% (54 of 306 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.28 · 27.5% (84 of 306 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.33 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (36 of 306 decks)
- Wiccan, Rising Magician relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (13 of 306 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.33 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Courtly Provocateur relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.24 · 29.4% (90 of 306 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.33 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.27 · 18.0% (55 of 306 decks)
- Maeve, Insidious Singer relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.25 · 24.2% (74 of 306 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Glasses of Urza relevance 0.72 · 53.6% (164 of 306 decks)
- Scrabbling Claws relevance 0.70 · 32.7% (100 of 306 decks)
- Squee's Toy relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (47 of 306 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.59 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.42 · 60.1% (184 of 306 decks)
- Navigator's Compass relevance 0.71 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Shuko relevance 0.64 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Phyrexian Furnace relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.52 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.32 · 50.0% (153 of 306 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.37 · 30.1% (92 of 306 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.35 · 35.9% (110 of 306 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.35 · 33.0% (101 of 306 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.33 · 35.6% (109 of 306 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (31 of 306 decks)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.40 · 9.2% (28 of 306 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.35 · 14.4% (44 of 306 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.40 · 8.5% (26 of 306 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.43 · 5.6% (17 of 306 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (40 of 306 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (46 of 306 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.43 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.30 · 24.5% (75 of 306 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (45 of 306 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (19 of 306 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (18 of 306 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.28 · 23.9% (73 of 306 decks)
- Ghost Vacuum relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (18 of 306 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
- Grindclock relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 53.9% (165 of 306 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.26 · 22.9% (70 of 306 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (15 of 306 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.31 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.33 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.27 · 16.3% (50 of 306 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.26 · 19.0% (58 of 306 decks)
- Tooth of Chiss-Goria relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.24 · 26.5% (81 of 306 decks)
- Distorting Lens relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.25 · 20.6% (63 of 306 decks)
- Icy Manipulator relevance 0.41 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (19 of 306 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Wand of Denial relevance 0.43 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.22 · 16.0% (49 of 306 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Rhystic Deluge relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.54 · 14.7% (45 of 306 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (42 of 306 decks)
- Unnatural Selection relevance 0.56 · 7.2% (22 of 306 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (22 of 306 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (35 of 306 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (31 of 306 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.31 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.23 · 37.6% (115 of 306 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.32 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (69 of 306 decks)
- Drowned Secrets relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (13 of 306 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.26 · 16.3% (50 of 306 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (40 of 306 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.22 · 29.7% (91 of 306 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.28 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- Exchange of Words relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.26 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (17 of 306 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (16 of 306 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.16 · 44.1% (135 of 306 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (15 of 306 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.16 · 28.4% (87 of 306 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 25.2% (77 of 306 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Memory Erosion relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
All instants (50)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.35 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.29 · 23.2% (71 of 306 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (28 of 306 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.29 · 18.6% (57 of 306 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.33 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.26 · 14.4% (44 of 306 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (50 of 306 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (23 of 306 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.27 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.26 · 10.1% (31 of 306 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.26 · 10.1% (31 of 306 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 46.1% (141 of 306 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.23 · 14.1% (43 of 306 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (66 of 306 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.22 · 14.7% (45 of 306 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.18 · 32.4% (99 of 306 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (30 of 306 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.21 · 17.3% (53 of 306 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.19 · 25.2% (77 of 306 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.22 · 14.1% (43 of 306 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.20 · 19.0% (58 of 306 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.20 · 14.7% (45 of 306 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (26 of 306 decks)
- Envelop relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (17 of 306 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.18 · 21.6% (66 of 306 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (22 of 306 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (15 of 306 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (50 of 306 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.14 · 37.9% (116 of 306 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.15 · 34.3% (105 of 306 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.13 · 46.7% (143 of 306 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.13 · 44.4% (136 of 306 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.16 · 22.9% (70 of 306 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.27 · 27.5% (84 of 306 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (16 of 306 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (17 of 306 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (19 of 306 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.22 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.18 · 17.6% (54 of 306 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.17 · 14.4% (44 of 306 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (19 of 306 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (16 of 306 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (14 of 306 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (16 of 306 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.20 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.14 · 10.1% (31 of 306 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.28 · 15.7% (48 of 306 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.30 · 11.4% (35 of 306 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.22 · 20.6% (63 of 306 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (28 of 306 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (13 of 306 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Unstable Frontier relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (57 of 306 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.55 · 33.3% (102 of 306 decks)
- Desert relevance 0.64 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.54 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.41 · 34.6% (106 of 306 decks)
- Tower of the Magistrate relevance 0.53 · 5.9% (18 of 306 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (36 of 306 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (56 of 306 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.26 · 35.9% (110 of 306 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (27 of 306 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.32 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Rishadan Port relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (10 of 306 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.25 · 17.0% (52 of 306 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 28.1% (86 of 306 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 40.8% (125 of 306 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.27 · 9.2% (28 of 306 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (15 of 306 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.22 · 21.2% (65 of 306 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.19 · 26.5% (81 of 306 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (25 of 306 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (29 of 306 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 16.3% (50 of 306 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.18 · 30.4% (93 of 306 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.20 · 12.4% (38 of 306 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.19 · 13.4% (41 of 306 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (26 of 306 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (24 of 306 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.22 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (15 of 306 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 12.7% (39 of 306 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (16 of 306 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (19 of 306 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (21 of 306 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.17 · 6.5% (20 of 306 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 51.6% (158 of 306 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 39.9% (122 of 306 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 306 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (37 of 306 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (35 of 306 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (32 of 306 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.24 · 11.1% (34 of 306 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 17.6% (54 of 306 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (26 of 306 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (33 of 306 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (16 of 306 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (51 of 306 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (19 of 306 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (11 of 306 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (9 of 306 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (8 of 306 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 88.2% (270 of 306 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Loki, God of Mischief, from 306 real Commander decks.